| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 12 KA 268/20 | 17.03.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KA 12/21 | - | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 14. Januar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 12 KA 18/20 | 01.03.2021 | - | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 14. Januar 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 6 R 246/19 | 08.06.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 R 188/20 | 27.04.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 18/21 R | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 14. Januar 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 6 R 117/19 | 09.11.2020 | - | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 14. Januar 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 15 AL 94/19 | 16.06.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AL 66/20 | 11.06.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 42/21 B | 08.09.2021 | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 14. Januar 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 5 AS 966/19 | 29.08.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 479/19 B | 26.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 AS 296/20 B | 20.10.2020 | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 14. Januar 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 5 AS 721/19 ER | 18.06.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 343/19 B ER | 16.10.2019 | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 14. Januar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 16 BL 8/18 | 01.08.2018 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 BL 1/18 | 10.10.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 BL 1/20 R | 10.06.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 14. Januar 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 10 KR 158/08 | 13.06.2013 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 KR 262/13 | 21.02.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 25/19 R | 27.04.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 14. Januar 2022 |
| Sozialgericht München | S 30 R 1848/14 | 14.09.2017 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 R 5188/17 | 06.06.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 R 14/19 R | 27.04.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 14. Januar 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 25 R 602/10 | 22.05.2014 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 1 BA 24/18 | 25.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 R 8/20 R | 27.04.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 14. Januar 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 11 KR 1045/14 | 15.05.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 16 KR 541/18 | 27.06.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 8/20 R | 12.08.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 14. Januar 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Itzehoe | S 4 AS 205/17 | 29.01.2019 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AS 94/19 | 19.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 AS 82/20 R | 05.08.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 14. Januar 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 34 KR 264/15 | 16.01.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 65/18 | 20.12.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 2/19 R | 17.06.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 14. Januar 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 23 U 207/16 | 26.01.2018 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 U 63/18 | 05.02.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 15/20 R | 10.08.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 14. Januar 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 52 R 672/15 | 09.04.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 18 R 351/18 | 27.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 RE 4/20 R | 16.06.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 14. Januar 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 44 AS 1546/17 | 07.08.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 19 AS 1426/19 | 25.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 AS 58/20 R | 05.08.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 14. Januar 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 35 AS 97/18 | 16.07.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 19 AS 1492/18 | 23.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 AS 26/20 R | 05.08.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 14. Januar 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 4 AS 658/16 | 07.02.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AS 292/18 | 05.02.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 14 AS 29/20 R | 21.07.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 14. Januar 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Münster | S 16 KR 548/16 | 11.06.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 544/18 | 30.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 8/21 R | 16.08.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 14. Januar 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Hildesheim | S 42 AY 2/17 | 13.07.2017 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 8 AY 21/17 | 22.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7 AY 5/20 R | 24.06.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 14. Januar 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Schleswig | S 14 VS 14/12 | 02.06.2016 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 VS 48/16 | 29.03.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 V 1/19 R | 30.09.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 14. Januar 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 213 AS 5314/18 | 31.01.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 31 AS 262/19 | 11.04.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 14 AS 99/20 R | 21.07.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 14. Januar 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Trier | S 1 KR 234/17 | 08.11.2018 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 5 KR 311/18 | 04.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 35/19 R | 29.06.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 14. Januar 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Trier | S 1 KR 204/17 | 28.06.2018 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 5 KR 208/18 | 04.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 33/19 R | 29.06.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | 14. Januar 2022 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 272 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 272 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 272 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 6775, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149428 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 KA 268/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-ka-268-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:41:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:41:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-ka-268-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149423 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 KA 18/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-ka-18-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:41:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:41:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-ka-18-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136698 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 6 R 246/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-6-r-246-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:40:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:40:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-6-r-246-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136694 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 6 R 117/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-6-r-117-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:40:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:40:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-6-r-117-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136687 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 15 AL 94/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-15-al-94-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:40:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:40:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-15-al-94-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136683 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 5 AS 966/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-5-as-966-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:40:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:40:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-5-as-966-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136679 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 5 AS 721/19 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-5-as-721-19-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:40:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:40:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-5-as-721-19-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87613 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 9 BL 1/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-9-bl-1-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:05:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:05:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-9-bl-1-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87612 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 KR 25/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-kr-25-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:05:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:05:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-kr-25-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87611 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 R 14/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-r-14-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:05:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:05:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-r-14-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87610 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 R 8/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-r-8-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:05:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:05:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-r-8-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87609 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 KR 8/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-kr-8-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:05:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:05:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-kr-8-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87608 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 AS 82/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-as-82-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:05:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:05:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-as-82-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87607 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 KR 2/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-kr-2-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:05:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:05:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-kr-2-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87606 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 15/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-15-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:05:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:05:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-15-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87605 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 5 RE 4/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-5-re-4-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:05:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:05:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-5-re-4-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87604 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 AS 58/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-as-58-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:05:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:05:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-as-58-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87603 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 AS 26/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-as-26-20-r-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:05:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:05:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-as-26-20-r-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87602 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 14 AS 29/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-14-as-29-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:05:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:05:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-14-as-29-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87601 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 8/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-8-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:05:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:05:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-8-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87600 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 7 AY 5/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-7-ay-5-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:05:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:05:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-7-ay-5-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87599 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 9 V 1/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-9-v-1-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:05:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:05:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-9-v-1-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87598 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 14 AS 99/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-14-as-99-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:05:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:05:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-14-as-99-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87597 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 KR 35/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-kr-35-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:05:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:05:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-kr-35-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87596 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 KR 33/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-kr-33-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:05:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:05:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-kr-33-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149428 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 KA 268/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-ka-268-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:41:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:41:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-ka-268-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 1169af50f15c9289d72af361cac89906 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:eff06afe17e76b1a9c4127144a0f0524:0.94790600 1750535205 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.