| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 16 AS 198/17 | 29.04.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 452/19 | 28.09.2021 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 7. April 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 24 U 29/16 | 10.07.2017 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 U 258/17 | 31.03.2022 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 7. April 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 43 KA 433/16 | 18.12.2018 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 12 KA 11/19 | 21.04.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 8/21 R | 26.01.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 7. April 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 2 KG 2/20 | 04.11.2021 | - | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 6. April 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 49 R 2396/15 | 09.10.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 3 R 886/18 | 24.11.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 6. April 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Münster | S 11 AS 352/21 ER | 18.08.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 7 AS 1374/21 B ER | 24.02.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 6. April 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 56 AS 1479/21 | 28.04.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 7 AS 974/21 B | 21.02.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 6. April 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 16 AS 2698/20 | 08.03.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | 6. April 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Würzburg | S 16 R 168/19 | 14.12.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 19 R 71/21 | 21.10.2021 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 6. April 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Koblenz | S 10 VJ 8/17 | 30.11.2018 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 4 VJ 1/19 | 10.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 V 2/20 R | 16.12.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 6. April 2022 |
| Sozialgericht für das Saarland | S 2 KA 46/17 | 22.07.2020 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 13/20 R | 04.11.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 6. April 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 10 SO 58/21 ER | 01.06.2021 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 SO 49/21 B ER | 22.03.2022 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 5. April 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 28 AS 2260/20 | 26.04.2021 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AS 570/21 B PKH | 10.03.2022 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 5. April 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Schleswig | S 33 AS 2/22 ER | 02.03.2022 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AS 29/22 B ER | 29.03.2022 | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 5. April 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 19 AS 1489/17 | 17.08.2017 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 12 AS 1846/17 | 10.03.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 14 AS 199/21 B | 01.02.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 5. April 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 48 SO 550/18 | 04.03.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 20 SO 174/21 | 31.01.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 5. April 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 8 KR 868/18 | 29.11.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 16 KR 868/18 | 09.12.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 4/22 R | 21.09.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 5. April 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 21 SO 248/21 ER | 06.12.2021 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 SO 2/22 B ER | 22.03.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 5. April 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 19 AL 414/18 | 10.06.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 10 AL 101/20 | 26.10.2021 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 5. April 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 5 AL 213/21 | 24.03.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 4. April 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Osnabrück | S 17 U 152/16 | 07.06.2018 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 14 U 172/18 | 16.12.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 4. April 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Bremen | S 2 U 94/16 | 16.03.2021 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 14 U 39/21 | 16.12.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 4. April 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Oldenburg | S 43 AS 41/19 | 08.08.2019 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 13 AS 264/19 | 08.12.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 4. April 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 18 KR 981/21 ER | 10.02.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Nürnberg | 4. April 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 9 SO 636/20 | 26.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 SO 4143/20 | 17.03.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 1. April 2022 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 244 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 244 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 244 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 6075, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130666 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 452/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-452-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:07:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:07:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-452-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130665 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 258/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-258-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:07:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:07:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-258-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87758 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 8/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-8-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:10:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:10:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-8-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149669 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 2 KG 2/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-2-kg-2-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:43:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:43:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-2-kg-2-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146871 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 886/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-886-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:18:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:18:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-886-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146866 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 1374/21 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-1374-21-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:18:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:18:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-1374-21-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146861 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 974/21 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-974-21-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:18:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:18:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-974-21-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140068 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 16 AS 2698/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-16-as-2698-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:14:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:14:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-16-as-2698-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130664 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 R 71/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-r-71-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:06:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:06:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-r-71-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87757 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 9 V 2/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-9-v-2-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:09:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:09:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-9-v-2-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87756 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 13/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-13-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:09:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:09:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-13-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160661 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 SO 49/21 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-so-49-21-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:25:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:25:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-so-49-21-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160658 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 570/21 B PKH [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-570-21-b-pkh [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:25:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:25:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-570-21-b-pkh/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150348 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 29/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-29-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:49:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:49:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-29-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146856 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 AS 1846/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-as-1846-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:18:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:18:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-as-1846-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146851 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 20 SO 174/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-20-so-174-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:18:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:18:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-20-so-174-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146846 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 KR 868/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-kr-868-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:18:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:18:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-kr-868-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143018 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 SO 2/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-so-2-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:36:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:36:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-so-2-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130663 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 AL 101/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-al-101-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:06:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:06:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-al-101-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140291 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 5 AL 213/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-5-al-213-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:17:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:17:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-5-al-213-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138012 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 U 172/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-u-172-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:00:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:00:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-u-172-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138007 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 U 39/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-u-39-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:00:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:00:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-u-39-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138002 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 AS 264/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-as-264-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:00:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:00:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-as-264-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134649 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 KR 981/21 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-kr-981-21-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:23:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:23:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-kr-981-21-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156658 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 SO 4143/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-so-4143-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:37:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:37:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-so-4143-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130666 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 452/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-452-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:07:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:07:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-452-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 73b157524eeee44b408c49d7ad91099d [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:364e91fb9ee90189f0532b19674fb905:0.10089200 1750121864 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.