| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Nordhausen | S 19 AS 2081/17 | 16.12.2021 | - | - | Sozialgericht Nordhausen | 16. Februar 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Nordhausen | S 18 AL 660/21 | 11.01.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Nordhausen | 16. Februar 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Nordhausen | S 1 U 367/20 | 29.11.2021 | - | - | Sozialgericht Nordhausen | 16. Februar 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Nordhausen | S 13 AS 1056/20 | 30.11.2021 | - | - | Sozialgericht Nordhausen | 16. Februar 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Meiningen | S 3 JVEG 1/21 | 25.01.2021 | - | - | Sozialgericht Meiningen | 16. Februar 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Koblenz | S 1 KR 741/18 | 31.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 5 KR 239/19 | 20.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 16/21 R | 10.11.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 16. Februar 2022 |
| Sozialgericht München | S 7 KR 242/21 | 26.01.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 15. Februar 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 18 BA 83/19 | 12.04.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 BA 40/21 | 17.01.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 BA 3/22 B | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 15. Februar 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 2 RS 1475/14 | 23.02.2015 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 R 507/21 ZV (zuvor: L 4 RS 247/15) | 27.01.2022 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 14. Februar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 11 R 723/19 ZV | 23.03.2021 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 R 260/21 ZV | 27.01.2022 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 14. Februar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 39 R 384/19 ZV | 14.01.2021 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 R 71/21 ZV (zuvor: L 4 R 71/21 ZV) | 27.01.2022 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 14. Februar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 6 R 934/18 ZV | 13.11.2020 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 R 42/21 ZV | 27.01.2022 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 14. Februar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 19 AL 353/18 | 10.12.2020 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AL 2/21 | 11.11.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 4/22 B | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 14. Februar 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 9 AL 145/19 | 08.04.2020 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AL 57/20 | 08.07.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 40/21 R | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 14. Februar 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 42 SO 61/18 | 30.04.2019 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 SO 52/19 | 11.05.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 1/22 R | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 14. Februar 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 9 AL 123/17 | 28.05.2019 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AL 147/19 | 16.09.2021 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 14. Februar 2022 | ||
| - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 SF 477/21 E | 23.12.2021 | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 14. Februar 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Nordhausen | S 1 U 2109/17 | 27.05.2019 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 U 880/19 | 25.11.2021 | - | Sozialgericht Nordhausen | 14. Februar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Meiningen | S 7 R 1960/16 | 03.04.2019 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 SV 952/19 | 25.11.2021 | - | Sozialgericht Meiningen | 14. Februar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 12 R 3582/20 | 30.04.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 R 1944/21 | 19.10.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 12. Februar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 5 AL 528/20 | 31.08.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 AL 3122/20 | 23.07.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 12. Februar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 10 R 2239/14 | 27.04.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 BA 1701/21 B | 26.07.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 12. Februar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 10 R 2239/14 | 27.04.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 BA 1701/21 B | 26.07.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 12. Februar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 8 U 1574/18 | 27.11.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 U 4541/18 | 16.12.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 12. Februar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 4 R 3776/19 | 27.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 R 4116/20 | 16.12.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 12. Februar 2022 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 253 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 253 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 253 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 6300, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131876 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 19 AS 2081/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-19-as-2081-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:02:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:02:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-19-as-2081-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131873 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 AL 660/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-al-660-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:02:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:02:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-al-660-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131869 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 1 U 367/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-1-u-367-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:02:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:02:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-1-u-367-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131864 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 AS 1056/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-as-1056-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:02:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:02:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-as-1056-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131002 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 3 JVEG 1/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-3-jveg-1-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:51:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:51:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-3-jveg-1-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87739 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 16/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-16-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:09:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:09:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-16-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143382 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 7 KR 242/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-7-kr-242-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:39:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:39:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-7-kr-242-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136756 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 BA 40/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ba-40-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:40:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:40:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ba-40-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160610 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 507/21 ZV [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-507-21-zv [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:24:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:24:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-507-21-zv/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160607 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 260/21 ZV [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-260-21-zv [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:24:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:24:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-260-21-zv/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160604 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 71/21 ZV [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-71-21-zv [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:24:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:24:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-71-21-zv/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160601 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 42/21 ZV [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-42-21-zv [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:24:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:24:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-42-21-zv/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160597 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AL 2/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-al-2-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:24:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:24:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-al-2-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160592 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AL 57/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-al-57-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:24:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:24:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-al-57-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160589 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 SO 52/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-so-52-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:24:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:24:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-so-52-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160586 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AL 147/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-al-147-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:24:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:24:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-al-147-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151001 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 SF 477/21 E [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-sf-477-21-e [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 13:01:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 12:01:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-sf-477-21-e/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131860 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 880/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-880-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:02:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:02:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-880-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130999 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 SV 952/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-sv-952-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:51:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:51:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-sv-952-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156450 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 R 1944/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-r-1944-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:34:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:34:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-r-1944-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156446 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 AL 3122/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-al-3122-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:34:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:34:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-al-3122-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156441 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 BA 1701/21 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ba-1701-21-b-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:34:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:34:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ba-1701-21-b-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156438 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 BA 1701/21 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ba-1701-21-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:34:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:34:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ba-1701-21-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156433 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 U 4541/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-u-4541-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:34:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:34:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-u-4541-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156428 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 R 4116/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-r-4116-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:34:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:34:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-r-4116-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131876 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 19 AS 2081/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-19-as-2081-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:02:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:02:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-19-as-2081-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 0658cbc89c95348b3076d3af023ceae5 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:aba02376864f96b5fa281c3fa905b708:0.07930800 1750344429 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.