| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 6 U 2396/16 | 17.05.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 U 2371/18 | 16.11.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 25. Januar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 22 R 7092/16 | 09.05.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 R 1842/19 | 15.11.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 25. Januar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 3 U 1873/18 | 30.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 12 U 4122/19 | 19.11.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 25. Januar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 3 U 3042/16 | 08.08.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 U 4459/18 | 15.11.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 25. Januar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Lübeck | S 6 R 244/16 | 05.02.2019 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 R 31/19 | 26.08.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 11/22 B | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 25. Januar 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 13 VG 25/19 | 19.04.2021 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 15 VG 10/21 | 02.11.2021 | B 9 V 40/21 B | - | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 25. Januar 2022 | |
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 13 VG 25/19 | 19.04.2021 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 15 VG 10/21 | 02.11.2021 | B 9 V 40/21 B | - | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 25. Januar 2022 | |
| Sozialgericht Bremen | S 22 AS 1393/13 | 04.10.2016 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 15 AS 256/16 | 14.06.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 14 AS 42/19 R | 27.01.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 25. Januar 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 86 KR 384/18 | 19.09.2018 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 16 KR 552/18 | 19.03.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 6/20 R | 17.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 25. Januar 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 71 KR 294/15 | 28.10.2016 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 558/16 | 15.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 28/20 R | 17.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 25. Januar 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 22 R 749/16 | 04.05.2017 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 R 398/17 | 27.02.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 R 15/19 R | 23.02.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 25. Januar 2022 |
| - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 10 SF 2/17 EK | 14.11.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 ÜG 1/19 R | 17.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 25. Januar 2022 | ||
| - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 10 SF 3/17 EK | 14.11.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 ÜG 2/19 R | 17.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 25. Januar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 38 KA 338/17 | 21.03.2018 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 12 KA 21/18 | 16.01.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 32/19 R | 17.03.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 25. Januar 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 89 KR 1476/10 WA | 16.01.2015 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 94/15 | 26.09.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 23/19 R | 24.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 25. Januar 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 12 KA 230/18 | 15.01.2020 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 2/20 R | 17.03.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 24. Januar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 33 KR 417/15 | 25.09.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 462/17 | 26.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 31/20 R | 20.01.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 24. Januar 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 17 AL 2363/17 | 10.10.2017 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 13 AL 4184/17 | 19.03.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 7/19 R | 04.03.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 24. Januar 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 36 U 222/12 | 23.11.2016 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 14 U 27/17 | 17.05.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 7/19 R | 16.03.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 24. Januar 2022 |
| - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 SO 688/17 KL | 19.12.2018 | B 8 SO 6/19 R | 28.01.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 24. Januar 2022 | |||
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 1 KA 10/15 | 18.12.2019 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 3/20 R | 17.03.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 24. Januar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 7 R 366/16 | 26.04.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 R 224/17 | 28.02.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 13 R 7/20 R | 22.03.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 24. Januar 2022 |
| - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 644/18 KL | 18.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 A 1/20 R | 27.01.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 24. Januar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht für das Saarland | S 3 U 181/11 | 19.05.2016 | Landessozialgericht für das Saarland | L 7 U 26/16 | 06.02.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 11/19 R | 16.03.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 24. Januar 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 8 KR 504/15 | 08.08.2016 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 16 KR 676/16 | 28.03.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 15/20 R | 20.01.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 24. Januar 2022 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 265 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 265 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 265 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 6600, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156158 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 U 2371/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-u-2371-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:31:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:31:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-u-2371-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156155 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 R 1842/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-r-1842-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:31:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:31:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-r-1842-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156151 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 U 4122/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-u-4122-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:31:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:31:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-u-4122-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156147 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 U 4459/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-u-4459-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:31:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:31:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-u-4459-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150300 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 31/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-31-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:49:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:49:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-31-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140286 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 VG 25/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-vg-25-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:17:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:17:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-vg-25-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140285 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 VG 25/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-vg-25-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:17:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:17:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-vg-25-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87670 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 14 AS 42/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-14-as-42-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:07:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:07:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-14-as-42-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87669 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 6/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-6-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:07:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:07:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-6-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87668 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 28/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-28-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:07:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:07:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-28-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87667 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 R 15/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-r-15-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:07:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:07:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-r-15-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87666 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 10 ÜG 1/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-10-ueg-1-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:07:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:07:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-10-ueg-1-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87665 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 10 ÜG 2/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-10-ueg-2-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:07:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:07:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-10-ueg-2-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87664 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 32/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-32-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:07:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:07:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-32-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87663 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 KR 23/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-kr-23-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:07:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:07:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-kr-23-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87662 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 2/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-2-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:07:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:07:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-2-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87661 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 31/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-31-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:07:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:07:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-31-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87660 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 11 AL 7/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-11-al-7-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:07:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:07:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-11-al-7-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87659 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 7/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-7-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:07:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:07:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-7-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87658 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 8 SO 6/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-8-so-6-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:07:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:07:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-8-so-6-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87657 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 3/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-3-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:07:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:07:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-3-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87656 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 13 R 7/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-13-r-7-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:07:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:07:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-13-r-7-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87655 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 A 1/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-a-1-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:07:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:07:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-a-1-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87654 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 11/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-11-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:07:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:07:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-11-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87653 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 15/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-15-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:07:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:07:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-15-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156158 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 U 2371/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-u-2371-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:31:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:31:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-u-2371-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => c7496a641534ef822ad4001245563afc [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:38da2747b3d85a1233e53dcf04876ecb:0.63848500 1750474284 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.