| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 11 KR 767/19 | 28.01.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Nürnberg | 9. Februar 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht München | S 35 KR 1444/19 | 07.10.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 592/19 | 15.06.2021 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 9. Februar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 10 KA 1229/17 | 04.05.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 KA 3451/18 | 23.11.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 8. Februar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 13 R 2797/19 | 23.01.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 13 R 580/20 | 09.11.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 8. Februar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Lübeck | S 24 BA 18/21 ER | 29.06.2021 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 10 BA 95/21 B ER | 01.10.2021 | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 8. Februar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | S 18 KR 396/16 | 01.03.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 202/18 | 31.01.2019 | - | Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | 8. Februar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 9 R 4573/16 | 29.08.2017 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 R 4329/17 | 19.07.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 23/21 R | 21.10.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 8. Februar 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 6 KR 5611/18 | 03.03.2020 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 1 KR 52/20 | 24.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 36/20 R | 10.11.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 8. Februar 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 15 AS 1510/19 | 28.05.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 AS 1930/20 | 26.05.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 5. Februar 2022 | ||
| - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 SB 3672/20 | 13.09.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 5. Februar 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 8 AL 1054/20 | 09.12.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 AL 220/21 | 23.07.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 5. Februar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 2 SB 4288/18 | 12.05.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 SB 1856/20 | 17.09.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 5. Februar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 12 U 1796/16 | 04.06.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 U 2536/18 | 21.09.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 5. Februar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 4 U 1018/20 | 20.01.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 1 U 577/21 | 27.09.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 5. Februar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 7 U 1383/20 | 18.03.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 U 1150/21 | 16.09.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 5. Februar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 7 U 3448/17 | 25.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 U 314/21 ZVW | 16.09.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 5. Februar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 3 U 2592/14 | 28.10.2016 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 U 4104/20 | 16.09.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 5. Februar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 6 U 1151/20 | 30.07.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 U 207/21 | 16.09.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 5. Februar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 2 KR 3658/19 | 30.07.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 2750/20 | 11.10.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 5. Februar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 16 KR 1972/17 | 14.05.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 2001/20 | 11.10.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 5. Februar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 10 R 2935/18 | 07.09.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 R 3009/20 | 30.11.2021 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 5. Februar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 8 R 4546/18 | 22.11.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 R 4236/19 | 30.11.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 4. Februar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 6 R 1126/17 | 16.01.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 BA 2174/20 | 20.10.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 4. Februar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 10 KA 2497/16 | 24.11.2017 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 KA 897/18 | 23.11.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 4. Februar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 24 KA 143/17 | 14.05.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 KA 2036/19 | 23.11.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 4. Februar 2022 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 258 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 258 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 258 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 6425, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134566 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 KR 767/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-kr-767-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:23:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:23:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-kr-767-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130640 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 592/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-592-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:06:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:06:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-592-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156409 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KA 3451/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-ka-3451-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:34:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:34:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-ka-3451-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156406 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 R 580/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-r-580-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:34:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:34:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-r-580-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150338 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 BA 95/21 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-ba-95-21-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:49:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:49:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-ba-95-21-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134644 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 KR 202/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-kr-202-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:23:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:23:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-kr-202-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87734 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 5 R 23/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-5-r-23-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:09:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:09:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-5-r-23-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87733 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 36/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-36-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:09:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:09:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-36-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156401 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 1930/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-1930-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:34:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:34:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-1930-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156396 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 SB 3672/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-sb-3672-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:34:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:34:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-sb-3672-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156392 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 AL 220/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-al-220-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:34:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:34:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-al-220-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156388 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 SB 1856/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-sb-1856-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:34:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:34:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-sb-1856-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156384 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 U 2536/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-u-2536-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:34:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:34:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-u-2536-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156380 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 577/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-577-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:34:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:34:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-577-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156375 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 U 1150/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-u-1150-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:34:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:34:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-u-1150-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156370 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 U 314/21 ZVW [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-u-314-21-zvw [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:34:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:34:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-u-314-21-zvw/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156365 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 U 4104/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-u-4104-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:33:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:33:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-u-4104-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156361 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 U 207/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-u-207-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:33:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:33:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-u-207-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156357 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 2750/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-2750-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:33:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:33:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-2750-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156353 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 2001/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-2001-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:33:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:33:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-2001-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130639 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 R 3009/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-r-3009-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:06:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:06:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-r-3009-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156346 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 R 4236/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-r-4236-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:33:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:33:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-r-4236-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156342 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 BA 2174/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-ba-2174-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:33:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:33:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-ba-2174-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156338 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KA 897/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-ka-897-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:33:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:33:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-ka-897-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156334 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KA 2036/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-ka-2036-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:33:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:33:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-ka-2036-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134566 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 KR 767/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-kr-767-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:23:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:23:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-kr-767-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => f46f191ec88a957ff4bd7d6af1d79908 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:5ff9fff1ed0bf6f56bddce03efe41bad:0.95712200 1750391610 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.