| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 2 EG 33/14 | 21.12.2016 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 17 EG 4/17 | 23.09.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 142 AS 6423/17 | 29.08.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 19 AS 1806/18 | 18.11.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 222 AS 103/18 | 16.10.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 19 AS 2077/18 | 18.05.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 157 AS 5603/21 ER | 29.09.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 AS 1182/21 B ER | 09.12.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 157 AS 5603/21 ER | 29.09.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 AS 1182/21 B ER | 09.12.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 79 KA 387/14 | 26.07.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 7 KA 48/17 | 17.11.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 4/22 B | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. Mai 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 6 R 343/15 | 10.11.2016 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 1/17 | 03.12.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 1/22 R | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. Mai 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 4 R 464/16 | 12.09.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 22 LW 7/19 | 23.02.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 140 AS 9989/17 | 30.04.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 10 AS 802/19 | 20.04.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 37 KR 401/17 | 30.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 430/19 | 28.12.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 12 U 111/17 | 15.02.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 U 66/19 | 21.01.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 206 AS 8761/20 | 04.08.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 AS 997/21 B PKH | 16.12.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 18 U 100/18 | 05.06.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 U 126/19 | 12.03.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 81 KR 1383/17 | 28.06.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 234/18 | 10.12.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 136 AS 17077/12 | 25.01.2016 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 32 AS 588/16 | 22.04.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 36 KR 485/19 | 01.11.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 440/19 | 29.11.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 15 U 35/13 | 23.02.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 U 146/18 | 21.01.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 10 U 148/15 | 26.08.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 U 182/18 | 25.02.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 127 AS 16902/16 | 05.03.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 AS 705/19 | 15.11.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 12 U 15/17 | 02.02.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 U 46/18 | 21.01.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 12 U 15/17 | 02.02.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 U 46/18 | 21.01.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 83 KA 113/13 | 10.02.2016 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 7 KA 27/16 | 17.11.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 1/22 B | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. Mai 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 83 KA 113/13 | 10.02.2016 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 7 KA 27/16 | 17.11.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 1/22 B | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. Mai 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 16 AS 1239/21 ER | 18.03.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 AS 350/21 B ER | 20.04.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 83 KA 109/13 | 10.02.2016 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 7 KA 28/16 | 17.11.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 5/22 B | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. Mai 2022 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 229 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 229 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 229 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 5700, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127762 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 17 EG 4/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-17-eg-4-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:33:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:33:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-17-eg-4-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127759 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 AS 1806/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-as-1806-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:33:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:33:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-as-1806-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127752 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 AS 2077/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-as-2077-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:33:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:33:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-as-2077-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127747 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 AS 1182/21 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-as-1182-21-b-er-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:33:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:33:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-as-1182-21-b-er-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127746 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 AS 1182/21 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-as-1182-21-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:33:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:33:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-as-1182-21-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127744 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 KA 48/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ka-48-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:33:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:33:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ka-48-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127739 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 1/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-1-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:33:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:33:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-1-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127736 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 22 LW 7/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-22-lw-7-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:33:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:33:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-22-lw-7-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127733 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 AS 802/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-as-802-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:33:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:33:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-as-802-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127730 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 430/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-430-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:33:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:33:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-430-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127728 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 66/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-66-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:33:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:33:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-66-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127724 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AS 997/21 B PKH [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-as-997-21-b-pkh [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:33:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:33:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-as-997-21-b-pkh/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127720 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 126/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-126-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:32:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:32:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-126-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127716 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 234/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-234-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:32:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:32:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-234-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127713 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 32 AS 588/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-32-as-588-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:32:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:32:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-32-as-588-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127711 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 440/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-440-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:32:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:32:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-440-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127708 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 146/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-146-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:32:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:32:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-146-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127703 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 182/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-182-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:32:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:32:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-182-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127700 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 AS 705/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-as-705-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:32:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:32:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-as-705-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127697 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 46/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-46-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:32:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:32:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-46-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127696 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 46/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-46-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:32:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:32:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-46-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127693 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 KA 27/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ka-27-16-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:32:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:32:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ka-27-16-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127692 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 KA 27/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ka-27-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:32:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:32:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ka-27-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127690 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 350/21 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-350-21-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:32:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:32:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-350-21-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127687 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 KA 28/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ka-28-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:32:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:32:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ka-28-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127762 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 17 EG 4/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-17-eg-4-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:33:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:33:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-17-eg-4-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => bcfabedf5fe99496f24860b11dcd06af [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:21bbdacc592dbe231aeccec30dcc059c:0.72393800 1750752777 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.