| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 4 R 4119/20 | 21.10.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 R 1485/21 | 23.03.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 29. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 17 AS 798/21 | 11.04.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 3 AS 1284/21 WA | 07.06.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 29. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 5 VG 6304/15 | 31.01.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 VG 2424/21 ZVW | 09.12.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 29. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 1 SB 1918/17 | 26.08.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 SB 3067/20 | 17.11.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 29. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 7 R 1725/19 | 30.10.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 R 3671/20 | 01.12.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 29. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 2 SB 3003/15 | 27.07.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 12 SB 3075/18 | 22.10.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 29. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 13 U 1753/16 | 15.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 12 U 3845/19 | 30.09.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 29. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 13 SO 1265/21 | 11.08.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 SO 2796/21 | 13.04.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 29. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 5 SO 2380/19 | 31.08.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 SO 2937/20 | 13.04.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 29. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 9 SO 1407/18 | 13.05.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 SO 1679/19 | 13.04.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 29. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 4 SO 1399/21 | 08.09.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 SO 3201/21 | 13.04.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 29. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 1 KR 2321/18 | 30.09.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 3309/20 | 26.04.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 29. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 3 KR 402/16 | 07.06.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 16 KR 550/19 | 24.02.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 27. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 38 KA 170/20 | 16.03.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 27. Mai 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht München | S 38 KA 483/19 | 30.03.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 27. Mai 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 25 AS 3613/21 ER | 01.02.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 2 AS 330/22 B ER | 31.03.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 25. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 41 AS 142/19 | 25.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 7 AS 111/21 NZB | 03.03.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 25. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 9 AS 726/10 | 11.12.2016 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 6 AS 1568/19 | 28.10.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 25. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 38 AS 378/21 | 18.10.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 7 AS 1753/21 B | 15.03.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 25. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 41 SF 53/21 E | 23.03.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 6 AS 699/21 B | 30.03.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 25. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 33 AS 359/20 | 23.12.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 12 AS 199/21 | 08.09.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 AS 330/21 B | 11.04.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 25. Mai 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 13 AS 1648/19 | 17.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 12 AS 2009/19 | 08.09.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 14 AS 394/21 B | 25.04.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 25. Mai 2022 |
| Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 535/17 KL | 18.03.2021 | - | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 25. Mai 2022 | ||||
| - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 2 R 746/20 - Zurückweisung Befangenheit | 15.03.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 25. Mai 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 53 KR 285/16 | 11.02.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 26 BA 32/20 | 05.11.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 25. Mai 2022 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 223 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 223 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 223 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 5550, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156918 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 R 1485/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-r-1485-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:40:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:40:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-r-1485-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156914 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 1284/21 WA [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-1284-21-wa [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:40:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:40:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-1284-21-wa/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156910 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 VG 2424/21 ZVW [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-vg-2424-21-zvw [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:39:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:39:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-vg-2424-21-zvw/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156906 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 SB 3067/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-sb-3067-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:39:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:39:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-sb-3067-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156903 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 R 3671/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-r-3671-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:39:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:39:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-r-3671-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156899 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 SB 3075/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-sb-3075-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:39:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:39:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-sb-3075-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156894 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 U 3845/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-u-3845-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:39:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:39:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-u-3845-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156890 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 SO 2796/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-so-2796-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:39:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:39:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-so-2796-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156887 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 SO 2937/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-so-2937-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:39:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:39:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-so-2937-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156883 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 SO 1679/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-so-1679-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:39:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:39:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-so-1679-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156879 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 SO 3201/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-so-3201-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:39:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:39:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-so-3201-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156875 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 3309/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-3309-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:39:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:39:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-3309-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147081 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 KR 550/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-kr-550-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:20:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:20:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-kr-550-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143453 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 38 KA 170/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-38-ka-170-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:39:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:39:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-38-ka-170-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143450 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 38 KA 483/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-38-ka-483-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:39:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:39:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-38-ka-483-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147076 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 330/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-330-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:20:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:20:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-330-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147071 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 111/21 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-111-21-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:20:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:20:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-111-21-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147067 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 1568/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-1568-19-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:19:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:19:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-1568-19-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147062 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 1753/21 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-1753-21-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:19:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:19:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-1753-21-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147057 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 699/21 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-699-21-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:19:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:19:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-699-21-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147051 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 AS 199/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-as-199-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:19:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:19:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-as-199-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147046 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 AS 2009/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-as-2009-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:19:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:19:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-as-2009-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147041 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 535/17 KL [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-535-17-kl [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:19:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:19:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-535-17-kl/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128043 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 R 746/20 - Zurückweisung Befangenheit [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-r-746-20-zurueckweisung-befangenheit [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:35:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:35:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-r-746-20-zurueckweisung-befangenheit/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128040 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 26 BA 32/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-26-ba-32-20-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:35:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:35:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-26-ba-32-20-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156918 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 R 1485/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-r-1485-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:40:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:40:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-r-1485-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 3b350a9ace9ba22380913ee997cd022f [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:c9f07a4c4cc4dbb90047a3a0996399ec:0.11232600 1749520078 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.