| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Münster | S 20 P 635/17 | 12.12.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 P 11/19 | 12.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 P 3/20 R | 11.11.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 3. Februar 2022 |
| - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 82/19 KL | 27.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 3/20 R | 12.08.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 3. Februar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 29 KR 1177/14 | 12.10.2016 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KR 585/16 | 22.11.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 29/20 R | 16.08.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 3. Februar 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | S 18 KR 75/14 | 26.10.2016 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 511/16 | 30.04.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 18/20 R | 16.08.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 3. Februar 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Oldenburg | S 37 AS 48/21 ER | 08.03.2021 | - | - | Sozialgericht Oldenburg | 3. Februar 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Oldenburg | S 6 KR 165/16 | 29.01.2021 | - | - | Sozialgericht Oldenburg | 3. Februar 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Aurich | S 55 AS 814/18 | 02.09.2020 | - | - | Sozialgericht Aurich | 3. Februar 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 2 AL 73/19 | 02.09.2021 | - | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 2. Februar 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Lüneburg | S 2 U 49/17 | 13.03.2019 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 3 U 42/19 | 09.12.2020 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 2. Februar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aurich | 2 R 27/19 ER | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 7 SF 7/20 E (R) | 30.10.2020 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 2. Februar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 6 U 1829/18 | 05.12.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 U 180/20 | 14.12.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 1. Februar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 14 R 674/16 | 29.03.2017 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 R 1792/17 | 14.12.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 1. Februar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 18 KA 420/20 | 28.01.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 1. Februar 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 11 KA 465/20 | 28.01.2022 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KA 16/22 | 27.07.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 1. Februar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 18 KA 266/20 | 28.01.2022 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KA 19/22 | 27.07.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 18/22 R | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 1. Februar 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 18 KA 464/20 | 28.01.2022 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KA 20/22 | 27.07.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 19/22 R | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 31. Januar 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 11 SO 1702/17 | 11.01.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 SO 718/19 | 16.06.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 28. Januar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Schleswig | S 6 KR 309/14 | 22.06.2017 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 10 KR 205/17 | 27.07.2021 | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 28. Januar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Kiel | S 2 KA 69/16 | 12.12.2017 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KA 22/18 | 01.06.2021 | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 28. Januar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Kiel | S 16 KA 420/14 | 07.03.2018 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KA 66/18 | 28.09.2021 | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 28. Januar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Schleswig | S 15 AY 55/20 ER | 08.01.2021 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 AY 14/21 B ER | 14.03.2021 | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 28. Januar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Kiel | S 10 KR 222/16 | 13.06.2017 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 10 KR 122/17 | - | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 28. Januar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Lübeck | S 5 KR 110/19 | 13.06.2019 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 110/19 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 13/21 R | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 28. Januar 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 18 KA 303/21 ER | 20.12.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KA 4/22 B ER | - | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 28. Januar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 44 KR 2513/19 | 12.05.2020 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 28. Januar 2022 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 260 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 260 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 260 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 6475, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87729 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 P 3/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-p-3-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:09:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:09:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-p-3-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87728 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 KR 3/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-kr-3-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:09:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:09:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-kr-3-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87727 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 29/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-29-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:09:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:09:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-29-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87726 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 18/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-18-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:09:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:09:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-18-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 71271 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 37 AS 48/21 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-37-as-48-21-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 15:36:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 14:36:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-37-as-48-21-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 71270 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 6 KR 165/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-6-kr-165-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 15:36:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 14:36:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-6-kr-165-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 71265 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 55 AS 814/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-55-as-814-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 15:35:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 14:35:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-55-as-814-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149601 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 2 AL 73/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-2-al-73-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:42:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:42:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-2-al-73-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137600 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 42/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-42-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:57:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:57:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-42-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137599 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 SF 7/20 E (R) [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-sf-7-20-e-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:57:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:57:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-sf-7-20-e-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156304 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 U 180/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-u-180-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:33:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:33:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-u-180-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156299 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 R 1792/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-r-1792-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:33:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:33:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-r-1792-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149596 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 KA 420/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-ka-420-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:42:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:42:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-ka-420-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149591 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 KA 465/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-ka-465-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:42:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:42:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-ka-465-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149586 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 KA 266/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-ka-266-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:42:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:42:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-ka-266-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149581 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-31 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 KA 464/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-ka-464-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:42:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:42:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-ka-464-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156294 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 SO 718/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-so-718-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:33:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:33:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-so-718-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150334 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 KR 205/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-kr-205-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:49:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:49:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-kr-205-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150330 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KA 22/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ka-22-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:49:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:49:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ka-22-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150326 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KA 66/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ka-66-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:49:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:49:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ka-66-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150322 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AY 14/21 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-ay-14-21-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:49:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:49:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-ay-14-21-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150318 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 KR 122/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-kr-122-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:49:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:49:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-kr-122-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150313 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 110/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-110-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:49:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:49:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-110-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149576 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 KA 303/21 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-ka-303-21-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:42:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:42:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-ka-303-21-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143378 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 44 KR 2513/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-44-kr-2513-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:39:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:39:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-44-kr-2513-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87729 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-02-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-02-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 P 3/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-p-3-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:09:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:09:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-p-3-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 141fedaf2bf09f30da9f147f072f915a [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:2fa50e57b3ee4c762b2e0cbe5e34d9e4:0.02304700 1750413054 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.