Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sozialgericht Detmold | S 1 U 18/23 | 18.08.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 15 U 436/23 | 30.04.2024 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 23/24 AR | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 4. September 2024 |
Sozialgericht Aachen | S 10 U 100/19 | 05.08.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 15 U 391/22 | 28.11.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 23/24 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 4. September 2024 |
Sozialgericht Detmold | S 1 U 19/23 | 18.08.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 15 U 437/23 | 30.04.2024 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 24/24 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 4. September 2024 |
Sozialgericht Köln | S 5 AL 47/21 | 27.04.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 9 AL 87/22 | 07.03.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 4. September 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 49 R 1251/19 | 15.11.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 14 R 1046/22 | 26.04.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 4. September 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 52 R 740/22 | 10.10.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 14 R 843/23 | 05.07.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 4. September 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 49 R 1708/18 | 30.11.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 14 R 60/22 | 19.04.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 4. September 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Köln | S 3 AL 726/21 | 04.10.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 20 AL 196/22 | 22.07.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 4. September 2024 | ||
S 17 U 661/23 | 11.04.2024 | L 15 U 180/24 B | 14.08.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 4. September 2024 | ||||
Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 28 KR 3121/19 | 24.08.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 11 KR 844/21 | 26.06.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 4. September 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 32 U 68/23 | 24.01.2024 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 4 U 85/24 B | 22.03.2024 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 11/24 AR | 17.05.2024 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 4. September 2024 |
Sozialgericht Lübeck | S 51 KR 794/15 | 20.05.2020 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 0 KR 172/20 | 09.07.2024 | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 4. September 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Stade | 12 P 26/15 | 20.02.2019 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 12/15 P 18/19 | 24.08.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 4. September 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht München | S 58 AS 1666/21 | 22.08.2023 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 546/23 | 13.05.2024 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 4. September 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 6 R 434/14 | 04.11.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 R 331/19 | 07.02.2024 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 35/24 B | 01.08.2024 | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 3. September 2024 |
Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 6 R 434/14 | 04.11.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 R 331/19 | 07.02.2024 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 35/24 B | 01.08.2024 | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 3. September 2024 |
Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 18 U 12/23 | 14.06.2023 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 17 U 215/23 | - | - | Sozialgericht Nürnberg | 2. September 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 18 KG 5/19 | 11.09.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 14 KG 2/20 | 23.07.2024 | - | Sozialgericht Nürnberg | 2. September 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 70 SO 1726/19 | 14.06.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 30. August 2024 | ||||
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 32 R 330/23 | 25.06.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 30. August 2024 | ||||
Sozialgericht München | S 56 BA 42/23 | 26.10.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 30. August 2024 | ||||
- | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 13 SF 3/23 EK VE | 22.11.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 30. August 2024 | ||||
Sozialgericht Bremen | S 31 R 177/23 ER | 06.10.2023 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 12 R 126/23 B ER | 21.12.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 30. August 2024 | ||
- | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 12 P 19/23 | 25.01.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 30. August 2024 | ||||
Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 30 U 225/19 | 21.06.2022 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 U 128/22 | 22.03.2024 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 52/24 B | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 30. August 2024 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 26 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 26 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 26 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 625, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150849 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 U 436/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-u-436-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:58:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:58:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-u-436-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150847 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 U 391/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-u-391-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:57:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:57:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-u-391-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150845 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 U 437/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-u-437-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:57:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:57:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-u-437-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150843 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AL 87/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-al-87-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:57:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:57:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-al-87-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150841 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 R 1046/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-r-1046-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:57:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:57:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-r-1046-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150839 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 R 843/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-r-843-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:57:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:57:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-r-843-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150837 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 R 60/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-r-60-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:57:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:57:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-r-60-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150835 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 20 AL 196/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-20-al-196-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:57:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:57:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-20-al-196-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150832 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 U 180/24 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-u-180-24-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:57:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:57:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-u-180-24-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150830 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 844/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-844-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:57:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:57:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-844-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150829 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 U 85/24 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-u-85-24-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:57:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:57:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-u-85-24-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150573 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 KR 172/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-kr-172-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:52:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:52:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-kr-172-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139589 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12/15 P 18/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-15-p-18-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:10:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:10:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-15-p-18-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130905 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 546/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-546-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:14:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:14:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-546-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137390 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 R 331/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-r-331-19-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:44:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:44:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-r-331-19-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137389 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 R 331/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-r-331-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:44:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:44:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-r-331-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134908 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 U 12/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-u-12-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:26:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:26:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-u-12-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134906 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 KG 5/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-kg-5-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:26:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:26:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-kg-5-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150377 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 70 SO 1726/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-70-so-1726-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:50:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:50:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-70-so-1726-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150374 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 32 R 330/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-32-r-330-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:50:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:50:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-32-r-330-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144022 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 56 BA 42/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-56-ba-42-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:46:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:46:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-56-ba-42-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139585 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 SF 3/23 EK VE [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-sf-3-23-ek-ve [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:10:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:10:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-sf-3-23-ek-ve/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139581 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 R 126/23 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-r-126-23-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:09:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:09:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-r-126-23-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139578 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 P 19/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-p-19-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:09:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:09:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-p-19-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137240 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 30 U 225/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-30-u-225-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:43:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:43:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-30-u-225-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150849 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 U 436/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-u-436-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:58:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:58:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-u-436-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => bc4a8fcaf4d673324949d07f1247c3f7 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:0e19f4e898c214fb1b3ca758ccc4d36f:0.24318900 1745133666 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.