| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 4 R 806/21 ER | 23.09.2021 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 R 487/21 B ER | 02.05.2022 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 18. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 17 R 251/20 KN | 28.12.2020 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 R 37/21 KN | 12.04.2022 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 18. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 35 R 1075/19 | 22.06.2020 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 R 453/20 | 12.04.2022 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 18. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 36 KR 385/21 ER | 03.05.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 215/21 B ER | 05.07.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. Mai 2022 | ||
| - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 425/14 KL | 03.12.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 15/22 B | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 27 AS 2415/17 WA | 27.10.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AS 1613/20 | 15.12.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 29 AS 1765/17 WA | 05.09.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 14 AS 1948/18 NZB | 21.10.2020 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 76 KR 1283/13 | 16.05.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 267/17 | 25.01.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 224 KR 3816/15 | 21.02.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 BA 35/19 | 16.03.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 210 KR 2095/13 | 04.04.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 246/17 | 16.03.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 53 AS 7630/21 ER | 24.01.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 AS 108/22 B ER | 17.02.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 121 AS 8321/20 | 07.09.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 AS 1075/21 B PKH | 21.02.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 121 AS 8321/20 | 07.09.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 AS 1075/21 B PKH | 21.02.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 83 KA 503/15 | 09.05.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 7 KA 24/18 | 09.02.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 1 KA 51/20 WA | 16.12.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 7 KA 2/22 B | 08.02.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 4 AS 2297/16 | 13.12.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 AS 258/19 | 07.02.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 1 KA 71/20 WA | 23.06.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 7 KA 26/21 B | 14.01.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. Mai 2022 | ||
| - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 7 KA 47/18 KL | 22.09.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. Mai 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 24 AS 1385/17 | 27.11.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 AS 1/20 | 20.01.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 2 U 10/20 | 16.09.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 U 148/20 | 10.02.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 50 AS 4565/14 | 29.10.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 AS 1623/20 | 27.04.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 31 AS 1129/18 | 28.11.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 AS 39/20 | 05.04.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 15 U 52/13 | 16.04.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 U 98/19 | 20.01.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 182 KR 2081/17 | 30.04.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 4 KR 230/19 | 17.03.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 1 KR 168/21 KH | 16.03.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 17. Mai 2022 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 227 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 227 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 227 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 5650, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160712 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 R 487/21 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-r-487-21-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:26:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:26:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-r-487-21-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160709 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 R 37/21 KN [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-r-37-21-kn [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:26:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:26:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-r-37-21-kn/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160705 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 R 453/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-r-453-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:26:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:26:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-r-453-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127889 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 215/21 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-215-21-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:34:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:34:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-215-21-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127887 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 425/14 KL [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-425-14-kl [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:34:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:34:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-425-14-kl/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127884 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 AS 1613/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-as-1613-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:34:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:34:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-as-1613-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127878 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 AS 1948/18 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-as-1948-18-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:34:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:34:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-as-1948-18-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127875 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 267/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-267-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:34:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:34:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-267-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127872 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 BA 35/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-ba-35-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:34:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:34:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-ba-35-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127868 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 246/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-246-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:34:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:34:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-246-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127866 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 AS 108/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-as-108-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:34:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:34:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-as-108-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127864 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AS 1075/21 B PKH [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-as-1075-21-b-pkh [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:34:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:34:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-as-1075-21-b-pkh/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127863 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AS 1075/21 B PKH [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-as-1075-21-b-pkh [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:34:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:34:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-as-1075-21-b-pkh/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127861 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 KA 24/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ka-24-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:34:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:34:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ka-24-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127856 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 KA 2/22 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ka-2-22-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:34:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:34:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ka-2-22-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127853 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AS 258/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-as-258-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:34:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:34:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-as-258-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127851 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 KA 26/21 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ka-26-21-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:34:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:34:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ka-26-21-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127848 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 KA 47/18 KL [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ka-47-18-kl [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:34:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:34:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ka-47-18-kl/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127844 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 1/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-1-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:34:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:34:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-1-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127842 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 148/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-148-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:34:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:34:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-148-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127838 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 1623/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-1623-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:34:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:34:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-1623-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127835 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 39/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-39-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:34:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:34:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-39-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127832 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 98/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-98-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:34:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:34:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-98-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127829 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 230/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-230-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:33:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:33:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-230-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144939 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 1 KR 168/21 KH [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-1-kr-168-21-kh [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 03:00:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 02:00:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-1-kr-168-21-kh/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160712 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 R 487/21 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-r-487-21-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:26:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:26:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-r-487-21-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 9d6806dfc809c6c52155d8d25f2b0aea [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:edd979e9c2c7fd4da5e70727e5ac837b:0.55911900 1749610617 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.