| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 24 R 784/18 | 25.11.2021 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 R 587/21 ZV | 05.05.2022 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 11. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 11 R 685/18 ZV | 19.10.2021 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 R 553/21 ZV | 05.05.2022 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 11. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 4 U 227/18 | 08.10.2019 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 U 167/19 | 02.03.2022 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 11. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 51 AS 1661/17 | 28.09.2018 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 977/18 | 05.05.2022 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 11. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 5 U 15/16 | 24.04.2017 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 U 96/17 | 02.02.2022 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 11. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 4 RS 984/17 | 23.09.2021 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 R 479/21 | 25.04.2022 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 11. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 32 AS 402/14 | 11.12.2018 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 AS 1183/18 | 10.03.2022 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 11. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 10 R 802/14 | 05.08.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 BA 153/21 | 01.02.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 11. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 53 AS 1317/19 | 29.09.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 15 AS 303/21 | 19.10.2021 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 9. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 46 SO 304/17 | 07.04.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 6. Mai 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht München | S 38 KA 300/19 | 16.03.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 6. Mai 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 7 AL 220/21 | 25.03.2022 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 AL 62/22 B | - | - | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 6. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 1 U 14/15 | 23.02.2016 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 86/20 | 22.02.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Kassel | 6. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 1 U 14/15 | 23.02.2016 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 86/20 | 22.02.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Kassel | 6. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 30 AY 6/19 | 28.04.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 5. Mai 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 30 AY 8/22 ER | 26.04.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 5. Mai 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 17 SO 36/21 SDE | 28.04.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 SO 119/21 | 16.03.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 5. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 18 KR 575/17 | 24.07.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 412/20 | 17.03.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 5. Mai 2022 | ||
| S 20 SF 163/19 E | 23.11.2020 | - | - | Sozialgericht Altenburg | 5. Mai 2022 | |||||
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 1 AS 98/21 ER | 07.12.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AS 585/21 B ER | 21.02.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Kassel | 4. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 7 AS 3314/14 | 13.03.2017 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 9 AS 301/17 B | 02.03.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 2. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Osnabrück | S 17 U 293/14 | 30.11.2017 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 14 U 324/17 | 20.01.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 2. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 36 U 240/15 | 07.09.2018 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 14 U 243/18 | 17.02.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 2. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Oldenburg | S 71 U 137/16 | 08.11.2019 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 14 U 183/19 | 17.02.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 2. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 20 KA 97/13 | 24.05.2017 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 3 KA 53/17 | 02.02.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 2. Mai 2022 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 237 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 237 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 237 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 5900, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160699 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 587/21 ZV [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-587-21-zv [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:25:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:25:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-587-21-zv/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160695 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 553/21 ZV [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-553-21-zv [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:25:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:25:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-553-21-zv/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160692 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 U 167/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-u-167-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:25:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:25:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-u-167-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160689 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 977/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-977-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:25:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:25:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-977-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160686 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 U 96/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-u-96-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:25:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:25:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-u-96-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160683 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 479/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-479-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:25:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:25:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-479-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160680 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 AS 1183/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-as-1183-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:25:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:25:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-as-1183-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143396 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 R 802/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-r-802-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:39:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:39:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-r-802-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130675 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 AS 303/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-as-303-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:07:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:07:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-as-303-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143437 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 46 SO 304/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-46-so-304-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:39:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:39:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-46-so-304-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143433 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 38 KA 300/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-38-ka-300-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:39:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:39:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-38-ka-300-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140295 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 7 AL 220/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-7-al-220-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:17:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:17:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-7-al-220-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139186 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 1 U 14/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-1-u-14-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:07:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:07:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-1-u-14-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139181 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 86/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-86-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:07:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:07:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-86-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136811 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 30 AY 6/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-30-ay-6-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:41:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:41:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-30-ay-6-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136806 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 30 AY 8/22 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-30-ay-8-22-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:41:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:41:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-30-ay-8-22-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136701 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 17 SO 36/21 SDE [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-17-so-36-21-sde [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:40:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:40:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-17-so-36-21-sde/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136696 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 KR 575/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-kr-575-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:40:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:40:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-kr-575-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132181 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 SF 163/19 E [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-sf-163-19-e [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:04:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:04:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-sf-163-19-e/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139169 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 585/21 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-585-21-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:07:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:07:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-585-21-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138121 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AS 301/17 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-as-301-17-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:00:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:00:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-as-301-17-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138116 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 U 324/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-u-324-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:00:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:00:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-u-324-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138112 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 U 243/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-u-243-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:00:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:00:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-u-243-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138107 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 U 183/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-u-183-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:00:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:00:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-u-183-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138102 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 KA 53/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-ka-53-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:00:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:00:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-ka-53-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160699 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 587/21 ZV [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-587-21-zv [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:25:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:25:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-587-21-zv/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => a4276e90a9ced4ff3a433a623adfd71d [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:5132f8d3a0f0648adc14fa5bf62c62b9:0.66398400 1750034855 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.