| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Oldenburg | S 71 U 215/14 | 08.02.2017 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 14 U 102/17 | 20.01.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 2. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Oldenburg | S 71 U 215/14 | 08.02.2017 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 14 U 102/17 | 20.01.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 2. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hildesheim | S 24 AS 4116/21 ER | 04.08.2021 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 11 AS 479/21 B ER | 16.02.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 2. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Braunschweig | S 57 AS 334/20 | 14.09.2020 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 11 AS 578/20 | 03.02.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 2. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 32 EG 5/18 | 07.05.2021 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 2 EG 5/21 | 07.02.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 2. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Lüneburg | S 8 EG 1/19 | 26.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 2 EG 4/20 | 24.01.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 2. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 13 R 721/15 | 09.05.2018 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 1 R 251/18 | 26.01.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 2. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aurich | S 33 U 28/15 | 17.10.2017 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 14 U 294/17 | 20.01.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 2. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Osnabrück | S 17 U 287/13 | 29.05.2017 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 14 U 164/17 | 18.11.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 2. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aurich | S 3 U 35/18 | 01.04.2020 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 14 U 107/20 | 20.01.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 2. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Bremen | S 18 U 186/03 | 15.11.2005 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 14 U 53/21 WA | 25.01.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 2. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 22 U 263/15 | 03.01.2017 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 14 U 43/17 | 21.10.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 2. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Oldenburg | S 62 KR 811/19 | 01.12.2020 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 16 KR 31/21 | 13.01.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 2. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 11 KR 548/17 | 23.09.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 429/20 | 17.03.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Gießen | 2. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 11 KR 548/17 | 23.09.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 429/20 | 17.03.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Gießen | 2. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 15 BL 3/18 | 30.07.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 15 BL 12/20 | 22.03.2022 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 2. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 24 U 340/15 | 01.09.2017 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 297/17 | 23.03.2022 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 2. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Braunschweig | S 36 R 298/21 | 11.01.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Braunschweig | 2. Mai 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 11 SO 3998/21 ER | 15.12.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 SO 151/22 ER-B | 16.02.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 29. April 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 29 KR 1965/21 ER | 16.12.2021 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 29. April 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Kiel | S 40 AS 610/16 | 20.05.2019 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AS89/19 | 24.02.2022 | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 28. April 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 31 KR 853/14 | 23.01.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 16 KR 265/19 | 27.01.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 28. April 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 31 KR 2733/19 | 16.12.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 10 KR 208/21 KH | 16.02.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 38/22 B | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 28. April 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 29 SO 236/17 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 9 SO 333/19 | 09.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 28. April 2022 | |
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 39 R 879/13 | 24.04.2015 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 3 R 469/15 | 15.12.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 28. April 2022 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 238 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 238 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 238 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 5925, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138095 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 U 102/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-u-102-17-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:00:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:00:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-u-102-17-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138094 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 U 102/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-u-102-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:00:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:00:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-u-102-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138089 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 AS 479/21 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-as-479-21-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:00:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:00:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-as-479-21-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138084 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 AS 578/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-as-578-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:00:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:00:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-as-578-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138079 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 EG 5/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-eg-5-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:00:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:00:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-eg-5-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138075 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 EG 4/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-eg-4-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:00:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:00:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-eg-4-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138070 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 R 251/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-r-251-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:00:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:00:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-r-251-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138065 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 U 294/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-u-294-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:00:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:00:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-u-294-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138060 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 U 164/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-u-164-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:00:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:00:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-u-164-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138052 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 U 107/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-u-107-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:00:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:00:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-u-107-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138047 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 U 53/21 WA [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-u-53-21-wa [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:00:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:00:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-u-53-21-wa/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138043 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 U 43/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-u-43-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:00:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:00:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-u-43-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138027 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 KR 31/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-kr-31-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:00:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:00:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-kr-31-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134937 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 KR 548/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-kr-548-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:26:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:26:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-kr-548-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134936 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 429/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-429-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:26:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:26:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-429-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130674 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 BL 12/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-bl-12-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:07:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:07:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-bl-12-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130673 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 297/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-297-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:07:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:07:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-297-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 71276 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 36 R 298/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-36-r-298-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 15:39:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 14:39:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-36-r-298-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156851 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 SO 151/22 ER-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-so-151-22-er-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:39:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:39:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-so-151-22-er-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143429 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 29 KR 1965/21 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-29-kr-1965-21-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:39:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:39:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-29-kr-1965-21-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150356 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 89/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-89-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:49:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:49:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-89-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147036 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 KR 265/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-kr-265-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:19:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:19:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-kr-265-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147032 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 KR 208/21 KH [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-kr-208-21-kh [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:19:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:19:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-kr-208-21-kh/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147027 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 SO 333/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-so-333-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:19:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:19:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-so-333-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147022 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 469/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-469-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:19:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:19:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-469-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138095 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 U 102/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-u-102-17-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:00:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:00:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-u-102-17-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => d628008626dc1fdd020b2bfbd9927c91 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:2aeb71ba31e569db8f9c2dd128aa5585:0.10978500 1750034364 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.