| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 29 AS 279/20 | 20.04.2022 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 AS 305/22 | 31.10.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Gießen | 17. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 1 KR 2269/21 | 13.04.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Reutlingen | 17. Mai 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 1 KR 2269/21 | 13.04.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Reutlingen | 17. Mai 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht München | S 43 KA 1297/15 | 08.05.2018 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 12 KA 24/18 | 03.03.2021 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 17. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 21 R 3360/16 | 26.02.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 16 R 315/20 | 23.03.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 157 AS 1601/17 | 20.02.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AS 347/20 | 23.03.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 149 AS 464/22 ER | 14.02.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AS 232/22 B ER | 17.03.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 19 R 13/21 | 27.08.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 16 R 543/21 | 14.02.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 37 EG 2/16 | 20.09.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 17 EG 8/18 | 23.09.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 94 AS 7290/21 ER | 29.12.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AS 12/22 B ER | 07.02.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 37 AS 10581/17 | 10.08.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AS 1713/18 | 19.01.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 3 EG 15/20 | 30.03.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 17 EG 2/21 | 16.12.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 137 AS 3894/18 | 20.06.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AS 1513/19 | 19.01.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 28 R 766/14 | 16.12.2015 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 R 231/18 WA | 15.12.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 9 KR 239/16 | 08.01.2014 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 4 KR 30/18 | 16.02.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 184 SO 53/16 | 11.06.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 15 SO 142/18 | 11.03.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 23 R 5182/14 | 22.03.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 R 379/17 | 01.12.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 23 R 5182/14 | 22.03.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 R 379/17 | 30.12.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. Mai 2022 | ||
| - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 15 SO 154/17 KL | 11.03.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. Mai 2022 | ||||
| - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 15 SO 154/17 KL | 11.03.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. Mai 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 78 AS 2795/14 | 31.07.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AS 1572/18 | 21.01.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 26 AS 2983/13 | 28.09.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 19 AS 2551/17 | 18.06.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 186 AS 16646/14 | 25.04.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 19 AS 1129/17 | 21.01.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 20 R 3606/13 | 27.03.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 17 R 354/17 | 16.12.2020 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 29 RA 329/15 WA | 23.11.2016 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 17 R 5/17 | 16.12.2020 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. Mai 2022 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 228 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 228 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 228 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 5675, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134938 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 29 AS 279/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-29-as-279-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:26:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:26:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-29-as-279-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133015 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => Zum Anspruch auf Zahlung einer Aufwandspauschale nach Einfügung von Satz 4 in § 275 Abs. 1c SGB V zum 01.01.2016 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => zum-anspruch-auf-zahlung-einer-aufwandspauschale-nach-einfuegung-von-satz-4-in-%c2%a7-275-abs-1c-sgb-v-zum-01-01-2016-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:10:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:10:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/zum-anspruch-auf-zahlung-einer-aufwandspauschale-nach-einfuegung-von-satz-4-in-%c2%a7-275-abs-1c-sgb-v-zum-01-01-2016-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133012 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => Zum Anspruch auf Zahlung einer Aufwandspauschale nach Einfügung von Satz 4 in § 275 Abs. 1c SGB V zum 01.01.2016 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => zum-anspruch-auf-zahlung-einer-aufwandspauschale-nach-einfuegung-von-satz-4-in-%c2%a7-275-abs-1c-sgb-v-zum-01-01-2016 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:10:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:10:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/zum-anspruch-auf-zahlung-einer-aufwandspauschale-nach-einfuegung-von-satz-4-in-%c2%a7-275-abs-1c-sgb-v-zum-01-01-2016/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130678 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 KA 24/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-ka-24-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:07:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:07:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-ka-24-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127826 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 R 315/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-r-315-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:33:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:33:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-r-315-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127822 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 AS 347/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-as-347-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:33:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:33:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-as-347-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127819 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 AS 232/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-as-232-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:33:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:33:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-as-232-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127816 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 R 543/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-r-543-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:33:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:33:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-r-543-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127809 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 17 EG 8/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-17-eg-8-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:33:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:33:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-17-eg-8-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127807 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 AS 12/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-as-12-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:33:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:33:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-as-12-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127804 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 AS 1713/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-as-1713-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:33:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:33:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-as-1713-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127800 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 17 EG 2/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-17-eg-2-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:33:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:33:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-17-eg-2-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127797 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 AS 1513/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-as-1513-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:33:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:33:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-as-1513-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127794 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 231/18 WA [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-231-18-wa [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:33:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:33:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-231-18-wa/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127791 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 30/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-30-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:33:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:33:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-30-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127788 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 SO 142/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-so-142-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:33:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:33:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-so-142-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127785 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 379/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-379-17-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:33:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:33:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-379-17-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127782 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 379/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-379-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:33:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:33:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-379-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127780 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 SO 154/17 KL [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-so-154-17-kl-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:33:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:33:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-so-154-17-kl-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127779 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 SO 154/17 KL [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-so-154-17-kl [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:33:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:33:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-so-154-17-kl/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127777 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 AS 1572/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-as-1572-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:33:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:33:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-as-1572-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127774 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 AS 2551/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-as-2551-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:33:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:33:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-as-2551-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127771 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 AS 1129/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-as-1129-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:33:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:33:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-as-1129-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127768 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 17 R 354/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-17-r-354-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:33:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:33:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-17-r-354-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127765 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 17 R 5/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-17-r-5-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:33:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:33:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-17-r-5-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134938 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 29 AS 279/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-29-as-279-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:26:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:26:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-29-as-279-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 441ef6ef0b708e70948db4a6613fd398 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:0bf0f05ddfcbe211e61f682c1b494823:0.39048200 1749731779 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.