Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sozialgericht Köln | S 31 AS 3087/17 | 06.09.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 19 AS 1608/18 | 05.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 14 AS 25/20 R | 27.01.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 24. Januar 2022 |
Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 11 AL 862/19 | 14.08.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 AL 3185/19 | 26.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 5/20 R | 04.03.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 24. Januar 2022 |
Sozialgericht Marburg | S 12 KA 305/19 | 03.06.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KA 21/20 B | 17.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 SF 5/20 R | 05.05.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 24. Januar 2022 |
Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 8 SO 1114/13 | 05.02.2015 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 SO 1419/15 | 08.11.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 9/19 R | 28.01.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 24. Januar 2022 |
Sozialgericht Speyer | S 1 AL 172/16 | 14.02.2018 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 1 AL 20/18 | 12.03.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 3/20 R | 04.03.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 24. Januar 2022 |
Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 6 P 114/18 | 06.12.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 P 2/22 | - | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 21. Januar 2022 | ||
Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 15 R 4080/16 | 06.04.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 R 1633/18 | 25.10.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 13 R 20/19 R | 22.03.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 21. Januar 2022 |
Sozialgericht Schleswig | S 7 U 50/13 | 23.11.2015 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 U 24/16 | 23.01.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 15/19 R | 06.05.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 21. Januar 2022 |
Sozialgericht Lüneburg | S 39 AL 162/15 | 20.06.2017 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 7 AL 121/18 | 14.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 6/20 R | 12.05.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 21. Januar 2022 |
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 70 SO 21/18 | 28.10.2019 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 2/20 R | 23.03.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 21. Januar 2022 | ||
Sozialgericht München | S 28 KA 596/17 | 05.02.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 12 KA 10/19 | 22.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 6/20 R | 17.03.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 21. Januar 2022 |
Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 9 EG 423/18 | 10.10.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 EG 4204/18 | 15.10.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 EG 6/19 R | 18.03.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 21. Januar 2022 |
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 56 KR 2033/19 | 05.03.2020 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 16/20 R | 25.03.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 21. Januar 2022 | ||
Sozialgericht Landshut | S 4 KR 235/19 | 18.06.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 403/19 | 20.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 14/19 R | 26.03.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 21. Januar 2022 |
Sozialgericht Münster | S 10 U 134/14 | 12.01.2017 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 17 U 208/17 | 05.12.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 3/19 R | 16.03.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 21. Januar 2022 |
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 115 U 165/12 | 21.10.2015 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 U 6/19 ZVW | 11.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 12/19 R | 16.03.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 21. Januar 2022 |
Sozialgericht Würzburg | S 6 KR 541/16 | 20.06.2017 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 20 KR 525/17 | 27.11.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 25/20 R | 25.03.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 21. Januar 2022 |
- | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 127/16 KL | 22.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 A 2/20 R | 18.05.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 21. Januar 2022 | ||
Sozialgericht Marburg | S 16 KA 143/16 | 03.04.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KA 11/17 | 12.02.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 7/20 R | 26.05.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 21. Januar 2022 |
Sozialgericht Lüneburg | S 8 EG 3/17 | 21.05.2019 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 2 EG 6/19 | 06.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 EG 3/20 R | 18.03.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 21. Januar 2022 |
Sozialgericht Aurich | S 55 AS 722/15 | 03.12.2019 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 13 AS 18/20 | 08.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 AS 66/20 R | 12.05.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 21. Januar 2022 |
Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 14 AS 4184/18, S 14 AS 4185/18 | 09.05.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 1 AS 2007/19 | 04.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 14 AS 39/20 R | 19.05.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 21. Januar 2022 |
Sozialgericht Hannover | S 48 AS 1478/17 | 05.07.2019 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 7 AS 505/19 | 06.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 AS 88/20 R | 12.05.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 21. Januar 2022 |
Sozialgericht für das Saarland | S 2 KA 8/16 | 29.05.2018 | Landessozialgericht für das Saarland | L 3 KA 2/18 | 24.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 10/20 R | 26.05.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 21. Januar 2022 |
Sozialgericht Landshut | S 6 KR 151/17 | 26.06.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KR 437/19 | 13.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 34/20 R | 18.05.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 21. Januar 2022 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 266 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 266 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 266 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 6625, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87652 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 14 AS 25/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-14-as-25-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:06:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:06:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-14-as-25-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87651 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 11 AL 5/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-11-al-5-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:06:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:06:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-11-al-5-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87650 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 SF 5/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-sf-5-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:06:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:06:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-sf-5-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87649 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 8 SO 9/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-8-so-9-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:06:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:06:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-8-so-9-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87648 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 11 AL 3/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-11-al-3-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:06:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:06:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-11-al-3-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136675 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 6 P 114/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-6-p-114-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:40:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:40:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-6-p-114-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87647 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 13 R 20/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-13-r-20-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:06:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:06:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-13-r-20-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87646 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 15/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-15-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:06:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:06:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-15-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87645 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 11 AL 6/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-11-al-6-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:06:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:06:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-11-al-6-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87644 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 8 SO 2/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-8-so-2-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:06:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:06:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-8-so-2-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87643 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 6/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-6-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:06:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:06:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-6-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87642 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 10 EG 6/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-10-eg-6-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:06:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:06:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-10-eg-6-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87641 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 16/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-16-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:06:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:06:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-16-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87640 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 KR 14/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-kr-14-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:06:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:06:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-kr-14-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87639 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 3/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-3-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:06:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:06:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-3-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87638 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 12/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-12-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:06:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:06:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-12-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87637 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 25/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-25-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:06:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:06:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-25-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87636 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 A 2/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-a-2-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:06:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:06:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-a-2-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87635 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 7/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-7-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:06:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:06:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-7-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87634 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 10 EG 3/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-10-eg-3-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:06:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:06:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-10-eg-3-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87633 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 AS 66/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-as-66-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:06:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:06:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-as-66-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87632 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 14 AS 39/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-14-as-39-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:06:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:06:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-14-as-39-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87631 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 AS 88/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-as-88-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:06:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:06:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-as-88-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87630 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 10/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-10-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:06:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:06:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-10-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87629 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 34/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-34-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:06:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:06:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-34-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87652 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 14 AS 25/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-14-as-25-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:06:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:06:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-14-as-25-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 73fb700d7ffc037159d6b8db8adf6aeb [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:bf1f39118d3742beda70f3837dcf2416:0.44124300 1750473529 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.