| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 9 P 104/19 | 09.07.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 P 50/20 | 19.11.2020 | - | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 9. Dezember 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 8 AS 1448/17 | 29.01.2018 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 15 AS 198/18 | 23.03.2020 | - | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 9. Dezember 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 4 R 1157/19 | 18.02.2021 | - | - | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 9. Dezember 2021 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 3 R 970/10 | 23.10.2012 | - | - | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 9. Dezember 2021 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 2 KR 226/15 | 05.04.2017 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KR 315/17 | 08.10.2020 | - | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 9. Dezember 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 13 SV 11/21 | 25.05.2021 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 SV 21/21 B | 04.08.2021 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 9. Dezember 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 38 KA 5097/20 | 10.11.2021 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 8. Dezember 2021 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Lübeck | S 25 AS 9/21 ER | 12.02.2021 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AS 28/21 B ER | 18.03.2021 | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 7. Dezember 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 17 AY 791/21 ER | 30.04.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 AY 1929/21 ER-B | 13.07.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 6. Dezember 2021 | ||
| - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 707/19 KL | 28.09.2021 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 1. Dezember 2021 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 6 R 486/15 | 31.01.2019 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 3 R 70/19 | 26.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 15. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 31 U 404/14 | 05.07.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 4 U 544/19 | 13.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 226/20 B | 12.01.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 15. Februar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 59 KR 705/17 | 30.01.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 16 KR 216/20 | 22.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 15. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 13 KG 7/18 | 25.06.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 13 KG 4/19 | 09.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 15. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 14 KR 29/21 ER | 12.02.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 15. Februar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 46 SO 29/21 ER | 03.02.2021 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht München | 15. Februar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 9 P 29/17 | 04.05.2018 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 P 38/18 | 30.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 15. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 9 KR 1014/16 | 31.07.2019 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Hamburg | 15. Februar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 26 BK 2/12 | 12.08.2014 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 5 BK 2/14 | 26.09.2016 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Magdeburg | 15. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 6 R 751/12 | 21.01.2015 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 3 R 95/15 | 28.09.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Magdeburg | 15. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 6 R 21/08 | 07.08.2013 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 1 R 379/13 | 15.09.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 336/17 B | 11.01.2018 | Sozialgericht Magdeburg | 15. Februar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 9 R 3410/18 | 04.06.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | 13. Februar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 16 SO 126/15 | 21.03.2019 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 8 SO 23/19 | 03.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 12. Februar 2021 | |
| S 1 SB 2732/16 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 SB 2/19 | 13.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 12. Februar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 5 BA 3693/18 | 30.01.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 BA 889/20 | 13.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 12. Februar 2021 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 298 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 298 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 298 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 7425, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140257 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-12-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-12-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 P 104/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-p-104-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:17:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:17:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-p-104-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140255 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-12-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-12-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 AS 1448/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-as-1448-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:16:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:16:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-as-1448-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140253 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-12-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-12-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 4 R 1157/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-4-r-1157-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:16:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:16:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-4-r-1157-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140251 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-12-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-12-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 3 R 970/10 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-3-r-970-10 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:16:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:16:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-3-r-970-10/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140249 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-12-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-12-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 2 KR 226/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-2-kr-226-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:16:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:16:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-2-kr-226-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130430 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-12-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-12-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 SV 21/21 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-sv-21-21-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:02:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:02:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-sv-21-21-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143354 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-12-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-12-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 38 KA 5097/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-38-ka-5097-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:38:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:38:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-38-ka-5097-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150088 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-12-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-12-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 28/21 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-28-21-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:47:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:47:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-28-21-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 155609 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-12-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-12-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AY 1929/21 ER-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ay-1929-21-er-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:25:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:25:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ay-1929-21-er-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130426 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-12-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-12-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 707/19 KL [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-707-19-kl [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:02:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:02:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-707-19-kl/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161611 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 70/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-70-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:45:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:45:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-70-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146706 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 U 544/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-u-544-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:16:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:16:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-u-544-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146538 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 KR 216/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-kr-216-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:15:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:15:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-kr-216-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145991 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 KG 4/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-kg-4-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:10:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:10:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-kg-4-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144937 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 KR 29/21 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-kr-29-21-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:59:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:59:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-kr-29-21-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143350 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 46 SO 29/21 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-46-so-29-21-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:38:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:38:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-46-so-29-21-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140247 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 P 29/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-p-29-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:16:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:16:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-p-29-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137597 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 KR 1014/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-kr-1014-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:47:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:47:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-kr-1014-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133114 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 26 BK 2/12 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-26-bk-2-12 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:11:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:11:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-26-bk-2-12/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133071 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 6 R 751/12 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-6-r-751-12 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:11:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:11:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-6-r-751-12/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133067 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 6 R 21/08 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-6-r-21-08 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:11:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:11:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-6-r-21-08/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140056 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 R 3410/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-r-3410-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:14:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:14:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-r-3410-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161610 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 SO 23/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-so-23-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:45:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:45:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-so-23-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 155605 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 SB 2/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-sb-2-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:25:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:25:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-sb-2-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 155601 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 BA 889/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ba-889-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:25:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:25:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ba-889-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140257 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-12-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-12-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 P 104/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-p-104-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:17:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:17:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-p-104-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 266d5441a135073279b4547c8764890a [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:15a2650d1ca0c72f62e38ec696c74aef:0.12008600 1750836947 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.