| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht München | S 59 P 445/21 LP | 16.03.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 30. März 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht München | S 17 KR 1785/18 | 23.09.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 530/20 | 05.10.2021 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 30. März 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 2 AS 1470/21 ER | 30.11.2021 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AS 1157/21 B ER | 10.03.2022 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 29. März 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 24 R 427/18 ZV | 08.10.2021 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 R 525/21 ZV | 10.03.2022 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 29. März 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 4 RS 446/17 | 07.10.2021 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 R 508/21 ZV | 10.03.2022 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 29. März 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 15 KR 863/20 | 14.09.2021 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 326/21 B | 21.02.2022 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 29. März 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 26 R 570/18 ZV | 03.08.2021 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 R 474/21 ZV | 10.03.2022 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 29. März 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 10 SO 103/18 | 05.02.2019 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 SO 107/20 | 11.05.2021 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 29. März 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 10 SB 146/19 | 03.05.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 SB 1672/20 | 13.01.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 29. März 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 16 SO 6/20 | 23.09.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 SO 185/20 | 19.01.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 29. März 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 16 SO 6/20 | 23.09.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 SO 185/20 | 19.01.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 29. März 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 4 R 1038/19 | 23.06.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 18 R 542/20 | 23.11.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 29. März 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 5 AS 1821/18 | 06.04.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 2 AS 224/21 | 15.06.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 14 AS 277/21 B | 24.01.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 29. März 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 9 AS 1959/10 | 11.11.2016 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 6 AS 304/19 | 29.06.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 AS 1/22 BH | 10.02.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 29. März 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 9 AS 2246/10 | 21.12.2017 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 6 AS 305/19 | 29.06.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 AS 2/22 BH | 10.02.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 29. März 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 30 AY 6/21 | 14.03.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 29. März 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 20 R 338/15 | 21.10.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 BA 62/19 | 24.02.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 29. März 2022 | ||
| Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 BA 62/19 | 24.02.2022 | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 20 R 338/15 | 21.10.2019 | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 29. März 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 22 KR 100/21 | 08.09.2021 | - | - | Sozialgericht Leipzig | 29. März 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 22 KR 100/21 | 08.09.2021 | - | - | Sozialgericht Leipzig | 29. März 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 22 KR 72/20 | 25.11.2020 | - | - | Sozialgericht Leipzig | 29. März 2022 | ||||
| Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KA 3/22 B ER | 17.03.2022 | Sozialgericht Marburg | S 12 KA 305/21 ER | 20.12.2021 | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 28. März 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 2 AS 136/21 | 22.07.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 19 AS 1236/21 | 10.02.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 28. März 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 9 AS 344/12 | 21.12.2017 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 6 AS 19/18 | 29.06.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 AS 79/21 BH | 24.02.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 28. März 2022 |
| Sozialgericht München | S 4 BA 250/21 ER | 29.11.2021 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 BA 1/22 B ER | 28.02.2022 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 28. März 2022 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 246 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 246 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 246 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 6125, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143390 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-03-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-03-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 59 P 445/21 LP [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-59-p-445-21-lp [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:39:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:39:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-59-p-445-21-lp/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130658 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-03-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-03-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 530/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-530-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:06:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:06:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-530-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160655 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-03-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-03-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 1157/21 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-1157-21-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:25:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:25:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-1157-21-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160652 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-03-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-03-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 525/21 ZV [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-525-21-zv [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:25:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:25:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-525-21-zv/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160649 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-03-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-03-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 508/21 ZV [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-508-21-zv [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:25:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:25:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-508-21-zv/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160646 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-03-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-03-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 326/21 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-326-21-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:25:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:25:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-326-21-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160643 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-03-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-03-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 474/21 ZV [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-474-21-zv [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:25:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:25:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-474-21-zv/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160640 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-03-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-03-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 SO 107/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-so-107-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:25:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:25:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-so-107-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156631 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-03-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-03-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 SB 1672/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-sb-1672-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:36:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:36:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-sb-1672-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149653 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-03-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-03-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 16 SO 6/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-16-so-6-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:43:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:43:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-16-so-6-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149649 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-03-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-03-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 SO 185/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-so-185-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:43:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:43:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-so-185-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146841 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-03-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-03-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 R 542/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-r-542-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:18:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:18:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-r-542-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146837 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-03-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-03-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 224/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-224-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:17:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:17:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-224-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146832 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-03-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-03-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 304/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-304-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:17:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:17:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-304-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146828 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-03-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-03-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 305/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-305-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:17:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:17:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-305-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136790 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-03-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-03-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 30 AY 6/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-30-ay-6-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:41:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:41:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-30-ay-6-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136785 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-03-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-03-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 R 338/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-r-338-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:41:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:41:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-r-338-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136780 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-03-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-03-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 BA 62/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ba-62-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:40:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:40:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ba-62-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132280 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-03-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-03-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 22 KR 100/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-22-kr-100-21-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:05:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:05:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-22-kr-100-21-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132279 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-03-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-03-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 22 KR 100/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-22-kr-100-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:05:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:05:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-22-kr-100-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132276 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-03-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-03-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 22 KR 72/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-22-kr-72-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:05:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:05:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-22-kr-72-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149644 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-03-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-03-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KA 3/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ka-3-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:43:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:43:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ka-3-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146823 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-03-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-03-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 AS 1236/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-as-1236-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:17:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:17:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-as-1236-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146818 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-03-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-03-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 19/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-19-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:17:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:17:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-19-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130657 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-03-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-03-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 BA 1/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ba-1-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:06:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:06:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ba-1-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143390 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-03-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-03-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 59 P 445/21 LP [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-59-p-445-21-lp [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:39:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:39:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-59-p-445-21-lp/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 77878f923834c2fa41d1f568de9b0528 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:86ac2f1aee4b37be7252c4655760bf86:0.42167000 1750147992 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.