| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 74 SV 53/20 | 28.09.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 SV 8/20 B | 03.03.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 20. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 18 AS 1617/16 | 24.01.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 AS 474/19 NZB | 15.02.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 20. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 202 AS 1306/22 ER | 18.03.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AS 312/22 B ER | 07.04.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 20. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 120 AL 323/17 | 21.01.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AL 22/20 | 06.04.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 20. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 59 AS 10533/19 | 07.10.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 19 AS 1506/20 | 07.01.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 20. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 28 R 99/18 WA | 04.04.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 17 R 360/19 | 24.03.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 20. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 97 R 2219/18 | 17.06.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 17 R 534/19 | 24.02.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 20. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 20 R 2047/19 | 02.08.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 16 R 487/21 | 06.04.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 20. Mai 2022 | ||
| - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 AR 22/20 KO | 06.05.2022 | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 19. Mai 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht München | S 28 SF 63/21 E | 16.12.2021 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 12 SF 297/21 | 21.03.2022 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 19. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 1 SF 2/22 E | 25.02.2022 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 12 SF 63/22 | 02.05.2022 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 19. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Würzburg | S 18 AY 150/21 ER | 18.11.2021 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 AY 7/22 B ER | 15.03.2022 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 19. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 204 AS 6834/21 ER | 01.12.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 AS 1435/21 B ER | 27.12.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 19. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 15 U 85/17 | 21.04.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 U 84/21 | 16.11.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 19. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 12 U 12/15 | 29.07.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 U 179/21 B | 24.02.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 19. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 68 U 26/18 | 16.02.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 U 36/21 | 05.04.2011 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 19. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 24 AS 1574/15 | 16.03.2017 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 2 AS 346/17 | 07.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 AS 3/21 R | 26.01.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 19. Mai 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 6 AS 4759/19 | 05.05.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 19 AS 728/20 | 23.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 14 AS 77/20 R | 14.12.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 19. Mai 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 50 AS 1284/18 | 18.12.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 7 AS 171/19 | 05.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 14 AS 27/20 R | 14.12.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 19. Mai 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 12 AS 4276/16 | 06.06.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 19 AS 1204/18 | 07.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 14 AS 21/20 R | 14.12.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 19. Mai 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 20 R 282/14 | 11.01.2018 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 3 R 14/18 | 24.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 R 17/19 R | 19.10.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 19. Mai 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 166 KR 569/17 | 15.12.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 16/18 | 14.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 40/19 R | 01.02.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 19. Mai 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 10 KR 2478/18 | 27.02.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 857/19 | 15.10.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 39/19 R | 01.02.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 19. Mai 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 16 U 31/16 | 12.04.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 4 U 619/18 | 31.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 12/20 R | 08.12.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 19. Mai 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 11 KR 571/18 | 13.11.2018 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 17/19 | 02.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 6/21 R | 10.03.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 19. Mai 2022 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 226 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 226 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 226 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 5625, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127924 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 SV 8/20 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-sv-8-20-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:34:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:34:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-sv-8-20-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127922 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 AS 474/19 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-as-474-19-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:34:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:34:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-as-474-19-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127919 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 AS 312/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-as-312-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:34:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:34:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-as-312-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127917 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 AL 22/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-al-22-20-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:34:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:34:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-al-22-20-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127914 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 AS 1506/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-as-1506-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:34:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:34:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-as-1506-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127911 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 17 R 360/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-17-r-360-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:34:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:34:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-17-r-360-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127908 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 17 R 534/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-17-r-534-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:34:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:34:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-17-r-534-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127905 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 R 487/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-r-487-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:34:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:34:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-r-487-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150360 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 AR 22/20 KO [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-ar-22-20-ko [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:50:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:50:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-ar-22-20-ko/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130681 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 SF 297/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-sf-297-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:07:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:07:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-sf-297-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130680 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 SF 63/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-sf-63-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:07:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:07:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-sf-63-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130679 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 AY 7/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ay-7-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:07:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:07:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ay-7-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127902 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 1435/21 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-1435-21-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:34:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:34:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-1435-21-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127899 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 84/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-84-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:34:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:34:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-84-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127897 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 179/21 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-179-21-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:34:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:34:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-179-21-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127894 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 36/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-36-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:34:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:34:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-36-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87778 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 AS 3/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-as-3-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:10:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:10:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-as-3-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87777 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 14 AS 77/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-14-as-77-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:10:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:10:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-14-as-77-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87776 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 14 AS 27/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-14-as-27-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:10:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:10:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-14-as-27-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87775 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 14 AS 21/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-14-as-21-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:10:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:10:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-14-as-21-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87774 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 R 17/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-r-17-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:10:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:10:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-r-17-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87773 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 KR 40/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-kr-40-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:10:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:10:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-kr-40-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87772 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 KR 39/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-kr-39-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:10:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:10:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-kr-39-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87771 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 12/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-12-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:10:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:10:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-12-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87770 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 6/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-6-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:10:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:10:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-6-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127924 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 SV 8/20 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-sv-8-20-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:34:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:34:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-sv-8-20-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => defb8d2ff67c4875622f7cb55d0a4f61 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:6e55584969a9a75a39c31a414bda902d:0.93320300 1749610258 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.