| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht München | S 56 R 478/20 | 21.12.2020 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 20. Januar 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht München | S 43 KA 259/15 | 30.03.2017 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 20. Januar 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 11 U 74/20 | 26.11.2021 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 U 167/20 B PKH | 18.01.2022 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 20. Januar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 44 KR 431/18 | 28.04.2021 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 KR 343/21 B | 03.01.2022 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 20. Januar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 36 U 11/16 | 23.08.2018 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 2 U 40/18 | 04.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 17/19 R | 16.03.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 20. Januar 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 22 SO 5373/15 | 08.06.2016 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 SO 2279/16 | 24.01.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 16/19 R | 23.03.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 20. Januar 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 5 KA 3268/16 | 27.06.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 KA 2830/18 | 22.05.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 8/20 R | 26.05.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 20. Januar 2022 |
| Sozialgericht für das Saarland | S 23 KR 491/15 | 07.12.2017 | Landessozialgericht für das Saarland | L 2 KR 2/18 | 23.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 11/20 R | 18.05.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 20. Januar 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 7 AS 633/15 | 26.09.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AS 581/18 | 05.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 AS 76/20 R | 30.06.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 20. Januar 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Bremen | S 37 AS 370/14 | 07.06.2017 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 15 AS 180/17 | 12.03.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 AS 34/20 R | 12.05.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 20. Januar 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Neubrandenburg | S 14 AS 1633/11 | 22.10.2013 | Landessozialgericht Mecklenburg-Vorpommern | L 14 AS 524/13 | 09.01.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 14 AS 57/19 R | 19.05.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 20. Januar 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 35 AS 4609/17 | 25.05.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 7 AS 922/18 | 09.10.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 14 AS 19/20 R | 19.05.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 20. Januar 2022 |
| Sozialgericht München | S 56 R 1478/12 | 03.06.2014 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 14 R 586/14 | 14.09.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 R 21/18 R | 23.02.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 20. Januar 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 39 VE 25/14 | 09.03.2017 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 VE 7/17 | 09.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 V 1/20 R | 10.06.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 20. Januar 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 16 SO 279/18 | 29.07.2019 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 14/19 R | 23.03.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 20. Januar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Neubrandenburg | S 12 AS 1917/10 | 06.05.2014 | Landessozialgericht Mecklenburg-Vorpommern | L 14 AS 655/16 | 04.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 AS 60/20 R | 04.03.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 20. Januar 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Kiel | S 44 KR 308/17 | 17.12.2018 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 13/19 | 26.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 39/20 R | 18.05.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 20. Januar 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 2 KR 446/18 | 25.01.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KR 88/19 | 10.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 37/20 R | 18.05.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 20. Januar 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 14 KR 1/18 | 02.01.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 41/19 | 27.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 32/20 R | 18.05.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 20. Januar 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 11 KA 151/20 | 23.06.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KA 35/20 B | 23.09.2020 | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 19. Januar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 11 KA 148/20 | 23.06.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KA 32/20 B | 24.09.2020 | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 19. Januar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 11 KA 141/20 | 23.06.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KA 36/20 B | 23.09.2020 | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 19. Januar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 12 KA 137/20 | 05.06.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KA 22/20 B | 21.09.2020 | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 19. Januar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 2 AL 47/19 | 04.02.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AL 31/20 | 19.03.2021 | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 19. Januar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 11 KA 294/21 ER | 12.01.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 19. Januar 2022 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 267 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 267 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 267 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 6650, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143375 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 56 R 478/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-56-r-478-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:39:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:39:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-56-r-478-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143371 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 43 KA 259/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-43-ka-259-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:39:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:39:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-43-ka-259-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130633 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 167/20 B PKH [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-167-20-b-pkh [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:06:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:06:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-167-20-b-pkh/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130632 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 KR 343/21 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-kr-343-21-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:06:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:06:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-kr-343-21-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87628 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 17/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-17-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:06:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:06:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-17-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87627 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 8 SO 16/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-8-so-16-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:06:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:06:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-8-so-16-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87626 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 8/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-8-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:06:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:06:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-8-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87625 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 11/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-11-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:06:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:06:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-11-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87624 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 AS 76/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-as-76-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:06:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:06:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-as-76-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87623 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 AS 34/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-as-34-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:06:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:06:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-as-34-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87622 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 14 AS 57/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-14-as-57-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:06:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:06:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-14-as-57-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87621 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 14 AS 19/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-14-as-19-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:06:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:06:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-14-as-19-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87620 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 R 21/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-r-21-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:06:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:06:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-r-21-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87619 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 9 V 1/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-9-v-1-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:06:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:06:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-9-v-1-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87618 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 8 SO 14/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-8-so-14-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:06:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:06:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-8-so-14-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87617 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 AS 60/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-as-60-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:05:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:05:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-as-60-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87616 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 39/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-39-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:05:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:05:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-39-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87615 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 37/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-37-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:05:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:05:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-37-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87614 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 32/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-32-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:05:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:05:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-32-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149571 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 KA 151/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-ka-151-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:42:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:42:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-ka-151-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149566 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 KA 148/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-ka-148-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:42:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:42:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-ka-148-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149562 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 KA 141/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-ka-141-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:42:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:42:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-ka-141-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149556 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 KA 137/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-ka-137-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:42:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:42:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-ka-137-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149551 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 2 AL 47/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-2-al-47-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:42:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:42:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-2-al-47-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149545 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 KA 294/21 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-ka-294-21-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:42:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:42:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-ka-294-21-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143375 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 56 R 478/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-56-r-478-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:39:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:39:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-56-r-478-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => b84b54ccb010291b7f123bc528f7b576 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:5ff66abae8b67342e48ad1d2e5638c65:0.84041600 1750496954 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.