| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 9 SO 96/17 | 25.02.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 SO 59/19 | 20.07.2021 | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 19. Januar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 9 AY 4/18 ER | 21.02.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 AY 7/19 B ER | 31.05.2019 | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 19. Januar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 12 KA 605/14 | 28.10.2015 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KA 44/15 | 15.01.2020 | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 19. Januar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 11 KA 609/05 | 04.07.2007 | - | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 19. Januar 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 11 KA 270/05 | 04.07.2007 | - | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 19. Januar 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 12 KA 19/20 | 09.12.2020 | - | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 19. Januar 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht München | S 28 KA 84/19 | 25.10.2021 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 19. Januar 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 16 U 2291/04 | 07.02.2011 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 81/11 | 12.03.2012 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 181/12 B | 31.07.2012 | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 19. Januar 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | S 29 SO 58/19 ER | 23.05.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 SO 107/19 B ER | 18.06.2019 | - | Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | 19. Januar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | S 18 KR 126/18 | 22.02.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 173/19 | 21.01.2021 | - | Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | 19. Januar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | S 18 KR 134/18 | 11.02.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 158/19 | 10.12.2020 | - | Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | 19. Januar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | S 1 KR 551/17 | 26.09.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 700/18 | 18.06.2020 | - | Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | 19. Januar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | S 21 KR 225/17 ER | 21.08.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 366/17 B ER | 16.10.2017 | - | Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | 19. Januar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | S 1 KR 163/17 ER | 22.05.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 255/19 B ER | 04.10.2017 | - | Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | 19. Januar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | S 5 AL 84/15 | 12.10.2016 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AL 92/16 | 18.05.2018 | - | Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | 19. Januar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 27 AS 976/18 | 15.07.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AS 401/19 | 12.11.2021 | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 18. Januar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | S 21 KR 180/17 | 31.03.2021 | - | - | Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | 18. Januar 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | S 4 R 372/17 | 25.05.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 R 149/20 | 12.07.2021 | - | Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | 18. Januar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | S 18 KR 409/16 | 30.08.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 354/17 | 30.04.2020 | - | Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | 18. Januar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | S 26 SO 63/16 | 07.09.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 SO 166/17 B | 09.10.2017 | - | Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | 18. Januar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | S 18 KR 625/15 | 30.08.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 339/17 | 30.04.2020 | - | Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | 18. Januar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 22 SO 59/19 | 24.11.2021 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 18 SO 1/22 | - | - | Sozialgericht Nürnberg | 18. Januar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 9 R 4573/16 | 29.08.2017 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 R 4329/17 | 19.07.2018 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 17. Januar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 14 R 2959/17 | 04.09.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 R 3578/18 | 25.02.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 17. Januar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 15 R 3774/16 | 06.04.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 R 1632/18 | 28.01.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 17. Januar 2022 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 268 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 268 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 268 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 6675, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149541 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 SO 96/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-so-96-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:42:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:42:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-so-96-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149536 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 AY 4/18 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-ay-4-18-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:42:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:42:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-ay-4-18-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149531 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 KA 605/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-ka-605-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:42:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:42:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-ka-605-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149525 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 KA 609/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-ka-609-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:42:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:42:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-ka-609-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149519 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 KA 270/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-ka-270-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:42:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:42:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-ka-270-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149514 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 KA 19/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-ka-19-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:42:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:42:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-ka-19-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143367 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 28 KA 84/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-28-ka-84-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:38:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:38:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-28-ka-84-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136749 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 16 U 2291/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-16-u-2291-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:40:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:40:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-16-u-2291-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134640 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 29 SO 58/19 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-29-so-58-19-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:23:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:23:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-29-so-58-19-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134636 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 KR 126/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-kr-126-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:23:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:23:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-kr-126-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134632 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 KR 134/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-kr-134-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:23:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:23:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-kr-134-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134627 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 1 KR 551/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-1-kr-551-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:23:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:23:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-1-kr-551-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134622 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 21 KR 225/17 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-21-kr-225-17-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:23:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:23:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-21-kr-225-17-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134618 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 1 KR 163/17 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-1-kr-163-17-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:23:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:23:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-1-kr-163-17-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134613 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 5 AL 84/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-5-al-84-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:23:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:23:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-5-al-84-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136670 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 27 AS 976/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-27-as-976-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:40:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:40:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-27-as-976-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134608 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 21 KR 180/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-21-kr-180-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:23:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:23:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-21-kr-180-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134603 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 4 R 372/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-4-r-372-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:23:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:23:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-4-r-372-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134599 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 KR 409/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-kr-409-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:23:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:23:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-kr-409-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134594 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 26 SO 63/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-26-so-63-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:23:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:23:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-26-so-63-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134590 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 KR 625/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-kr-625-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:23:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:23:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-kr-625-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134559 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 22 SO 59/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-22-so-59-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:23:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:23:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-22-so-59-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156143 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 4329/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-4329-17-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:31:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:31:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-4329-17-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156139 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 3578/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-3578-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:31:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:31:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-3578-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156135 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 1632/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-1632-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:31:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:31:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-1632-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149541 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 SO 96/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-so-96-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:42:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:42:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-so-96-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 649cc4dcbeb087eeed566d5699957a76 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:8ae6a2b675dd43b2f96cc48602b4b0c5:0.38930300 1750496837 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.