| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 11 SO 793/24 ER | 09.04.2024 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 SO 1332/24 ER-B | 03.06.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 13. September 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 2 SO 1655/23 | 26.03.2024 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 SO 1323/24 | 07.08.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 13. September 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 11 R 646/19 | 22.03.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 R 1238/23 | 07.12.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 13. September 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 9 SO 832/24 ER | 05.04.2024 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 SO 1160/24 ER-B | 15.05.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 13. September 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 16 AS 3070/23 ER | 13.03.2024 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 AS 1158/24 ER-B | 16.05.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 13. September 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 11 AS 4062/19 | 04.03.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 AS 1054/22 | 20.03.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 13. September 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 126 AS 141/22 | 06.05.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 13. September 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 15 U 252/14 | 02.11.2016 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 U 438/16 | 14.08.2024 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 13. September 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 14 AL 490/21 | 06.07.2022 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 2 AL 31/22 | 23.11.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 1/23 R | 05.06.2024 | Bundessozialgericht | 13. September 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Kiel | S 10 KR 2/24 ER | 14.04.2024 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 10 KR 71/24 B ER | 28.08.2024 | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 12. September 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 16 AS 1477/23 | 10.11.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 12. September 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 30 KR 186/21 | 26.10.2021 | - | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 12. September 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 35 AS 1481/23 | 10.04.2024 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 7 AS 716/24 B | 30.07.2024 | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 12. September 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 25 AS 2400/23 ER | 06.05.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 12. September 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 31 P 47/22 | 07.11.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 12. September 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 15 AL 1084/23 | 18.12.2023 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AL 134/23 | 12.07.2024 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 14/24 BH | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 12. September 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | S 18 KR 143/21 | 18.07.2024 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 232/24 | - | - | Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | 12. September 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | S 29 SO 70/21 | 15.03.2024 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 SO 53/24 | - | - | Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | 12. September 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 2 R 1516/24 | 10.09.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht Heilbronn | 12. September 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 7 R 972/20 | 22.02.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 R 207/21 | 25.08.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 10/22 R | 18.04.2024 | Bundessozialgericht | 12. September 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 2 SO 2354/20 | 29.02.2024 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 SO 1044/24 | 07.08.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 11. September 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 8 SO 1829/22 | 21.02.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 SO 983/23 | 22.03.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 11. September 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 6 SO 337/21 | 15.02.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 SO 944/22 | 15.03.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 11. September 2024 | ||
| Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 SO 699/22 KL | 18.10.2023 | - | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 11. September 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 11 SO 4112/23 | 08.02.2024 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 SO 649/24 | 15.05.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 11. September 2024 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 23 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 23 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 23 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 550, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160928 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 SO 1332/24 ER-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-so-1332-24-er-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:29:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:29:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-so-1332-24-er-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160926 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 SO 1323/24 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-so-1323-24 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:29:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:29:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-so-1323-24/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160924 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 R 1238/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-r-1238-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:29:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:29:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-r-1238-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160922 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 SO 1160/24 ER-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-so-1160-24-er-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:29:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:29:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-so-1160-24-er-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160920 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 1158/24 ER-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-1158-24-er-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:29:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:29:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-1158-24-er-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160917 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 1054/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-1054-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:29:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:29:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-1054-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150381 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 126 AS 141/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-126-as-141-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:50:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:50:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-126-as-141-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130909 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 438/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-438-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:14:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:14:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-438-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88145 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 11 AL 1/23 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-11-al-1-23-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:21:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:21:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-11-al-1-23-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150576 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 KR 71/24 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-kr-71-24-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:52:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:52:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-kr-71-24-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144993 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 16 AS 1477/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-16-as-1477-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 03:01:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 02:01:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-16-as-1477-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144992 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 30 KR 186/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-30-kr-186-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 03:01:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 02:01:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-30-kr-186-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144991 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 35 AS 1481/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-35-as-1481-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 03:01:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 02:01:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-35-as-1481-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144990 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 25 AS 2400/23 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-25-as-2400-23-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 03:01:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 02:01:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-25-as-2400-23-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144989 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 31 P 47/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-31-p-47-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 03:01:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 02:01:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-31-p-47-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137398 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AL 134/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-al-134-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:44:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:44:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-al-134-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134746 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 KR 143/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-kr-143-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:24:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:24:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-kr-143-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134739 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 29 SO 70/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-29-so-70-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:24:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:24:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-29-so-70-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131153 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 2 R 1516/24 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-2-r-1516-24 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:54:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:54:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-2-r-1516-24/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88144 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 5 R 10/22 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-5-r-10-22-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:21:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:21:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-5-r-10-22-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160914 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 SO 1044/24 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-so-1044-24 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:29:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:29:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-so-1044-24/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160912 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 SO 983/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-so-983-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:29:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:29:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-so-983-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160910 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 SO 944/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-so-944-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:29:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:29:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-so-944-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160906 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 SO 699/22 KL [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-so-699-22-kl [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:29:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:29:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-so-699-22-kl/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160903 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 SO 649/24 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-so-649-24 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:29:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:29:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-so-649-24/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160928 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 SO 1332/24 ER-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-so-1332-24-er-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:29:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:29:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-so-1332-24-er-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => f406926d7e9d2c994089d0438151042b [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:936b311585749c8dc80b8e7c9a99fd8f:0.42724100 1745110014 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.