| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 83 KA 4509/15 | 13.06.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 7 KA 29/18 | 22.09.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 18 AS 1575/16 | 21.02.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 AS 702/19 | 30.09.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 31 AS 1599/17 | 26.10.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AS 2267/18 | 25.08.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 27 AS 30022/14 | 28.04.2016 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AS 998/18 WA | 23.06.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 123 AS 17723/16 | 14.06.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AS 1472/18 | 17.03.2021 | B 4 AS 160/21 B | 15.07.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. Mai 2022 | |
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 18 AL 25/15 | 09.10.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AL 168/18 | 23.06.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 62 AL 1279/16 | 11.04.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AL 69/18 | 05.05.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 31 R 6857/13 | 07.09.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 16 R 755/18 | 09.08.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 1 R 96/17 | 17.10.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 16 R 796/18 | 24.02.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 52 AL 733/16 | 17.10.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AL 206/17 | 19.01.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 2 AL 1377/21 | 10.05.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | 16. Mai 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 69 R 4977/09 | 02.10.2012 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 16 R 76/19 | 24.02.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 58 AL 1023/18 | 25.01.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AL 29/19 | 05.05.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 5 R 872/16 | 05.12.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 16 R 876/19 | 15.12.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 36 EG 8/14 | 06.03.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 17 EG 4/19 | 16.12.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 149 AS 11157/18 | 13.02.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AS 412/20 | 20.01.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 35 AL 155/18 | 06.03.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AL 41/20 | 15.04.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 62 AL 1398/17 | 23.04.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AL 48/20 | 20.01.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 120 AL 323/17 | 21.01.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AL 22/20 | 06.04.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 7 R 51/15 | 04.12.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 2 R 40/18 | 19.08.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 37 KR 346/17 | 27.05.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 275/21 B | 23.06.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 105 R 2438/17 | 12.04.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 2 R 368/19 | 10.05.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 121 AS 6990/15 WA | 23.11.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 AS 194/18 | 11.08.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 11 R 656/17 | 16.05.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 2 R 428/18 | 20.01.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 14 R 581/19 | 21.07.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 16 R 686/20 | 13.04.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Mai 2022 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 230 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 230 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 230 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 5725, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127685 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 KA 29/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ka-29-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:32:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:32:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ka-29-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127682 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 AS 702/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-as-702-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:32:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:32:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-as-702-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127671 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 AS 2267/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-as-2267-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:32:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:32:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-as-2267-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127668 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 AS 998/18 WA [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-as-998-18-wa [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:32:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:32:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-as-998-18-wa/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127665 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 AS 1472/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-as-1472-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:32:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:32:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-as-1472-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127662 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 AL 168/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-al-168-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:32:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:32:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-al-168-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127660 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 AL 69/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-al-69-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:32:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:32:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-al-69-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127657 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 R 755/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-r-755-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:32:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:32:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-r-755-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127654 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 R 796/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-r-796-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:32:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:32:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-r-796-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127651 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 AL 206/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-al-206-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:32:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:32:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-al-206-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140074 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 2 AL 1377/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-2-al-1377-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:14:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:14:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-2-al-1377-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127648 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 R 76/19 WA [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-r-76-19-wa [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:32:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:32:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-r-76-19-wa/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127645 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 AL 29/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-al-29-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:32:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:32:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-al-29-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127642 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 R 876/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-r-876-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:32:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:32:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-r-876-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127637 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 17 EG 4/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-17-eg-4-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:32:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:32:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-17-eg-4-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127632 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 AS 412/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-as-412-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:32:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:32:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-as-412-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127629 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 AL 41/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-al-41-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:32:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:32:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-al-41-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127626 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 AL 48/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-al-48-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:32:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:32:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-al-48-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127623 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 AL 22/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-al-22-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:32:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:32:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-al-22-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127620 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 R 40/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-r-40-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:32:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:32:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-r-40-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127617 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 275/21 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-275-21-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:32:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:32:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-275-21-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127614 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 R 368/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-r-368-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:31:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:31:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-r-368-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127611 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AS 194/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-as-194-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:31:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:31:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-as-194-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127608 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 R 428/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-r-428-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:31:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:31:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-r-428-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127605 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 R 686/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-r-686-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:31:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:31:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-r-686-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127685 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 KA 29/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ka-29-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:32:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:32:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ka-29-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => fe543e8fa21a24c83c3533ebd17ebe6e [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:a7c4e3edde2dbd609782e72e1a82b927:0.93342900 1749818464 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.