| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 7 R 1346/19 | 13.02.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 R 966/20 | 11.10.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 26. Januar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 28 KR 5303/18 | 17.05.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 1839/20 | 02.11.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 26. Januar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 17 U 3020/17 | 11.12.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 U 495/20 | 16.09.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 26. Januar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 6 EG 2787/19 | 11.02.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 EG 1082/21 | 03.12.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 26. Januar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 6 R 2967/18 | 11.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 R 3921/19 | 01.12.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 26. Januar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Kiel | S 6 AL 10/06 | 08.02.2007 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AL 63/07 | - | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 26. Januar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 9 AS 484/17 | 03.12.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AS 126/20 | 01.12.2021 | - | Sozialgericht Kassel | 26. Januar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 9 AS 40/16 | 03.12.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AS 125/20 | 01.12.2021 | - | Sozialgericht Kassel | 26. Januar 2022 | ||
| Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AS 125/20 | 01.12.2021 | Sozialgericht Kassel | S 9 AS 40/16 | 03.12.2019 | - | Sozialgericht Kassel | 26. Januar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 13 R 645/16 | 15.02.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 BA 25/21 | 18.11.2021 | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 26. Januar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 13 R 645/16 | 15.02.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 BA 25/21 | 18.11.2021 | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 26. Januar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 32 R 13/16 | 07.03.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 267/19 | 19.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 RE 2/20 R | 11.03.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 26. Januar 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 7 U 2733/16 | 13.11.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 U 92/19 | 25.06.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 4/20 R | 15.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 26. Januar 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 34 R 698/15 | 02.11.2018 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 2 R 20/19 | 19.02.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 13 R 5/20 R | 20.01.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 26. Januar 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Braunschweig | S 37 KR 394/18 | 08.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 16 KR 462/19 | 17.03.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 4/20 R | 17.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 26. Januar 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Neubrandenburg | S 3 AS 1438/10 | 25.06.2015 | Landessozialgericht Mecklenburg-Vorpommern | L 10 AS 442/15 | 08.11.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 14 AS 56/19 R | 26.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 26. Januar 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Würzburg | S 14 R 483/16 | 08.11.2016 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 R 5189/16 | 16.07.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 R 18/18 R | 23.02.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 26. Januar 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Speyer | S 9 U 144/16 | 26.10.2018 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 2 U 9/19 | 21.10.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 14/19 R | 15.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 26. Januar 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 71 KA 745/12 | 27.04.2016 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 3 KA 54/16 | 10.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 20/20 B | 17.03.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 26. Januar 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Speyer | S 16 AS 1848/15 | 27.04.2017 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 6 AS 361/17 | 15.08.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 14 AS 35/19 R | 27.01.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 26. Januar 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 11 KR 402/17 | 29.03.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 KR 1556/18 | 28.06.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 32/19 R | 23.02.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 26. Januar 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 87 KA 175/18 | 02.09.2020 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 16/20 R | 04.11.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 26. Januar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 1 U 3910/19 | 16.03.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 U 1240/20 | 16.09.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 25. Januar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 2 U 3361/18 | 15.10.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 U 3951/20 | 16.09.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 25. Januar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 13 AS 1549/20 ER | 02.07.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 AS 2301/20 ER-B | 07.09.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 25. Januar 2022 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 263 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 263 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 263 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 6550, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156290 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 R 966/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-r-966-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:33:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:33:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-r-966-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156286 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 1839/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-1839-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:33:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:33:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-1839-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156282 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 U 495/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-u-495-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:33:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:33:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-u-495-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156278 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 EG 1082/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-eg-1082-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:33:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:33:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-eg-1082-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156274 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 R 3921/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-r-3921-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:32:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:32:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-r-3921-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150304 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AL 63/07 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-al-63-07 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:49:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:49:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-al-63-07/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139105 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 AS 484/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-as-484-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:06:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:06:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-as-484-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139096 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 AS 40/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-as-40-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:06:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:06:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-as-40-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139092 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 125/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-125-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:06:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:06:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-125-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136686 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 R 645/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-r-645-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:40:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:40:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-r-645-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136680 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 BA 25/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-ba-25-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:40:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:40:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-ba-25-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87681 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 5 RE 2/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-5-re-2-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:07:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:07:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-5-re-2-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87680 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 4/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-4-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:07:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:07:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-4-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87679 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 13 R 5/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-13-r-5-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:07:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:07:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-13-r-5-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87678 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 4/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-4-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:07:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:07:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-4-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87677 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 14 AS 56/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-14-as-56-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:07:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:07:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-14-as-56-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87676 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 R 18/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-r-18-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:07:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:07:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-r-18-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87675 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 14/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-14-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:07:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:07:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-14-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87674 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 20/20 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-20-20-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:07:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:07:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-20-20-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87673 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 14 AS 35/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-14-as-35-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:07:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:07:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-14-as-35-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87672 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 KR 32/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-kr-32-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:07:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:07:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-kr-32-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87671 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 16/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-16-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:07:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:07:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-16-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156269 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 U 1240/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-u-1240-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:32:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:32:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-u-1240-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156265 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 U 3951/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-u-3951-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:32:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:32:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-u-3951-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156261 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AS 2301/20 ER-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-as-2301-20-er-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:32:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:32:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-as-2301-20-er-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156290 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 R 966/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-r-966-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:33:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:33:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-r-966-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 4aaeaecb63ba8cc5289e6bc797f12ece [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:0e249e7a00f7b37a51fc16bc104d2ff1:0.40575700 1750451928 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.