| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Kiel | S 31 AS 10021/21 ER | 22.04.2021 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AS 66/21 B ER | 12.05.2021 | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 29. Dezember 2021 | ||
| - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 12 SF 75/18 EK | 19.03.2021 | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 29. Dezember 2021 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 9 R 162/19 | 29.03.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 R 115/20 | 16.04.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 163/21 B | - | Sozialgericht Kassel | 29. Dezember 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 1 U 229/04 | 26.08.2005 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 286/05 | 22.04.2008 | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 29. Dezember 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Fulda | S 4 EG 2/16 | 09.02.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 EG 4/17 | 15.01.2019 | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 29. Dezember 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | S 18 KR 126/18 | 22.02.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 173/19 | 21.01.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 24/21 B | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 29. Dezember 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 30 U 197/16 | 24.07.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 U 170/19 | 05.10.2020 | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 29. Dezember 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 6 R 143/15 | 11.12.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 R 421/18 | 15.12.2020 | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 29. Dezember 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 16 AS 53/21 | 16.06.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 AS 2510/21 | 27.09.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 28. Dezember 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 16 AS 375/20 | 16.06.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 AS 2509/21 | 27.09.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 28. Dezember 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 16 AS 376/20 | 16.06.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 AS 2511/21 | 27.09.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 28. Dezember 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 13 KR 1779/19 | 12.02.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 977/20 | 30.11.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 28. Dezember 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 6 KR 5940/18 | 21.09.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 3138/20 | 30.11.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 28. Dezember 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 21 R 4145/19 | 11.09.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 R 3206/20 | 30.11.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 28. Dezember 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 2 SB 621/20 | 04.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 SB 3756/20 | 14.10.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 28. Dezember 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 12 VG 3783/17 | 12.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 VG 4002/20 | 14.10.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 28. Dezember 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Itzehoe | S 27 KR 237/08 | 14.07.2016 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 149/16 | 15.06.2020 | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 28. Dezember 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Kiel | S 35 AS 35/21 ER | 16.03.2021 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AS 43/21 B ER | 29.03.2021 | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 28. Dezember 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Itzehoe | S 27 KR 237/17 | 14.07.2016 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 23/17 | 15.06.2020 | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 28. Dezember 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Itzehoe | S 27 KR 237/08 | 14.07.2016 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 24/17 | 15.06.2020 | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 28. Dezember 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Itzehoe | S 27 KR 237/08 | 14.07.2016 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 23/17 | 15.06.2020 | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 28. Dezember 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Itzehoe | S 27 KR 237/08 | 14.07.2016 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 22/17 | 15.06.2020 | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 28. Dezember 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Itzehoe | S 27 KR 237/08 | 14.07.2016 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 21/17 | 15.06.2020 | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 28. Dezember 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Itzehoe | S 9 U 38/16 | 16.05.2018 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 U 49/18 | 09.03.2021 | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 28. Dezember 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Schleswig | S 10 KR 385/16 | 28.09.2018 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 BA 51/18 | 16.09.2020 | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 28. Dezember 2021 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 288 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 288 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 288 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 7175, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150181 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-12-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-12-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 66/21 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-66-21-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:48:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:48:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-66-21-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150177 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-12-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-12-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 SF 75/18 EK [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-sf-75-18-ek [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:48:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:48:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-sf-75-18-ek/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138920 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-12-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-12-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 R 162/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-r-162-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:05:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:05:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-r-162-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130254 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-12-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-12-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 286/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-286-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:59:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:59:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-286-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130251 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-12-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-12-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 EG 4/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-eg-4-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:59:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:59:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-eg-4-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130249 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-12-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-12-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 KR 173/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-kr-173-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:59:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:59:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-kr-173-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130247 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-12-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-12-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 U 170/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-u-170-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:59:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:59:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-u-170-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130245 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-12-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-12-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 R 421/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-r-421-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:59:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:59:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-r-421-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 155823 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-12-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-12-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 2510/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-2510-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:28:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:28:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-2510-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 155820 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-12-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-12-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 2509/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-2509-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:27:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:27:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-2509-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 155816 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-12-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-12-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 2511/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-2511-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:27:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:27:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-2511-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 155812 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-12-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-12-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 977/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-977-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:27:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:27:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-977-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 155808 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-12-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-12-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 3138/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-3138-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:27:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:27:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-3138-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 155805 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-12-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-12-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 R 3206/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-r-3206-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:27:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:27:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-r-3206-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 155801 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-12-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-12-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 SB 3756/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-sb-3756-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:27:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:27:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-sb-3756-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 155797 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-12-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-12-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 VG 4002/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-vg-4002-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:27:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:27:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-vg-4002-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150173 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-12-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-12-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 149/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-149-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:48:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:48:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-149-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150169 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-12-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-12-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 43/21 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-43-21-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:47:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:47:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-43-21-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150165 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-12-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-12-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 23/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-23-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:47:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:47:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-23-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150160 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-12-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-12-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 24/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-24-17-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:47:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:47:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-24-17-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150155 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-12-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-12-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 24/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-24-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:47:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:47:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-24-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150150 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-12-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-12-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 22/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-22-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:47:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:47:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-22-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150144 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-12-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-12-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 21/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-21-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:47:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:47:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-21-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150139 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-12-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-12-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 U 49/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-u-49-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:47:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:47:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-u-49-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150134 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-12-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-12-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 BA 51/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-ba-51-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:47:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:47:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-ba-51-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150181 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-12-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-12-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 66/21 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-66-21-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:48:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:48:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-66-21-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => f5ed7e300206b7094cfd97c062f4e0df [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:e6e0ff74af9cfa3b57cc8390b971b958:0.35819200 1750706910 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.