Erste InstanzAktenzeichen (1. Instanz)Datum (1. Instanz)Zweite InstanzAktenzeichen (2. Instanz)Datum (2. Instanz)Dritte InstanzAktenzeichen (3. Instanz)Datum (3. Instanz)GerichtErstellt
Sozialgericht GießenS 20 AL 70/2105.11.2021--Sozialgericht Gießen12. Januar 2022
S 7 P 48/2017.08.2021L 6 P 31/2112.11.2021-Sozialgericht Gießen12. Januar 2022
Sozialgericht GießenS 7 P 6/2117.08.2021Hessisches LandessozialgerichtL 6 P 31/2112.11.2021-Sozialgericht Gießen12. Januar 2022
Sozialgericht GießenS 14 AL 81/2112.07.2021--Sozialgericht Gießen12. Januar 2022
Sozialgericht GießenS 12 KG 2/1807.05.2021Hessisches LandessozialgerichtL 5 KG 4/21--Sozialgericht Gießen12. Januar 2022
S 29 AS 86/21 ER19.03.2021L 9 AS 158/21 B ER07.05.2021-Sozialgericht Gießen12. Januar 2022
Sozialgericht GießenS 13 P 50/20 ER25.01.2021Hessisches LandessozialgerichtL 6 P 4/21 B ER05.03.2021-Sozialgericht Gießen12. Januar 2022
Sozialgericht GießenS 6 R 211/20 ER30.09.2020Hessisches LandessozialgerichtL 5 R 282/2012.01.2021-Sozialgericht Gießen12. Januar 2022
Sozialgericht GießenS 5 KR 186/1613.02.2020Hessisches LandessozialgerichtL 1 KR 65/2005.08.2021-Sozialgericht Gießen12. Januar 2022
Sozialgericht GießenS 1 U 15/1706.09.2019Hessisches LandessozialgerichtL 3 U 195/1926.01.2021-Sozialgericht Gießen12. Januar 2022
Sozialgericht GießenS 27 AS 144/1530.01.2019Hessisches LandessozialgerichtL 9 AS 122/1925.06.2021-Sozialgericht Gießen12. Januar 2022
Sozialgericht GießenS 2 R 71/1625.01.2019Hessisches LandessozialgerichtL 5 R 74/1707.05.2021-Sozialgericht Gießen12. Januar 2022
Sozialgericht GießenS 3 U 23/1719.07.2018Hessisches LandessozialgerichtL 3 U 157/1829.03.2021-Sozialgericht Gießen12. Januar 2022
Sozialgericht GießenS 4 R 469/1427.04.2017Hessisches LandessozialgerichtL 1 KR 272/1704.04.2019-Sozialgericht Gießen12. Januar 2022
Sozialgericht GießenS 16 SB 30/1430.03.2017Hessisches LandessozialgerichtL 3 SB 60/1713.02.2019-Sozialgericht Gießen12. Januar 2022
Sozialgericht GießenS 1 U 19/1229.05.2015Hessisches LandessozialgerichtL 3 U 155/1503.08.2021-Sozialgericht Gießen12. Januar 2022
Sozialgericht GießenS 6 R 618/0928.10.2011Hessisches LandessozialgerichtL 5 R 543/1120.03.2014-Sozialgericht Gießen12. Januar 2022
Sozialgericht GießenS 2 R 889/0707.01.2011Hessisches LandessozialgerichtL 5 R 74/1707.05.2021-Sozialgericht Gießen12. Januar 2022
Sozialgericht GießenS 29 AS 1139/08 ER16.09.2008Hessisches LandessozialgerichtL 9 AS 350/08 B ER18.11.2008-Sozialgericht Gießen12. Januar 2022
Sozialgericht FuldaS 4 SF 12/21 K09.08.2021Hessisches LandessozialgerichtL 2 SB 128/21 B15.11.2021-Sozialgericht Fulda12. Januar 2022
Sozialgericht FuldaS 4 SF 12/21 K09.08.2021Hessisches LandessozialgerichtL 2 SB 128/21 B15.11.2021-Sozialgericht Fulda12. Januar 2022
Sozialgericht FuldaS 3 R 26/1409.10.2018Hessisches LandessozialgerichtL 5 R 399/1805.02.2021-Sozialgericht Fulda12. Januar 2022
Sozialgericht FuldaS 8 U 77/1704.12.2017Hessisches LandessozialgerichtL 3 U 12/1829.03.2021-Sozialgericht Fulda12. Januar 2022
Sozialgericht FrankfurtS 14 R 606/1603.12.2020--Sozialgericht Frankfurt11. Januar 2022
Sozialgericht FrankfurtS 27 SO 46/1708.10.2019Hessisches LandessozialgerichtL 4 SO 217/1913.10.2021BundessozialgerichtB 8 SO 65/21 B-Sozialgericht Frankfurt11. Januar 2022
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 275 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 275 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 275 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 6850, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134932 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 AL 70/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-al-70-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:26:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:26:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-al-70-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134931 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 7 P 48/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-7-p-48-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:26:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:26:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-7-p-48-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134930 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 7 P 6/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-7-p-6-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:26:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:26:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-7-p-6-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134929 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 AL 81/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-al-81-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:26:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:26:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-al-81-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134928 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 KG 2/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-kg-2-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:26:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:26:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-kg-2-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134927 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 29 AS 86/21 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-29-as-86-21-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:26:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:26:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-29-as-86-21-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134926 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 P 50/20 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-p-50-20-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:26:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:26:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-p-50-20-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134925 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 6 R 211/20 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-6-r-211-20-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:26:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:26:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-6-r-211-20-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134924 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 5 KR 186/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-5-kr-186-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:26:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:26:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-5-kr-186-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134923 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 1 U 15/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-1-u-15-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:26:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:26:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-1-u-15-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134921 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 27 AS 144/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-27-as-144-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:26:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:26:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-27-as-144-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134919 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 2 R 71/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-2-r-71-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:26:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:26:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-2-r-71-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134917 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 3 U 23/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-3-u-23-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:26:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:26:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-3-u-23-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134915 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 4 R 469/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-4-r-469-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:26:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:26:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-4-r-469-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134913 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 16 SB 30/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-16-sb-30-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:26:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:26:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-16-sb-30-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134909 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 1 U 19/12 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-1-u-19-12 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:26:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:26:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-1-u-19-12/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134907 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 6 R 618/09 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-6-r-618-09 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:26:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:26:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-6-r-618-09/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134905 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 2 R 889/07 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-2-r-889-07 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:26:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:26:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-2-r-889-07/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134904 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 29 AS 1139/08 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-29-as-1139-08-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:26:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:26:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-29-as-1139-08-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134544 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 4 SF 12/21 K [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-4-sf-12-21-k [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:23:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:23:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-4-sf-12-21-k/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134543 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 4 SF 12/21 K [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-4-sf-12-21-k [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:23:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:23:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-4-sf-12-21-k/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134540 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 3 R 26/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-3-r-26-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:22:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:22:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-3-r-26-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134534 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 U 77/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-u-77-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:22:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:22:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-u-77-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136625 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 R 606/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-r-606-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:40:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:40:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-r-606-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136620 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 27 SO 46/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-27-so-46-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:40:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:40:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-27-so-46-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134932 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 AL 70/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-al-70-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:26:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:26:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-al-70-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 524f23b91b7eed9945cbaacd976d7eda [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:288a5d0ab40d42cc572a65bddf84814b:0.30873200 1750574234 [wpftsi_session] => )