| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 7 R 533/19 | 19.04.2021 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 13 R 282/21 | 13.09.2021 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 18. März 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 16 AS 558/20 | 06.08.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 499/20 | 09.11.2021 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 18. März 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 11 AS 528/21 ER | 17.01.2022 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 40/22 B ER | 28.02.2022 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 18. März 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gotha | S 19 R 4934/15 | 20.02.2017 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 12 R 304/17 | 20.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 11/20 R | 21.10.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 18. März 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 13 KR 200/18 | 21.02.2022 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 90/22 | 18.07.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 17. März 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Altenburg | S 30 AS 3332/14 | 06.04.2017 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 623/17 | 25.11.2021 | - | Sozialgericht Altenburg | 17. März 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Altenburg | S 23 KR 142/19 | 18.06.2020 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 6 KR 993/20 | 26.08.2021 | - | Sozialgericht Altenburg | 17. März 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gotha | S 38 KR 2865/16 | 19.12.2016 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 2 KR 62/17 | 19.08.2021 | - | Sozialgericht Gotha | 17. März 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 11 AS 761/19 | 01.10.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 589/20 | 28.09.2021 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 17. März 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 13 AS 1451/21 ER | 27.10.2021 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 539/21 B ER | 10.02.2022 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 17. März 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 11 AS 463/19 KO | 10.02.2021 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 131/21 NZB | 17.02.2022 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 17. März 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 10 AS 1330/17 | 18.01.2018 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AS 535/18 | 06.02.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 14 AS 41/20 R | 11.11.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 17. März 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 49 AS 2391/18 | 31.05.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 7 AS 1212/19 | 27.02.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 14 AS 33/20 R | 11.11.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 17. März 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Hildesheim | S 37 AS 1532/17 | 24.09.2018 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 11 AS 1043/18 | 26.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 14 AS 15/20 R | 11.11.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 17. März 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 12 KA 91/21 | 11.03.2022 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KA 46/22 B | 15.09.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 16. März 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 12 KA 231/21 | 11.03.2022 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KA 47/22 B | 15.09.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 16. März 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 15 BL 5/19 | 09.04.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 15 BL 9/20 | 08.02.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 16. März 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 2 AS 2612/19 | 25.10.2021 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 550/21 NZB | 10.02.2022 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 16. März 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 12 AS 4602/16 | 13.08.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 13 AS 3290/18 | 03.08.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 15. März 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 2 SB 575/19 | 10.03.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 SB 1444/21 | 13.01.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 15. März 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 1 SB 3638/19 | 21.12.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 SB 148/21 | 13.01.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 15. März 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 6 SB 573/19 | 04.06.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 SB 2152/20 | 13.01.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 15. März 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 13 AS 401/20 | 19.08.2021 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 402/21 | 11.11.2021 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 15. März 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 3 AS 2368/16 | 15.05.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 12 AS 3063/18 | 14.01.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 11. März 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 16 SB 3707/18 | 26.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 SB 14/21 | 13.01.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 11. März 2022 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 248 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 248 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 248 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 6175, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130656 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-03-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-03-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 R 282/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-r-282-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:06:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:06:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-r-282-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130655 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-03-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-03-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 499/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-499-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:06:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:06:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-499-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130654 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-03-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-03-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 40/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-40-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:06:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:06:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-40-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87750 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-03-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-03-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 5 R 11/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-5-r-11-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:09:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:09:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-5-r-11-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136691 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-03-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-03-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 KR 200/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-kr-200-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:40:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:40:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-kr-200-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132146 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-03-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-03-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 623/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-623-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:04:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:04:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-623-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132142 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-03-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-03-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 KR 993/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-kr-993-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:04:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:04:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-kr-993-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131382 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-03-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-03-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 KR 62/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-kr-62-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:56:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:56:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-kr-62-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130653 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-03-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-03-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 589/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-589-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:06:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:06:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-589-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130652 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-03-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-03-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 539/21 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-539-21-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:06:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:06:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-539-21-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130651 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-03-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-03-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 131/21 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-131-21-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:06:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:06:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-131-21-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87749 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-03-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-03-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 14 AS 41/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-14-as-41-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:09:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:09:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-14-as-41-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87748 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-03-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-03-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 14 AS 33/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-14-as-33-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:09:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:09:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-14-as-33-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87747 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-03-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-03-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 14 AS 15/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-14-as-15-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:09:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:09:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-14-as-15-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149640 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-03-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-03-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 KA 91/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-ka-91-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:43:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:43:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-ka-91-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149635 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-03-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-03-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 KA 231/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-ka-231-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:43:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:43:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-ka-231-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140290 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-03-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-03-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 15 BL 5/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-15-bl-5-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:17:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:17:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-15-bl-5-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130650 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-03-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-03-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 550/21 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-550-21-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:06:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:06:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-550-21-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156597 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-03-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-03-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 AS 3290/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-as-3290-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:36:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:36:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-as-3290-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156593 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-03-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-03-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 SB 1444/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-sb-1444-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:36:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:36:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-sb-1444-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156589 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-03-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-03-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 SB 148/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-sb-148-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:36:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:36:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-sb-148-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156584 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-03-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-03-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 SB 2152/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-sb-2152-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:36:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:36:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-sb-2152-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130649 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-03-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-03-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 402/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-402-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:06:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:06:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-402-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156580 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-03-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-03-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 AS 3063/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-as-3063-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:36:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:36:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-as-3063-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156576 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-03-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-03-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 SB 14/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-sb-14-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:36:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:36:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-sb-14-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130656 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-03-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-03-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 R 282/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-r-282-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:06:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:06:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-r-282-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 18417cf06cf2f177fdc22a4a67838b20 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:e52987f17d86c557f5107ecc7d8803e5:0.93447700 1750281025 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.