| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 30 U 225/19 | 21.06.2022 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 U 128/22 | 22.03.2024 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 52/24 B | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 30. August 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 10 R 69/21 | 20.07.2023 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 22 R 340/24 ER | 22.08.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 30. August 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 20 KR 421/16 | 19.11.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 397/18 | 10.10.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 19/20 R | 17.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 30. August 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 17 SO 101/23 | 31.05.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 12 SO 189/23 | 24.04.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 29. August 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 33 KA 288/14 | 21.06.2017 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 11 KA 49/17 | 01.09.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 15/22 R | 13.12.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 29. August 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 12 KR 1038/20 | 16.01.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 10 KR 1093/21 KH | 15.02.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 29. August 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 36 U 516/18 | 13.09.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 10 U 456/22 | 24.01.2024 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 8/24 R | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 29. August 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 10 KR 381/23 | 24.07.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 29. August 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 10 KR 194/19 | 27.10.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 29. August 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 7 R 154/22 | 17.04.2023 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 30 R 327/23 | 20.03.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 29. August 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 30 SF 4/23 E | 20.01.2023 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 39 SF 73/23 B E | 12.06.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 29. August 2024 | ||
| Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 29 AS 2214/18 KL | 29.02.2024 | - | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 29. August 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 213 AS 3083/18 | 24.11.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 27 AS 1192/22 | 27.06.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 29. August 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 18 KR 531/18 | 04.11.2020 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 539/20 | 14.06.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 20/23 R | 25.06.2024 | Bundessozialgericht | 29. August 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Mainz | S 3 KA 84/20 | 27.07.2022 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 23/22 R | 06.03.2024 | Bundessozialgericht | 29. August 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Kiel | S 28 AS 18/24 ER | 27.03.2024 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AS 46/24 B ER | 22.08.2024 | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 28. August 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 36 U 53/23 | 18.07.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 28. August 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 2 AL 357/23 | 14.05.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht Heilbronn | 28. August 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 2 P 819/24 | 12.06.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht Heilbronn | 28. August 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 2 P 819/24 | 12.06.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht Heilbronn | 28. August 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 2 U 1039/23 | 18.04.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht Heilbronn | 28. August 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Bremen | S 44 AS 164/19 | 23.06.2022 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 13 AS 171/22 | 15.12.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 27. August 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Oldenburg | S 72 U 223/17 | 05.05.2021 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 14 U 96/21 | 11.03.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 27. August 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Oldenburg | S 72 U 223/17 | 05.05.2021 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 14 U 96/21 | 11.03.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 27. August 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 86 KR 770/21 | 06.11.2023 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 16 KR 582/23 | 29.07.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 27. August 2024 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 27 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 27 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 27 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 650, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137235 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 U 128/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-u-128-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:43:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:43:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-u-128-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129663 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 22 R 340/24 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-22-r-340-24-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:52:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:52:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-22-r-340-24-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88139 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 19/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-19-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:21:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:21:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-19-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150827 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 SO 189/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-so-189-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:57:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:57:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-so-189-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150824 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KA 49/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-ka-49-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:57:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:57:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-ka-49-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150822 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 KR 1093/21 KH [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-kr-1093-21-kh [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:57:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:57:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-kr-1093-21-kh/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150820 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 U 456/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-u-456-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:57:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:57:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-u-456-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140382 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 KR 381/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-kr-381-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:18:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:18:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-kr-381-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137229 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 KR 194/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-kr-194-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:43:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:43:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-kr-194-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129660 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 30 R 327/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-30-r-327-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:52:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:52:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-30-r-327-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129657 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 39 SF 73/23 B E [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-39-sf-73-23-b-e [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:52:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:52:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-39-sf-73-23-b-e/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129654 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 29 AS 2214/18 KL [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-29-as-2214-18-kl [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:52:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:52:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-29-as-2214-18-kl/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129649 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 27 AS 1192/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-27-as-1192-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:52:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:52:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-27-as-1192-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88138 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 20/23 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-20-23-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:21:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:21:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-20-23-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88137 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 23/22 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-23-22-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:21:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:21:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-23-22-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150570 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 46/24 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-46-24-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:52:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:52:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-46-24-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143505 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 36 U 53/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-36-u-53-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:40:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:40:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-36-u-53-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131151 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 2 AL 357/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-2-al-357-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:54:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:54:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-2-al-357-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131148 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 2 P 819/24 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-2-p-819-24-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:54:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:54:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-2-p-819-24-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131147 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 2 P 819/24 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-2-p-819-24 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:54:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:54:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-2-p-819-24/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131145 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 2 U 1039/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-2-u-1039-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:54:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:54:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-2-u-1039-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139573 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 AS 171/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-as-171-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:09:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:09:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-as-171-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139569 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 U 96/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-u-96-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:09:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:09:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-u-96-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139568 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 U 96/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-u-96-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:09:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:09:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-u-96-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139564 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 KR 582/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-kr-582-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:09:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:09:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-kr-582-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137235 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 U 128/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-u-128-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:43:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:43:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-u-128-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 025bb049cddd04af2df9bbbd7cf36513 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:2f0ca5941d6e8ee2b67e2253e1dc5602:0.41023400 1745144561 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.