| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 33 VE 50/13 | 09.08.2016 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 11 VE 58/16 | 18.02.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 6 AS 794/16 | 13.08.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 25 AS 1720/18 | 03.06.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 173 AS 7557/19 WA | 01.12.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 25 AS 43/21 | 22.02.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 55 AS 832/16 | 10.05.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 25 AS 1035/19 | 23.11.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 33 AS 774/16 | 24.05.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 25 AS 590/20 WA | 06.08.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 AS 60/21 R | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Mai 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 132 VS 28/17 | 16.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 11 VS 56/20 | 18.08.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 168 AS 15187/16 | 26.05.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 25 AS 1335/17 | 07.06.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 135 AS 9851/18 | 02.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 25 AS 1638/20 | 17.01.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 28 R 601/18 | 16.06.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 33 R 506/20 | 09.06.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Mai 2022 | ||
| - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 37 SF 271/19 EK AS | 09.06.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Mai 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 136 AS 10187/16 | 16.03.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 34 AS 850/17 | 09.06.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 71 KR 372/16 | 03.05.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 26 BA 61/19 | 04.06.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 36 BA 159/19 | 29.11.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 26 BA 1/20 | 19.03.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 20 KR 197/11 | 15.05.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 26 KR 227/19 | 01.03.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 28 KR 176/21 ER | 06.12.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 28 KR 8/22 BER | 07.04.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 193 KR 160/16 | 07.11.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 26 BA 7/20 | 01.03.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 193 KR 160/16 | 07.11.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 26 BA 7/20 | 01.03.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 196 U 385/14 | 05.06.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 U 149/19 | 15.06.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Mai 2022 | ||
| - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 37 SF 266/19 EK AS | 28.01.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 ÜG 5/22 BH | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Mai 2022 | ||
| - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 37 SF 284/19 EK AS | 28.01.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 ÜG 5/22 BH | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Mai 2022 | ||
| - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 37 SF 284/19 EK AS | 28.01.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 ÜG 5/22 BH | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 42 KR 90/17 | 02.05.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 26 KR 228/19 | 19.03.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 166 KR 1726/16 | 27.01.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 28 KR 236/19 | 26.02.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 122 KR 3704/15 | 26.11.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 26 KR 77/20 | 19.03.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 17 R 401/18 | 28.07.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 33 R 703/20 NZB | 17.03.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Mai 2022 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 234 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 234 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 234 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 5825, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127382 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 VE 58/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-ve-58-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:29:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:29:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-ve-58-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127378 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 25 AS 1720/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-25-as-1720-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:29:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:29:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-25-as-1720-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127375 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 25 AS 43/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-25-as-43-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:29:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:29:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-25-as-43-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127372 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 25 AS 1035/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-25-as-1035-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:29:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:29:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-25-as-1035-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127369 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 25 AS 590/20 WA [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-25-as-590-20-wa [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:29:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:29:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-25-as-590-20-wa/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127366 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 VS 56/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-vs-56-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:29:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:29:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-vs-56-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127364 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 25 AS 1335/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-25-as-1335-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:29:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:29:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-25-as-1335-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127361 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 25 AS 1638/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-25-as-1638-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:29:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:29:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-25-as-1638-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127358 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 33 R 506/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-33-r-506-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:29:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:29:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-33-r-506-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127355 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 37 SF 271/19 EK AS [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-37-sf-271-19-ek-as [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:29:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:29:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-37-sf-271-19-ek-as/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127350 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 34 AS 850/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-34-as-850-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:29:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:29:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-34-as-850-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127347 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 26 BA 61/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-26-ba-61-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:29:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:29:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-26-ba-61-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127344 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 26 BA 1/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-26-ba-1-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:29:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:29:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-26-ba-1-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127339 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 26 KR 227/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-26-kr-227-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:29:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:29:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-26-kr-227-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127336 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 28 KR 8/22 BER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-28-kr-8-22-ber [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:29:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:29:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-28-kr-8-22-ber/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127334 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 26 BA 7/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-26-ba-7-20-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:29:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:29:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-26-ba-7-20-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127333 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 26 BA 7/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-26-ba-7-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:29:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:29:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-26-ba-7-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127331 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 149/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-149-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:29:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:29:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-149-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127328 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 37 SF 266/19 EK AS [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-37-sf-266-19-ek-as [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:29:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:29:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-37-sf-266-19-ek-as/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127325 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 37 SF 284/19 EK AS [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-37-sf-284-19-ek-as [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:29:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:29:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-37-sf-284-19-ek-as/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127324 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 37 SF 284/19 EK AS [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-37-sf-284-19-ek-as [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:29:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:29:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-37-sf-284-19-ek-as/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127321 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 26 KR 228/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-26-kr-228-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:29:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:29:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-26-kr-228-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127317 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 28 KR 236/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-28-kr-236-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:29:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:29:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-28-kr-236-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127316 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 26 KR 77/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-26-kr-77-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:29:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:29:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-26-kr-77-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127313 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 33 R 703/20 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-33-r-703-20-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:29:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:29:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-33-r-703-20-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127382 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 VE 58/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-ve-58-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:29:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:29:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-ve-58-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 445fd52bdf156d2258b978755c326832 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:2c9f5f40856b5b9276b49ba84459aa1c:0.00990200 1749943317 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.