| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Kiel | S 44 BA 528/18 | 19.11.2018 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 10 BA 52/18 | 07.12.2021 | B 12 BA 2/22 R | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 22. April 2022 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 15 KR 927/21 | 17.03.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 22. April 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht München | S 21 BA 122/21 | 15.03.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 22. April 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Würzburg | S 9 AY 14/22 ER | 04.02.2022 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 AY 34/22 B ER | 11.04.2022 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 22. April 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Lübeck | S 1 KR 314/13 | 10.05.2016 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 113/16 | 17.10.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 14/20 R | 17.02.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 22. April 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Lübeck | S 1 KR 313/13 | 10.05.2016 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 112/16 | 17.10.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 13/20 R | 17.02.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 22. April 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 8 U 1523/17 | 25.07.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 U 2959/19 | 03.08.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 21. April 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 9 VH 3486/18 | 15.10.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 VH 3682/20 | 13.01.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 21. April 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 3 U 2307/17 | 16.12.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 3 U 278/21 | 21.07.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 21. April 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 17 R 1141/19 | 15.10.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 R 3632/20 | 25.08.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 21. April 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 8 SO 1793/16 | 29.03.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 SO 1541/19 | 20.01.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 21. April 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 6 AS 2498/13 | 10.01.2017 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 12 AS 1706/20 ZVW | 15.12.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 21. April 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 49 BA 63/19 | 06.03.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 BA 51/20 | 26.01.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 21. April 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 43 AS 441/21 | 03.08.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 2 AS 1334/21 B | 16.02.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 21. April 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 20 BA 142/21 ER | 18.12.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 BA 16/22 B ER | 02.03.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 21. April 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 87 AS 4817/18 | 10.06.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 7 AS 1066/21 B | 24.02.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 21. April 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 13 AS 3475/21 ER | 29.11.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 7 AS 1828/21 B ER | 14.02.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 21. April 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 6 AS 1533/21 | 22.09.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 7 AS 1476/21 NZB | 07.03.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 21. April 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Altenburg | S 17 R 196/21 | 13.12.2021 | - | - | Sozialgericht Altenburg | 21. April 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Altenburg | S 30 AS 490/20 | 19.11.2021 | - | - | Sozialgericht Altenburg | 21. April 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 18 KR 575/17 | 24.07.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 412/20 | 17.03.2022 | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 21. April 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 16 R 1809/16 | 17.05.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 BA 2288/18 | 18.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 R 9/20 R | 19.10.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 21. April 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 12 R 6683/15 | 26.02.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 BA 1102/18 | 14.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 R 6/20 R | 19.10.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 21. April 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Mainz | S 15 SB 236/17 | 17.05.2019 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 4 SB 77/19 | 16.10.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 SB 7/19 R | 16.12.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 21. April 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Mainz | S 11 SB 384/17 | 22.05.2019 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 4 SB 69/19 | 16.10.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 SB 6/19 R | 16.12.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 21. April 2022 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 240 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 240 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 240 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 5975, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150352 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 BA 52/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-ba-52-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:49:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:49:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-ba-52-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143425 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 15 KR 927/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-15-kr-927-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:39:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:39:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-15-kr-927-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143421 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 21 BA 122/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-21-ba-122-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:39:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:39:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-21-ba-122-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130670 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 AY 34/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ay-34-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:07:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:07:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ay-34-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87764 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 KR 14/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-kr-14-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:10:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:10:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-kr-14-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87763 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 KR 13/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-kr-13-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:10:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:10:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-kr-13-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156831 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 U 2959/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-u-2959-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:39:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:39:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-u-2959-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156827 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 VH 3682/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-vh-3682-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:39:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:39:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-vh-3682-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156823 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 278/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-278-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:39:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:39:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-278-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156819 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 R 3632/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-r-3632-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:38:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:38:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-r-3632-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156815 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 SO 1541/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-so-1541-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:38:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:38:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-so-1541-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146973 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 AS 1706/20 ZVW [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-as-1706-20-zvw [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:19:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:19:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-as-1706-20-zvw/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146968 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 BA 51/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ba-51-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:19:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:19:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ba-51-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146961 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 1334/21 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-1334-21-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:19:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:19:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-1334-21-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146955 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 BA 16/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ba-16-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:19:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:19:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ba-16-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146951 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 1066/21 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-1066-21-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:18:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:18:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-1066-21-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146946 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 1828/21 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-1828-21-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:18:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:18:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-1828-21-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146941 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 1476/21 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-1476-21-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:18:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:18:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-1476-21-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132173 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 17 R 196/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-17-r-196-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:04:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:04:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-17-r-196-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132170 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 30 AS 490/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-30-as-490-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:04:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:04:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-30-as-490-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130557 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 412/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-412-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:04:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:04:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-412-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87762 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 R 9/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-r-9-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:10:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:10:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-r-9-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87761 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 R 6/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-r-6-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:10:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:10:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-r-6-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87760 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 9 SB 7/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-9-sb-7-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:10:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:10:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-9-sb-7-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87759 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 9 SB 6/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-9-sb-6-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:10:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:10:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-9-sb-6-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150352 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 BA 52/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-ba-52-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:49:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:49:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-ba-52-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 79680cd39a7679b35373061f10b2a292 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:799b77356eecbfcd3771671a3b17e63e:0.50135500 1750070518 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.