| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 33 AS 1963/18 | 13.08.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 AS 1779/19 | 10.08.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Mai 2022 | ||
| S115 U 113/19 | 08.01.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 U 28/20 | 08.06.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Mai 2022 | |||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 72 KR 2173/18 | 02.08.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 322/20 | 26.01.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 88 SO 892/21 ER | 06.07.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 15 SO 184/21 B ER | 13.08.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 81 KR 1827/13 | 13.03.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 167/17 | 13.01.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 91 KR 612/17 | 21.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 399/19 | 27.01.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 187 AY 100/21 ER | 12.08.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 15 AY 21/21 B ER | 05.10.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 42 KR 211/20 ER | 03.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 462/20 B ER | 15.01.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 99 AS 30606/11 | 14.10.2014 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 32 AS 2716/14 | 15.07.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 134 AS 2702/20 | 07.10.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 8 AS 1486/20 | 30.09.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 211 KR 270/20 | 28.05.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 28 KR 362/21 NZB | 25.01.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 81 BA 32/18 | 25.02.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 BA 28/19 | 25.01.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 42 KR 364/18 | 22.01.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 28 KR 113/20 | 18.03.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 18 KR 11/22 ER | 02.02.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 4 KR 40/22 B ER | 07.04.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 13. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 23 R 2289/16 | 31.10.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 33 R 837/18 | 25.03.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 13. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 198 KR 3083/18 | 29.01.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 26 KR 94/21 | 01.03.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 13. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 46 SO 503/20 | 04.12.2020 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 12. Mai 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht München | S 38 KA 201/20 | 30.03.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 12. Mai 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 4 R 489/16 | 29.10.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 R 411/18 | 14.12.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 2/22 R | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 12. Mai 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 4 R 489/16 | 29.10.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 R 411/18 | 14.12.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 2/22 R | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 12. Mai 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 4 R 489/16 | 29.10.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 R 411/18 | 14.12.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 2/22 R | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 12. Mai 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 2 U 185/19 | 03.02.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 17 U 65/20 | 20.01.2022 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 12. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 52 AY 278/21 ER | 19.10.2021 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 AY 103/21 B ER | 18.01.2022 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 12. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 28 KR 43/17 | 23.03.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 26 KR 208/20 | 01.03.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 12. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 4 R 461/18 ZV | 15.12.2021 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 R 44/22 ZV | 05.05.2022 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 11. Mai 2022 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 236 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 236 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 236 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 5875, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127223 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 1779/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-1779-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:28:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:28:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-1779-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127220 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 28/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-28-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:28:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:28:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-28-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127217 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 322/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-322-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:28:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:28:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-322-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127214 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 SO 184/21 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-so-184-21-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:28:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:28:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-so-184-21-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127211 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 167/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-167-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:28:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:28:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-167-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127208 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 399/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-399-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:28:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:28:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-399-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127205 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 AY 21/21 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-ay-21-21-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:28:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:28:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-ay-21-21-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127202 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 462/20 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-462-20-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:28:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:28:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-462-20-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127199 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 32 AS 2716/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-32-as-2716-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:28:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:28:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-32-as-2716-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127194 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 AS 1486/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-as-1486-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:28:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:28:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-as-1486-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127191 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 28 KR 362/21 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-28-kr-362-21-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:28:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:28:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-28-kr-362-21-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127188 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 BA 28/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-ba-28-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:28:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:28:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-ba-28-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127184 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 28 KR 113/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-28-kr-113-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:27:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:27:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-28-kr-113-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127181 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 40/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-40-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:27:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:27:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-40-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127179 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 33 R 837/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-33-r-837-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:27:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:27:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-33-r-837-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127176 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 26 KR 94/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-26-kr-94-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:27:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:27:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-26-kr-94-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143444 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 46 SO 503/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-46-so-503-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:39:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:39:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-46-so-503-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143440 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 38 KA 201/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-38-ka-201-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:39:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:39:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-38-ka-201-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136820 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 R 411/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-r-411-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:41:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:41:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-r-411-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136816 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 4 R 489/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-4-r-489-16-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:41:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:41:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-4-r-489-16-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136815 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 4 R 489/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-4-r-489-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:41:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:41:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-4-r-489-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130677 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 17 U 65/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-17-u-65-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:07:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:07:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-17-u-65-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130676 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 AY 103/21 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ay-103-21-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:07:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:07:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ay-103-21-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127173 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 26 KR 208/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-26-kr-208-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:27:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:27:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-26-kr-208-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160702 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 44/22 ZV [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-44-22-zv [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:26:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:26:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-44-22-zv/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127223 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 1779/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-1779-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:28:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:28:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-1779-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => bf79e6a409655d32a187213db770e666 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:535e306a733452b2e256cd6620d4a144:0.83772000 1749992132 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.