Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 2 KR 385/21 | 17.12.2021 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 12 KR 19/22 | - | - | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 28. Januar 2022 | ||
Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 6 AS 327/21 ER | 14.06.2021 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 11 AS 310/21 B ER | 23.07.2021 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 28. Januar 2022 | ||
Sozialgericht München | S 44 KR 1813/19 | 07.09.2021 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 477/21 | 07.12.2021 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 28. Januar 2022 | ||
Sozialgericht München | S 18 KR 717/21 ER | 08.07.2021 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 403/21 B ER | 10.01.2022 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 28. Januar 2022 | ||
Sozialgericht München | S 12 KR 2059/20 | 04.05.2021 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 373/21 B | 10.01.2022 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 28. Januar 2022 | ||
Sozialgericht Lübeck | S 3 KR 519/12 | 07.05.2015 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 88/15 | 23.08.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 8/20 R | 27.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 28. Januar 2022 |
Sozialgericht München | S 43 KA 557/16 | 13.04.2018 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 12 KA 22/18 | 26.06.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 27/19 R | 27.01.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 28. Januar 2022 |
Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 41 AS 1754/18 | 21.03.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 7 AS 845/19 | 05.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 14 AS 23/20 R | 26.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 28. Januar 2022 |
Sozialgericht Dresden | S 18 KR 884/14 | 23.06.2015 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 170/16 | 10.04.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 25/19 R | 27.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 28. Januar 2022 |
Sozialgericht Dresden | S 24 KN 2043/13 | 15.06.2016 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KN 550/16 | 24.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 12/21 B | 11.03.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 28. Januar 2022 |
Sozialgericht Koblenz | S 3 KR 742/15 | 10.10.2017 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 5 KR 260/17 | 07.02.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 13/20 R | 17.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 28. Januar 2022 |
Sozialgericht Gotha | S 49 AL 2932/14 | 21.03.2016 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 10 AL 546/16 | 16.05.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 6/19 R | 14.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 28. Januar 2022 |
Sozialgericht Dresden | S 25 KR 793/12 | 24.04.2013 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 KR 108/13 | 13.12.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 34/19 R | 24.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 28. Januar 2022 |
Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 10 KR 320/15 | 08.09.2017 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 631/17 | 29.01.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 9/20 R | 27.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 28. Januar 2022 |
Sozialgericht Hildesheim | S 39 AS 1019/13 | 09.06.2015 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 11 AS 1124/15 | 26.09.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 14 AS 47/18 R | 26.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 28. Januar 2022 |
Sozialgericht Lübeck | S 34 R 388/13 | 24.11.2016 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 R 196/16 | 25.03.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 13 R 13/19 R | 20.01.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 28. Januar 2022 |
Sozialgericht Oldenburg | S 82 R 302/14 | 13.04.2016 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 12 R 116/16 | 26.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 13 R 19/19 R | 21.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 28. Januar 2022 |
Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 7 RS 1837/09 | 16.10.2012 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 RS 510/17 | 18.06.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 RS 3/20 R | 09.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 28. Januar 2022 |
Sozialgericht Altenburg | S 36 AS 3751/13 | 14.10.2016 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 1565/16 | 23.10.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 AS 30/20 R | 08.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 28. Januar 2022 |
- | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 12 SF 48/17 EK | 24.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 ÜG 4/20 B | 17.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 28. Januar 2022 | ||
Sozialgericht Mainz | S 1 R 513/14 | 23.02.2017 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 4 R 177/17 | 17.10.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 13 R 2/20 R | 20.01.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 28. Januar 2022 |
Sozialgericht Kiel | S 16 KA 1083/13 | 20.07.2016 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KA 12/17 | 04.06.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 29/19 R | 25.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 28. Januar 2022 |
Sozialgericht Meiningen | S 5 R 3136/10 | 17.10.2013 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 3 R 837/18 | 15.05.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 RS 1/20 R | 09.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 28. Januar 2022 |
Sozialgericht Itzehoe | S 33 KR 63/13 | 18.03.2016 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 67/16 | 25.04.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 4/19 R | 18.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 28. Januar 2022 |
Sozialgericht Stralsund | S 3 KR 282/15 | 26.01.2018 | Landessozialgericht Mecklenburg-Vorpommern | L 6 KR 18/18 | 23.07.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 5/19 R | 18.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 28. Januar 2022 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 261 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 261 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 261 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 6500, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140288 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 2 KR 385/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-2-kr-385-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:17:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:17:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-2-kr-385-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130637 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 AS 310/21 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-as-310-21-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:06:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:06:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-as-310-21-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130636 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 477/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-477-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:06:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:06:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-477-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130635 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 403/21 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-403-21-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:06:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:06:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-403-21-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130634 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 373/21 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-373-21-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:06:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:06:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-373-21-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87725 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 8/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-8-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:09:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:09:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-8-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87724 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 27/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-27-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:09:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:09:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-27-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87723 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 14 AS 23/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-14-as-23-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:09:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:09:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-14-as-23-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87722 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 25/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-25-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:08:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:08:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-25-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87721 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 5 R 12/21 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-5-r-12-21-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:08:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:08:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-5-r-12-21-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87720 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 13/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-13-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:08:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:08:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-13-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87719 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 11 AL 6/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-11-al-6-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:08:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:08:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-11-al-6-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87718 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 KR 34/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-kr-34-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:08:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:08:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-kr-34-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87717 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 9/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-9-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:08:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:08:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-9-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87716 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 14 AS 47/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-14-as-47-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:08:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:08:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-14-as-47-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87715 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 13 R 13/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-13-r-13-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:08:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:08:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-13-r-13-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87714 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 13 R 19/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-13-r-19-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:08:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:08:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-13-r-19-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87713 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 5 RS 3/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-5-rs-3-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:08:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:08:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-5-rs-3-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87712 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 AS 30/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-as-30-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:08:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:08:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-as-30-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87711 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 10 ÜG 4/20 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-10-ueg-4-20-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:08:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:08:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-10-ueg-4-20-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87710 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 13 R 2/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-13-r-2-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:08:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:08:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-13-r-2-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87709 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 29/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-29-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:08:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:08:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-29-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87708 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 5 RS 1/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-5-rs-1-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:08:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:08:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-5-rs-1-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87707 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 KR 4/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-kr-4-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:08:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:08:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-kr-4-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87706 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 KR 5/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-kr-5-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:08:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:08:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-kr-5-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140288 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 2 KR 385/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-2-kr-385-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:17:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:17:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-2-kr-385-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => b7af68e8caee593e0b28866e5d8de488 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:df2a595d35377a3c688f2ecc76ef2ff2:0.76214800 1750435278 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.