| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 11 R 2316/18 | 14.04.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 R 1684/20 | 10.12.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 4. Februar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 3 U 2615/15 | 06.12.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 U 109/19 | 16.12.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 4. Februar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 10 AS 1628/19 | 16.12.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 3 AS 3/22 NZB | 26.01.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 4. Februar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 6 R 5589/19 | 18.12.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 R 303/21 | 18.01.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 4. Februar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Koblenz | S 12 KR 2155/19 | 21.10.2020 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 5 KR 198/20 | 04.02.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 9/21 R | 10.11.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 4. Februar 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 14 R 674/16 | 29.03.2017 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 R 1792/17 | 14.12.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 3. Februar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 9 SO 1808/20 | 21.09.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 SO 3290/20 | 20.01.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 3. Februar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 89 KR 1740/20 ER | 27.01.2021 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 4 KR 68/21 B ER | 11.03.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 3. Februar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hildesheim | 2 KR 668/12 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 7 KO 7/18 (KR) | 08.03.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 3. Februar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Oldenburg | S 37 AS 48/21 ER | 08.03.2021 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 13 AS 125/21 B ER | 23.03.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 3. Februar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Lüneburg | S 34 BA 54/18 | 13.05.2020 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 2 BA 29/20 | 10.03.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 3. Februar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 16 AS 1823/19 | 07.10.2020 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 9 AS 695/20 B | 10.03.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 3. Februar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 35 KA 42/20 ER | 11.12.2020 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 3 KA 63/20 B ER | 17.03.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 3. Februar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 41 SB 194/17 | 12.09.2017 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 5 SB 138/17 | 10.02.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 3. Februar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 84 SO 437/16 | 24.07.2017 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 8 SO 286/17 | 26.01.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 3. Februar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stade | S 21 VE 19/11 | 18.01.2016 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 10 VE 11/16 | 28.01.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 3. Februar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Bremen | S 13 AL 135/17 | 22.01.2019 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 11 AL 15/19 | 25.01.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 3. Februar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Oldenburg | S 37 AS 1123/18 | 27.08.2019 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 13 AS 173/19 | 27.01.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 3. Februar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Bremen | S 50 VE 13/12 | 25.10.2017 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 10 VE 79/17 | 17.12.2020 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 3. Februar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Osnabrück | S 22 AS 16/21 ER | 01.02.2021 | - | - | Sozialgericht Osnabrück | 3. Februar 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Lüneburg | S 9 KR 76/18 | 28.01.2021 | - | - | Sozialgericht Lüneburg | 3. Februar 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Lüneburg | S 23 AS 13/21 ER | 10.02.2021 | - | - | Sozialgericht Lüneburg | 3. Februar 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 7 VG 4/14 | 11.05.2017 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 20 VG 10/17 | 17.01.2022 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 3. Februar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 50 SO 825/12 | 31.03.2014 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 15 SO 142/14 | 17.10.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 13/19 R | 02.09.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 3. Februar 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 42 SO 44/12 | 30.01.2015 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 SO 22/15 | 12.03.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 4/20 R | 02.09.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 3. Februar 2022 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 259 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 259 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 259 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 6450, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156329 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 R 1684/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-r-1684-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:33:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:33:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-r-1684-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156324 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 U 109/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-u-109-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:33:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:33:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-u-109-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156319 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 3/22 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-3-22-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:33:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:33:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-3-22-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156315 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 R 303/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-r-303-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:33:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:33:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-r-303-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87732 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 9/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-9-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:09:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:09:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-9-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156312 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 R 1792/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-r-1792-17-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:33:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:33:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-r-1792-17-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156308 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 SO 3290/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-so-3290-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:33:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:33:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-so-3290-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137638 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 68/21 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-68-21-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:57:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:57:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-68-21-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137634 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 KO 7/18 (KR) [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ko-7-18-kr [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:57:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:57:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ko-7-18-kr/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137629 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 AS 125/21 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-as-125-21-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:57:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:57:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-as-125-21-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137626 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 BA 29/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-ba-29-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:57:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:57:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-ba-29-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137617 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AS 695/20 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-as-695-20-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:57:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:57:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-as-695-20-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137614 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 KA 63/20 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-ka-63-20-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:57:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:57:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-ka-63-20-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137612 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 SB 138/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-sb-138-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:57:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:57:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-sb-138-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137609 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 SO 286/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-so-286-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:57:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:57:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-so-286-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137607 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 VE 11/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-ve-11-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:57:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:57:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-ve-11-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137605 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 AL 15/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-al-15-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:57:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:57:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-al-15-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137603 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 AS 173/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-as-173-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:57:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:57:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-as-173-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137601 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 VE 79/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-ve-79-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:57:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:57:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-ve-79-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130994 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 22 AS 16/21 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-22-as-16-21-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:51:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:51:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-22-as-16-21-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130930 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 KR 76/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-kr-76-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:50:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:50:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-kr-76-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130928 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 23 AS 13/21 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-23-as-13-21-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:50:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:50:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-23-as-13-21-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130638 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 20 VG 10/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-20-vg-10-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:06:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:06:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-20-vg-10-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87731 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 8 SO 13/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-8-so-13-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:09:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:09:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-8-so-13-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87730 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 8 SO 4/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-8-so-4-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:09:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:09:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-8-so-4-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156329 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 R 1684/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-r-1684-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:33:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:33:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-r-1684-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 72e069089b2b99fdc36033b721d5039c [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:b98a681cc9ddeadee25ffab7cd5c5de7:0.04300600 1750412458 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.