| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 15 KR 1999/20 | 20.07.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 10 KR 17/22 | 22.11.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 9/24 R | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 20. August 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 31 R 1975/16 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 4 R 608/23 | 08.05.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 20. August 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Münster | S 7 KR 2399/22 | 31.01.2024 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 10 KR 157/24 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 20. August 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Münster | S 30 SF 51/24 E // S 18 KR 2660/21 KH | 25.07.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht Münster | 20. August 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 31 R 2502/14 | 29.10.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 3 R 1082/21 | 06.11.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 46/23 BH | 15.07.2024 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 19. August 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 39 KR 269/19 | 10.07.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 533/20 | 19.01.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 19. August 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 25 R 960/21 | 12.07.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 4 R 705/22 | 15.12.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 19. August 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 27 SO 462/20 | 22.11.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 9 SO 108/22 | 15.12.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 19. August 2024 | |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 34 R 2188/18 | 27.08.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 21 R 891/21 | 27.10.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 19. August 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 9 KR 776/17 | 30.05.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 450/18 | 14.02.2019 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 19. August 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 9 SO 10/24 | 15.08.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 19. August 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht München | S 40 U 289/22 | 21.06.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 19. August 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 10 KR 2154/22 | 20.02.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht Heilbronn | 19. August 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 17 R 1662/19 | 20.12.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 R 298/23 | 16.07.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 16. August 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 2 R 1156/21 | 18.07.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 R 2345/23 | 10.07.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 16. August 2024 | ||
| - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 SO 2186/22 KL | 19.06.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 16. August 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 2 SO 1006/24 | 11.06.2024 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 SO 2041/24 | 29.07.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 16. August 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 11 SO 1470/24 ER | 15.05.2024 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 SO 1639/24 ER-B | 29.07.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 16. August 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 13 R 1407/21 | 08.05.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 R 1631/23 | 10.07.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 16. August 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 11 AS 21/23 | 07.08.2023 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AS 310/23 | 17.07.2024 | - | Sozialgericht Kassel | 16. August 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Altenburg | S 23 KR 1119/22 | 18.03.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht Altenburg | 16. August 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Altenburg | S 23 KR 1560/21 | 24.06.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht Altenburg | 16. August 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Altenburg | S 4 KR 1729/21 | 25.05.2023 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 2 KR 473/23 | 13.06.2024 | - | Sozialgericht Altenburg | 16. August 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Nordhausen | S 12 SF 220/24 E | 29.07.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht Nordhausen | 16. August 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 24 BA 36/19 | 20.07.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 BA 111/20 | 19.06.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 15. August 2024 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 29 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 29 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 29 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 700, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150799 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 KR 17/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-kr-17-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:57:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:57:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-kr-17-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150798 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 R 608/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-r-608-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:57:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:57:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-r-608-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144013 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 7 KR 2399/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-7-kr-2399-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:45:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:45:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-7-kr-2399-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132875 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 30 SF 51/24 E // S 18 KR 2660/21 KH [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-30-sf-51-24-e-s-18-kr-2660-21-kh [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:09:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:09:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-30-sf-51-24-e-s-18-kr-2660-21-kh/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150796 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 1082/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-1082-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:57:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:57:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-1082-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150794 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 533/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-533-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:56:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:56:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-533-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150792 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 R 705/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-r-705-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:56:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:56:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-r-705-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150790 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 SO 108/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-so-108-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:56:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:56:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-so-108-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150788 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 21 R 891/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-21-r-891-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:56:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:56:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-21-r-891-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150786 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 450/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-450-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:56:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:56:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-450-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150141 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 SO 10/24 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-so-10-24 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:47:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:47:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-so-10-24/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144010 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 40 U 289/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-40-u-289-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:45:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:45:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-40-u-289-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131143 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 KR 2154/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-kr-2154-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:54:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:54:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-kr-2154-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160888 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 R 298/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-r-298-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:28:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:28:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-r-298-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160886 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 R 2345/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-r-2345-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:28:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:28:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-r-2345-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160884 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 SO 2186/22 KL [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-so-2186-22-kl [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:28:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:28:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-so-2186-22-kl/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160880 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 SO 2041/24 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-so-2041-24 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:28:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:28:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-so-2041-24/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160875 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 SO 1639/24 ER-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-so-1639-24-er-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:28:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:28:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-so-1639-24-er-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160873 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 R 1631/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-r-1631-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:28:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:28:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-r-1631-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139504 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 AS 21/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-as-21-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:09:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:09:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-as-21-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132285 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 23 KR 1119/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-23-kr-1119-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:05:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:05:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-23-kr-1119-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132281 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 23 KR 1560/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-23-kr-1560-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:05:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:05:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-23-kr-1560-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132275 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 KR 473/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-kr-473-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:05:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:05:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-kr-473-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132103 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 SF 220/24 E [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-sf-220-24-e [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:04:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:04:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-sf-220-24-e/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150784 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 BA 111/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ba-111-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:56:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:56:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ba-111-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150799 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 KR 17/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-kr-17-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:57:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:57:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-kr-17-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 1794ab08d5f3693f226b60b32fc81552 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:271ef38770d50bf78bcf43ed168767d2:0.73094900 1745144560 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.