| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Bayreuth | S 10 AL 187/18 | 04.08.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 10 AL 109/20 | 26.10.2021 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 28. April 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 7 AL 220/21 | 25.03.2022 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 AL 62/22 B | 25.04.2022 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 28. April 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 174 AS 2778/18 | 14.10.2020 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 14 AS 89/20 R | 11.11.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 28. April 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 29 AS 173/15 | 23.01.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 7 AS 535/19 | 13.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 14 AS 73/20 R | 14.12.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 28. April 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Münster | S 10 U 319/16 | 01.03.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 10 U 204/18 | 21.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 10/20 R | 08.12.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 28. April 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 6 U 5/19 | 14.06.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 17 U 487/19 | 09.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 4/21 R | 08.12.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 28. April 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Oldenburg | S 62 KR 77/17 | 14.08.2017 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 4 KR 427/17 | 18.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 2/21 R | 10.03.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 28. April 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 13 U 301/19 | 30.04.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 17 U 285/21 | 30.03.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 27. April 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 33 AS 1888/21 | 16.12.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 21 AS 87/22 B | 09.03.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 27. April 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 41 AS 1325/20 | 07.12.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 12 AS 18/22 NZB | 28.02.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 27. April 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Münster | S 20 SO 85/18 | 18.02.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 12 SO 111/20 | 11.08.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 28/21 BH | 23.03.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 27. April 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 27 AS 6549/15 | 04.06.2019 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 833/19 | 07.04.2022 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 26. April 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 6 AS 1980/21 ER | 21.01.2022 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AS 86/22 B ER | 28.03.2022 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 26. April 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 50 R 911/19 ZV | 02.11.2021 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 R 578/21 ZV | 07.04.2022 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 26. April 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 40 KA 20/15 | 04.12.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 11 KA 2/20 | 24.11.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 26. April 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 2 SO 2888/20 | 29.03.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | 26. April 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 3 U 2936/15 | 06.10.2017 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 U 555/18 | 19.10.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 25. April 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 8 P 2636/17 | 13.09.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 P 4005/18 | 25.03.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 25. April 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 5 KR 4243/16 | 18.01.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 KR 983/19 | 25.03.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 25. April 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 1 R 2707/16 | 23.01.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 13 BA 652/19 | 08.12.2020 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 25. April 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 53 AS 225/21 | 08.09.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 7 AS 1526/21 NZB | 21.03.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 25. April 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 49 R 20/15 | 30.11.2017 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 3 R 108/18 | 06.10.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 25. April 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 7 R 1591/12 | 30.06.2014 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 3 R 693/14 | 15.12.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 25. April 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 40 KA 12/15 | 04.12.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 11 KA 1/20 | 24.11.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 25. April 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 17 SO 36/21 SDE | 28.04.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 SO 119/21 | 16.03.2022 | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 25. April 2022 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 239 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 239 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 239 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 5950, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130672 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 AL 109/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-al-109-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:07:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:07:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-al-109-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130671 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AL 62/22 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-al-62-22-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:07:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:07:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-al-62-22-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87769 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 14 AS 89/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-14-as-89-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:10:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:10:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-14-as-89-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87768 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 14 AS 73/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-14-as-73-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:10:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:10:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-14-as-73-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87767 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 10/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-10-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:10:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:10:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-10-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87766 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 4/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-4-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:10:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:10:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-4-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87765 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 2/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-2-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:10:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:10:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-2-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147017 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 17 U 285/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-17-u-285-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:19:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:19:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-17-u-285-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147012 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 21 AS 87/22 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-21-as-87-22-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:19:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:19:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-21-as-87-22-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147008 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 AS 18/22 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-as-18-22-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:19:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:19:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-as-18-22-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147003 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 SO 111/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-so-111-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:19:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:19:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-so-111-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160677 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 833/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-833-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:25:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:25:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-833-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160674 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 86/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-86-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:25:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:25:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-86-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160670 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 578/21 ZV [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-578-21-zv [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:25:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:25:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-578-21-zv/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146998 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KA 2/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-ka-2-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:19:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:19:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-ka-2-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140071 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 2 SO 2888/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-2-so-2888-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:14:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:14:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-2-so-2888-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156847 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 U 555/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-u-555-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:39:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:39:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-u-555-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156843 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 P 4005/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-p-4005-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:39:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:39:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-p-4005-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156839 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 983/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-983-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:39:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:39:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-983-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156835 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 BA 652/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-ba-652-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:39:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:39:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-ba-652-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146993 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 1526/21 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-1526-21-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:19:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:19:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-1526-21-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146988 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 108/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-108-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:19:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:19:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-108-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146983 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 693/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-693-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:19:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:19:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-693-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146978 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KA 1/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-ka-1-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:19:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:19:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-ka-1-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130559 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 SO 119/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-so-119-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:04:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:04:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-so-119-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130672 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 AL 109/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-al-109-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:07:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:07:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-al-109-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => aabf08d1d3d0dcc4604f5869059e6590 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:30853f9e7560886532cc96c6ea85db40:0.36323200 1750070664 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.