| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 3 U 251/16 | 23.10.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 U 189/19 | 30.04.2021 | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 11. Januar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 27 AS 144/15 | 30.01.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 AS 122/19 | 25.06.2021 | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 11. Januar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 4 U 79/16 | 18.01.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 U 67/19 | 10.06.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 117/21 B | 26.07.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 11. Januar 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 23 U 10/18 | 23.11.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 U 87/21 | 22.11.2021 | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 11. Januar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 12 KR 546/17 | 05.11.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 722/18 | 25.02.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 30/21 B | 18.08.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 11. Januar 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 7 P 23/18 | 12.10.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 P 45/18 | 28.03.2019 | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 11. Januar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | S 18 KR 134/18 | 11.02.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 158/19 | 10.12.2020 | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 11. Januar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 28 KR 105/16 | 10.12.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 32/19 | 30.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 15/20 B | 17.05.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 11. Januar 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 18 KR 633/13 | 08.12.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 477/20 | 23.09.2021 | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 11. Januar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Fulda | S 4 KR 77/15 | 14.02.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 222/19 | 24.06.2021 | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 11. Januar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 34 KR 590/16 | 07.07.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 222/20 | 15.07.2021 | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 11. Januar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 20 R 599/17 | 03.11.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 BA 52/20 | 15.07.2021 | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 11. Januar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 20 R 364/16 | 20.10.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 BA 46/20 | 26.08.2021 | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 11. Januar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 5 AS 966/19 | 29.08.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 479/19 | 26.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 AS 296/20 B | 20.10.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 11. Januar 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 11 AL 252/17 | 16.05.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AL 80/19 | 18.09.2020 | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 11. Januar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 11 AL 229/17 | 18.04.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AL 64/19 | 19.02.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 8/21 R | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 11. Januar 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 3 AL 54/19 | 03.06.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AL 59/19 | 13.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 8/20 R | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 11. Januar 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 2 AL 47/19 | 04.02.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AL 31/20 | 19.03.2021 | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 11. Januar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 7 AS 7/15 | 24.05.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AS 316/17 | 15.09.2021 | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 11. Januar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 6 U 3655/16 | 16.08.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 U 3673/18 | 23.09.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 10. Januar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 13 R 552/18 | 08.04.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 R 1631/21 | 20.10.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 10. Januar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 20 R 4074/16 | 19.06.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 BA 2744/18 | 15.06.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 10. Januar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 19 KR 2432/18 | 24.07.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 KR 2522/20 | 25.10.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 10. Januar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 14 R 379/17 | 15.08.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 R 3155/18 | 23.09.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 10. Januar 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 26 SB 3776/19 | 21.12.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 SB 309/21 | 14.10.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 10. Januar 2022 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 277 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 277 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 277 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 6900, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130546 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 U 189/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-u-189-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:04:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:04:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-u-189-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130544 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AS 122/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-as-122-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:04:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:04:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-as-122-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130542 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 U 67/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-u-67-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:04:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:04:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-u-67-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130540 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 U 87/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-u-87-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:04:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:04:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-u-87-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130538 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 KR 722/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-kr-722-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:04:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:04:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-kr-722-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130536 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 P 45/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-p-45-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:03:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:03:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-p-45-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130534 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 KR 158/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-kr-158-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:03:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:03:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-kr-158-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130532 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 KR 32/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-kr-32-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:03:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:03:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-kr-32-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130530 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 KR 477/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-kr-477-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:03:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:03:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-kr-477-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130528 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 KR 222/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-kr-222-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:03:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:03:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-kr-222-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130526 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 KR 222/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-kr-222-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:03:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:03:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-kr-222-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130524 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 BA 52/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ba-52-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:03:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:03:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ba-52-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130522 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 BA 46/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ba-46-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:03:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:03:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ba-46-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130520 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 479/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-479-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:03:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:03:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-479-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130518 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AL 80/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-al-80-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:03:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:03:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-al-80-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130516 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AL 64/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-al-64-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:03:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:03:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-al-64-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130514 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AL 59/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-al-59-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:03:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:03:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-al-59-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130512 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AL 31/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-al-31-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:03:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:03:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-al-31-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130510 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 316/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-316-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:03:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:03:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-316-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156006 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 U 3673/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-u-3673-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:30:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:30:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-u-3673-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156002 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 R 1631/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-r-1631-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:30:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:30:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-r-1631-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 155998 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 BA 2744/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-ba-2744-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:29:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:29:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-ba-2744-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 155994 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 2522/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-2522-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:29:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:29:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-2522-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 155990 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 R 3155/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-r-3155-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:29:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:29:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-r-3155-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 155986 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 SB 309/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-sb-309-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:29:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:29:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-sb-309-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130546 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-01-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-01-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 U 189/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-u-189-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:04:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:04:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-u-189-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 8e8b240a550270c02f4ea9a9ddeb2ab0 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:db96bee633ce358b7871720b647f6af1:0.40119400 1750596798 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.