| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 14 KR 5594/18 | 12.12.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 236/20 | 25.01.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 23. Februar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 8 AL 2955/18 | 26.08.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 AL 3398/19 | 23.07.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 23. Februar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 14 R 3253/17 | 21.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 R 3883/19 | 15.12.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 23. Februar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 17 R 654/18 | 17.07.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 R 2689/20 | 15.12.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 23. Februar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 14 AS 3158/18 | 18.12.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 AS 288/19 | 17.02.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 23. Februar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 6 KR 1127/19 | 04.06.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 KR 2289/20 | 16.12.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 23. Februar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 17 R 612/19 | 24.09.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 R 3259/20 | 21.12.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 23. Februar 2022 | ||
| - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 13 SB 375/19 | 14.10.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 23. Februar 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 29 AS 6188/15 | 17.03.2021 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AS 336/21 | 09.12.2021 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 22. Februar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 10 AS 3567/15 | 08.10.2019 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AS 1320/19 | 06.01.2022 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 22. Februar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 8 KR 165/15 | 30.08.2016 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 327/16 | 13.08.2021 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 22. Februar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Lübeck | S 9 AR 48/19 KO | 14.01.2020 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 AR 30/20 B KO | 26.01.2022 | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 22. Februar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 74 KR 1768/17 | 24.07.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 10 KR 511/20 | 19.01.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 22. Februar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 11 BK 2/21 | 23.08.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 9 BK 13/21 | 16.12.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7 KG 1/22 B | 29.08.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 22. Februar 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 15 KR 2520/20 | 27.01.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | 21. Februar 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Regensburg | S 10 BL 1/19 | 22.03.2021 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 15 BL 6/21 | 14.12.2021 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 18. Februar 2022 | ||
| - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 P 8/20 KL | 03.02.2022 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 18. Februar 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 18 SO 90/21 ER | 09.11.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 SO 246/21 B ER | 24.01.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Gießen | 17. Februar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 18 SO 90/21 ER | 09.11.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 SO 262/21 B ER | 24.01.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Gießen | 17. Februar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 4 R 144/18 | 26.05.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 R 213/20 | 06.12.2021 | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 16. Februar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 4 R 144/18 | 26.05.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 R 213/20 | 06.12.2021 | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 16. Februar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 10 AS 99/21 ER | 22.11.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AS 551/21 B ER | 04.02.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Kassel | 16. Februar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 10 AS 99/21 ER | 22.11.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AS 551/21 B ER | 04.02.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Kassel | 16. Februar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 18 BA 83/19 | 12.04.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 BA 40/21 | 17.01.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 BA 3/22 B | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 16. Februar 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Nordhausen | S 19 AS 1209/18 | 16.12.2021 | - | - | Sozialgericht Nordhausen | 16. Februar 2022 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 252 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 252 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 252 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 6275, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156478 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 236/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-236-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:35:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:35:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-236-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156474 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 AL 3398/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-al-3398-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:35:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:35:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-al-3398-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156470 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 R 3883/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-r-3883-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:35:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:35:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-r-3883-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156465 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 R 2689/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-r-2689-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:35:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:35:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-r-2689-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156461 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 288/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-288-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:35:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:35:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-288-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156458 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 2289/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-2289-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:35:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:35:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-2289-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156454 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 R 3259/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-r-3259-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:34:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:34:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-r-3259-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146720 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 SB 375/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-sb-375-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:16:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:16:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-sb-375-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160619 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 336/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-336-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:24:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:24:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-336-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160616 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 1320/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-1320-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:24:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:24:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-1320-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160613 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 327/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-327-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:24:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:24:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-327-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150341 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 AR 30/20 B KO [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-ar-30-20-b-ko [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:49:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:49:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-ar-30-20-b-ko/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146715 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 KR 511/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-kr-511-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:16:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:16:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-kr-511-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146710 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 BK 13/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-bk-13-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:16:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:16:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-bk-13-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140065 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 15 KR 2520/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-15-kr-2520-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:14:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:14:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-15-kr-2520-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130644 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 BL 6/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-bl-6-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:06:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:06:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-bl-6-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130643 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 P 8/20 KL [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-p-8-20-kl [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:06:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:06:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-p-8-20-kl/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134934 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 SO 90/21 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-so-90-21-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:26:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:26:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-so-90-21-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134933 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 SO 262/21 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-so-262-21-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:26:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:26:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-so-262-21-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149610 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 4 R 144/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-4-r-144-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:42:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:42:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-4-r-144-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149605 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 R 213/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-r-213-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:42:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:42:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-r-213-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139115 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 AS 99/21 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-as-99-21-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:06:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:06:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-as-99-21-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139110 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 551/21 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-551-21-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:06:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:06:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-551-21-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136761 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 BA 83/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-ba-83-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:40:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:40:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-ba-83-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131879 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 19 AS 1209/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-19-as-1209-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:02:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:02:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-19-as-1209-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156478 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 236/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-236-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:35:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:35:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-236-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 0c84abb5160db6307c52edc9cfecc08d [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:76c544b303e0b425ff883ea1c188cf06:0.93668600 1750328781 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.