Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 4 SO 2393/23 | 05.02.2024 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 SO 584/24 | 07.08.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 11. September 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 4 SO 516/23 | 15.02.2024 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 SO 583/24 | 19.06.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 11. September 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 4 SO 2187/22 | 05.02.2024 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 SO 551/24 | 19.06.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 11. September 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 9 SO 3378/23 ER | 09.02.2024 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 SO 548/24 ER-B | 22.04.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 11. September 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 2 AS 281/22 | 27.07.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 AS 2471/23 | 18.07.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 11. September 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Detmold | S 3 KR 357/21 | 26.11.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 10 KR 7/22 KH | 17.01.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 11. September 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 26 R 67/21 | 17.11.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 18 R 1044/21 | 05.03.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 11. September 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 179 AS 7807/20 | 20.12.2023 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 25 AS 99/24 | 22.08.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 11. September 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 9 SB 238/19 | 04.03.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 11 SB 191/22 | 08.08.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 11. September 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 6 KR 1720/20 | 24.09.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 3297/21 | 02.08.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 4/22 R | 23.04.2024 | Bundessozialgericht | 11. September 2024 |
- | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 7 KA 19/22 KL | 26.04.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 10/23 R | 05.06.2024 | Bundessozialgericht | 11. September 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 105 P 224/22 | 23.02.2024 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 P 51/24 | 18.07.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 10. September 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Münster | S 4 KA 5/19 | 14.09.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 11 KA 36/20 | 10.04.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 10. September 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 4 BA 12/22 ER | 12.07.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 BA 114/22 B ER | - | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 10. September 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht München | S 42 AY 63/24 ER | 29.08.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 10. September 2024 | ||||
Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 19 SO 63/22 | 01.12.2022 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 SO 12/23 | 13.07.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 56/23 BH | 28.05.2024 | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 10. September 2024 |
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 93 AS 8546/16 | 16.06.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 20 AS 1065/20 | 30.11.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 10. September 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 201 AS 2345/20 | 21.09.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 29 AS 1304/21 | 29.02.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 10. September 2024 | ||
Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 20 AS 2306/19 KL | 21.09.2023 | - | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 10. September 2024 | ||||
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 25 U 16/15 | 23.02.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 21 U 202/21 ZVW | 30.01.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 10. September 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 33 KR 68/24 | 07.03.2024 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 14 KR 129/24 | 23.07.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 10. September 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 21 KR 65/22 | 31.03.2023 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 28 KR 228/23 B | 23.07.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 10. September 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 40 SB 29/19 | 26.08.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 11 SB 200/21 | 06.08.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 10. September 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Hannover | S 86 KR 2589/18 | 18.09.2019 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 16/4 KR 536/19 | 15.11.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 40/22 R | 16.05.2024 | Bundessozialgericht | 10. September 2024 |
Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 7 KR 181/21 | 21.10.2021 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 20 KR 611/21 | 11.09.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 44/23 B | - | Sozialgericht Nürnberg | 9. September 2024 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 24 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 24 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 24 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 575, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160900 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 SO 584/24 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-so-584-24 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:29:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:29:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-so-584-24/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160898 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 SO 583/24 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-so-583-24 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:28:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:28:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-so-583-24/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160895 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 SO 551/24 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-so-551-24 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:28:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:28:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-so-551-24/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160892 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 SO 548/24 ER-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-so-548-24-er-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:28:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:28:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-so-548-24-er-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160890 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 2471/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-2471-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:28:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:28:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-2471-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150870 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 KR 7/22 KH [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-kr-7-22-kh [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:58:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:58:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-kr-7-22-kh/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150868 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 R 1044/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-r-1044-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:58:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:58:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-r-1044-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129699 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 25 AS 99/24 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-25-as-99-24 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:52:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:52:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-25-as-99-24/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129693 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 SB 191/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-sb-191-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:52:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:52:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-sb-191-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88143 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 KR 4/22 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-kr-4-22-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:21:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:21:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-kr-4-22-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88142 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 10/23 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-10-23-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:21:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:21:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-10-23-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150866 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 P 51/24 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-p-51-24 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:58:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:58:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-p-51-24/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150864 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KA 36/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-ka-36-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:58:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:58:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-ka-36-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150861 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 BA 114/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ba-114-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:58:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:58:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ba-114-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144030 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 42 AY 63/24 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-42-ay-63-24-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:46:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:46:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-42-ay-63-24-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140383 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 19 SO 63/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-19-so-63-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:18:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:18:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-19-so-63-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129690 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 20 AS 1065/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-20-as-1065-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:52:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:52:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-20-as-1065-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129687 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 29 AS 1304/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-29-as-1304-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:52:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:52:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-29-as-1304-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129684 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 20 AS 2306/19 KL [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-20-as-2306-19-kl [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:52:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:52:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-20-as-2306-19-kl/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129681 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 21 U 202/21 ZVW [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-21-u-202-21-zvw [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:52:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:52:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-21-u-202-21-zvw/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129678 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 KR 129/24 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-kr-129-24 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:52:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:52:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-kr-129-24/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129675 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 28 KR 228/23 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-28-kr-228-23-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:52:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:52:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-28-kr-228-23-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129672 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 SB 200/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-sb-200-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:52:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:52:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-sb-200-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88141 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 40/22 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-40-22-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:21:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:21:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-40-22-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134911 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 7 KR 181/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-7-kr-181-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:26:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:26:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-7-kr-181-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160900 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 SO 584/24 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-so-584-24 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:29:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:29:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-so-584-24/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 59cb72967d816b17f6b8be344a8455e2 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:4653830d57361e991ad84f6b23a6b2d9:0.20491400 1745118894 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.