| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 192 SB 1979/14 | 09.05.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 11 SB 125/18 | 10.05.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 25. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 211 KR 1586/15 | 24.11.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 4 BA 2/18 | 16.02.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 25. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 2 AL 122/14 | 01.06.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 14 AL 104/17 | 12.08.2020 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 25. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 50 AS 1351/17 WA | 29.10.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 AS 1622/20 | 27.04.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 25. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 103 AS 2279/18 | 08.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 34 AS 2279/18 | 06.05.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 25. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 51 KR 2636/13 | 31.01.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 28 KR 104/19 | 07.04.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 25. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 29 AS 1765/17 WA | 05.09.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 14 AS 1948/18 NZB | 21.10.2020 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 25. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 99 AS 22900/15 | 15.08.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 34 AS 1703/18 | 18.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 14 AS 61/20 R | 14.12.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 25. Mai 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 2 AS 498/15 | 08.08.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AS 565/17 | 10.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 AS 81/20 R | 26.01.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 25. Mai 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 13 R 419/19 | 09.07.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 14 R 370/20 | 21.10.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 336/21 B | 31.03.2022 | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 24. Mai 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 8 U 4/16 | 02.06.2017 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 U 126/17 | 02.02.2022 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 23. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 12 KA 83/13 | 05.11.2014 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KA 56/21 | 16.02.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 23. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 39 KR 342/22 KH ER | 03.05.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 23. Mai 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Fulda | S 4 KR 120/22 ER | 19.05.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Fulda | 23. Mai 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 23 AS 779/21 ER | 21.12.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 8 AS 18/22 B ER | 06.04.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 23. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 94 AS 4630/15 | 14.06.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 4 AS 450/18 | 16.02.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 23. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 206 AS 12325/15 | 01.10.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 10 AS 2286/18 | 07.04.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 23. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 116 AS 3079/21 ER | 25.05.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 10 AS 686/21 B ER | 09.07.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 23. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 28 R 766/14 | 16.12.2015 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 R 231/18 WA | 15.12.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 23. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 18 KR 11/22 ER | 02.02.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 4 KR 40/22 B ER | 07.04.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 23. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 34 AS 5924/21 ER | 21.10.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 10 AS 1386/21 B ER | 16.12.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 23. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 9 SO 16/21 ER | 16.07.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 15 SO 211/21 B ER | 16.12.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 23. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 65 AS 18720/14 | 25.01.2016 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 32 AS 579/16 | 01.12.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 23. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 6 R 3311/20 | 11.06.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 R 2382/21 | 09.03.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 20. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 2 SB 1851/21 | 06.09.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 SB 2987/21 B | 22.02.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 20. Mai 2022 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 224 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 224 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 224 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 5575, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128034 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 SB 125/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-sb-125-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:35:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:35:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-sb-125-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128031 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 BA 2/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ba-2-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:35:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:35:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ba-2-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128028 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 AL 104/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-al-104-17-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:35:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:35:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-al-104-17-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128025 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 1622/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-1622-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:35:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:35:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-1622-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128022 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 34 AS 2279/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-34-as-2279-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:35:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:35:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-34-as-2279-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128019 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 28 KR 104/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-28-kr-104-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:35:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:35:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-28-kr-104-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128015 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 AS 1948/18 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-as-1948-18-nzb-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:35:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:35:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-as-1948-18-nzb-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87780 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 14 AS 61/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-14-as-61-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:10:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:10:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-14-as-61-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87779 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 AS 81/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-as-81-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:10:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:10:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-as-81-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140297 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 R 419/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-r-419-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:17:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:17:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-r-419-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160719 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 U 126/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-u-126-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:26:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:26:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-u-126-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149673 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KA 56/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ka-56-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:43:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:43:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ka-56-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143400 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 39 KR 342/22 KH ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-39-kr-342-22-kh-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:39:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:39:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-39-kr-342-22-kh-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134573 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 4 KR 120/22 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-4-kr-120-22-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:23:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:23:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-4-kr-120-22-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128011 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 AS 18/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-as-18-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:35:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:35:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-as-18-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128008 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 450/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-450-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:35:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:35:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-450-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128005 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 AS 2286/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-as-2286-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:35:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:35:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-as-2286-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128002 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 AS 686/21 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-as-686-21-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:35:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:35:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-as-686-21-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127999 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 231/18 WA [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-231-18-wa-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:35:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:35:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-231-18-wa-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127996 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 40/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-40-22-b-er-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:35:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:35:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-40-22-b-er-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127993 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 AS 1386/21 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-as-1386-21-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:35:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:35:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-as-1386-21-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127990 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 SO 211/21 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-so-211-21-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:35:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:35:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-so-211-21-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127987 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 32 AS 579/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-32-as-579-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:35:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:35:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-32-as-579-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156871 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 R 2382/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-r-2382-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:39:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:39:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-r-2382-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156867 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 SB 2987/21 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-sb-2987-21-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:39:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:39:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-sb-2987-21-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128034 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 SB 125/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-sb-125-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:35:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:35:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-sb-125-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => b079fc797389ba851ac08ef3b2b365e6 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:7f1e9484e4e57c10a7ec42099e9af13e:0.14506700 1749539249 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.