| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 4 SO 1187/18 | 20.11.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 SO 59/19 | 17.03.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 1. April 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 2 AL 2876/15 | 01.03.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 SF 2522/21 EK AL | 16.03.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 1. April 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 6 R 1707/21 | 09.11.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 R 3787/21 | 16.03.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 1. April 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 17 R 1257/21 | 04.08.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 R 127/22 B | 28.02.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 1. April 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 5 SO 3625/16 | 19.06.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 SO 2228/20 | 16.02.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 1. April 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 10 SO 2663/20 | 17.02.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 SO 939/21 | 16.02.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 1. April 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 12 KA 1/22 | 28.03.2022 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KA 44/22 | - | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 1. April 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 38 KA 321/21 | 16.03.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 1. April 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht München | S 17 KR 1785/18 | 23.09.2020 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 1. April 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht München | S 59 KR 1471/19 | 17.02.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 1. April 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 9 R 596/19 | 14.10.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 19 R 534/20 | 03.11.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 322/21 B | 03.03.2022 | Sozialgericht Nürnberg | 1. April 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Altenburg | S 25 KG 1712/19 | 20.10.2020 | - | - | Sozialgericht Altenburg | 1. April 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Altenburg | S 25 KG 1742/18 | 16.06.2020 | - | - | Sozialgericht Altenburg | 1. April 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Altenburg | S 25 KG 1261/17 | 16.06.2020 | - | - | Sozialgericht Altenburg | 1. April 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Altenburg | S 25 KG 458/20 | 06.07.2021 | - | - | Sozialgericht Altenburg | 1. April 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht München | S 17 KR 1667/16 | 12.07.2018 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 494/18 | 16.06.2021 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 1. April 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 46 SO 503/20 | 04.12.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 SO 6/21 | 18.06.2021 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 1. April 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 2 R 3020/16 | 11.09.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 BA 3646/18 | 20.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 R 10/20 R | 19.10.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 1. April 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 20 R 97/16 | 02.11.2020 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 R 1/21 R | 19.10.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 1. April 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Fulda | S 1 R 103/17 | 22.11.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 487/17 | 11.04.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 29/19 R | 19.10.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 1. April 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Würzburg | S 10 VU 2/16 | 04.11.2016 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 20 VU 2/16 | 26.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 V 10/21 B | 16.12.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 1. April 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 24 R 5274/18 | 28.01.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 13 R 741/19 | 17.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 28/21 R | 21.10.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 1. April 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 12 KA 226/21 | 30.03.2022 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KA 54/22 | - | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 31. März 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Regensburg | S 14 KR 1078/20 | 16.10.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 543/20 | 29.06.2021 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 31. März 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 44 KR 2513/19 | 12.05.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 222/20 | 16.06.2021 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 31. März 2022 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 245 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 245 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 245 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 6100, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156655 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 SO 59/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-so-59-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:37:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:37:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-so-59-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156651 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 SF 2522/21 EK AL [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-sf-2522-21-ek-al [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:37:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:37:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-sf-2522-21-ek-al/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156647 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 R 3787/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-r-3787-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:37:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:37:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-r-3787-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156643 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 R 127/22 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-r-127-22-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:37:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:37:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-r-127-22-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156639 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 SO 2228/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-so-2228-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:36:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:36:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-so-2228-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156635 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 SO 939/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-so-939-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:36:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:36:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-so-939-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149663 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 KA 1/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-ka-1-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:43:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:43:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-ka-1-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143402 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 38 KA 321/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-38-ka-321-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:39:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:39:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-38-ka-321-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143398 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 17 KR 1785/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-17-kr-1785-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:39:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:39:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-17-kr-1785-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143394 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 59 KR 1471/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-59-kr-1471-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:39:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:39:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-59-kr-1471-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134645 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 R 596/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-r-596-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:23:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:23:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-r-596-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132163 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 25 KG 1712/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-25-kg-1712-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:04:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:04:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-25-kg-1712-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132157 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 25 KG 1742/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-25-kg-1742-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:04:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:04:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-25-kg-1742-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132154 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 25 KG 1261/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-25-kg-1261-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:04:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:04:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-25-kg-1261-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132150 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 25 KG 458/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-25-kg-458-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:04:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:04:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-25-kg-458-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130662 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 494/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-494-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:06:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:06:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-494-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130661 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 SO 6/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-so-6-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:06:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:06:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-so-6-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87755 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 R 10/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-r-10-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:09:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:09:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-r-10-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87754 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 R 1/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-r-1-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:09:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:09:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-r-1-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87753 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 KR 29/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-kr-29-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:09:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:09:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-kr-29-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87752 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 9 V 10/21 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-9-v-10-21-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:09:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:09:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-9-v-10-21-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87751 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 5 R 28/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-5-r-28-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:09:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:09:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-5-r-28-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149659 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-03-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-03-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 KA 226/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-ka-226-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:43:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:43:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-ka-226-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130660 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-03-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-03-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 543/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-543-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:06:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:06:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-543-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130659 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-03-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-03-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 222/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-222-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:06:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:06:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-222-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156655 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-04-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-04-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 SO 59/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-so-59-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:37:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:37:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-so-59-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 1b0573b6a09427362b19effecc0cbb87 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:2c28dc003fc6d098936b85bb0e971fca:0.37820800 1750456807 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.