| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 187 U 12/16 | 03.01.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 U 54/18 | 10.08.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Mai 2022 | ||
| - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 37 SF 55/20 EK AS | 17.02.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Mai 2022 | ||||
| - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 37 SF 156/20 EK SF | 17.02.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Mai 2022 | ||||
| - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 37 SF 123/20 EK AS | 17.02.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Mai 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 182 KR 593/16 | 19.11.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 26 KR 46/20 | 04.06.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 208 KR 935/16 | 25.09.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 28 KR 349/18 | 29.01.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 1 R 510//16 | 17.10.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 33 R 747/18 | 27.01.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Mai 2022 | ||
| - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 28 KR 329/20 KL | 24.09.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Mai 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 27 KR 286/17 | 27.11.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 26 BA 6/20 | 05.11.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Mai 2022 | ||
| - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 SF 248/20 AB RG | 05.03.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Mai 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 37 AS 4793/21 ER | 03.08.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 19 AS 929/21 B ER | 21.10.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 208 KR 565/19 | 09.06.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 262/20 | 05.02.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 6 AL 193/19 | 29.06.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AL 65/21 | 11.11.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 22 R 180/21 ER | 07.10.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 16 R 585/21 B ER | 29.10.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 51 KR 1628/19 | 30.07.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 336/20 | 13.01.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 76 KR 1453/16 | 20.11.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 28 BA 122/18 | 25.06.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 168 AS 6566/21 ER | 17.11.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AS 1367/21 B ER | 01.12.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 36 KR 2437/14 | 18.05.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 195/18 | 27.01.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 36 KR 1242/17 | 21.09.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 28 BA 110/18 | 25.06.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 81 KR 2184/18 | 16.09.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 370/19 | 22.02.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 4 KR 195/15 | 24.05.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 26 KR 225/19 | 04.06.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 211 KR 2086/14 | 12.04.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 242/17 | 26.11.2020 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 7 KR 159/13 | 08.09.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 439/17 | 15.01.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 169 KR 2034/16 | 09.10.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 368/18 | 27.01.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 56 KR 464/19 | 24.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 424/19 | 26.01.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Mai 2022 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 235 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 235 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 235 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 5850, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127308 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 54/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-54-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:29:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:29:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-54-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127305 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 37 SF 55/20 EK AS [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-37-sf-55-20-ek-as [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:29:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:29:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-37-sf-55-20-ek-as/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127302 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 37 SF 156/20 EK SF [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-37-sf-156-20-ek-sf [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:29:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:29:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-37-sf-156-20-ek-sf/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127299 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 37 SF 123/20 EK AS [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-37-sf-123-20-ek-as [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:29:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:29:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-37-sf-123-20-ek-as/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127296 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 26 KR 46/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-26-kr-46-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:29:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:29:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-26-kr-46-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127288 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 28 KR 349/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-28-kr-349-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:28:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:28:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-28-kr-349-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127285 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 33 R 747/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-33-r-747-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:28:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:28:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-33-r-747-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127279 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 28 KR 329/20 KL [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-28-kr-329-20-kl [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:28:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:28:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-28-kr-329-20-kl/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127275 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 26 BA 6/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-26-ba-6-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:28:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:28:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-26-ba-6-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127271 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 SF 248/20 AB RG [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-sf-248-20-ab-rg [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:28:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:28:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-sf-248-20-ab-rg/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127268 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 AS 929/21 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-as-929-21-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:28:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:28:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-as-929-21-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127265 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 262/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-262-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:28:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:28:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-262-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127260 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 AL 65/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-al-65-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:28:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:28:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-al-65-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127257 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 R 585/21 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-r-585-21-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:28:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:28:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-r-585-21-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127255 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 336/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-336-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:28:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:28:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-336-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127252 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 28 BA 122/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-28-ba-122-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:28:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:28:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-28-ba-122-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127250 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 AS 1367/21 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-as-1367-21-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:28:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:28:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-as-1367-21-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127247 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 195/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-195-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:28:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:28:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-195-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127243 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 28 BA 110/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-28-ba-110-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:28:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:28:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-28-ba-110-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127240 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 370/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-370-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:28:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:28:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-370-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127237 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 26 KR 225/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-26-kr-225-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:28:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:28:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-26-kr-225-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127234 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 242/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-242-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:28:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:28:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-242-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127231 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 439/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-439-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:28:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:28:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-439-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127229 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 368/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-368-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:28:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:28:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-368-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127226 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 424/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-424-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:28:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:28:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-424-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127308 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 54/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-54-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:29:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:29:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-54-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 627a08824e94338aef537ac8035ff5a2 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:b91d929f18de6410187d8f7259e94b20:0.26500500 1749993472 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.