| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 20 SO 203/09 | 24.08.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 SO 193/17 | 13.03.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 2/19 R | 03.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 12. Februar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 8 SO 861/19 | 26.06.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 SO 2656/19 | 04.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 15/19 R | 03.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 12. Februar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 20 SO 80/14 | 13.12.2017 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 18 SO 29/18 | 12.07.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 18/18 R | 27.02.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 12. Februar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 8 R 1413/15 | 13.11.2018 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 3 R 427/18 | 03.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 11. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 1 R 236/18 | 13.11.2019 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 3 R 365/19 | 08.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 11. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 10 RS 6/15 | 25.06.2020 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 3 R 195/20 | 04.02.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 11. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 18 AS 269/20 ER | 28.07.2020 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 4 AS 465/20 B ER | 22.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 11. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 7 AS 386/16 | 23.01.2019 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 4 AS 139/19 | 25.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 11. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 32 AS 1279/15 | 15.09.2017 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 4 AS 324/17 | 12.01.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 11. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 9 KR 1014/16 | 31.07.2019 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 1 KR 106/19 | 21.01.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 11. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 61 R 1054/15 | 01.12.2017 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 3 R 15/18 | 25.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 11. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 10 AL 126/19 | 14.10.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 9 AL 185/20 B | 25.01.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 11. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Münster | S 23 R 266/17 | 12.12.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 3 R 69/19 | 25.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 11. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 41 R 413/18 | 26.11.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 14 R 906/18 | 16.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 13 R 255/19 B | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 11. Februar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 31 AS 4270/14 | 27.08.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 7 AS 1614/18 | 09.10.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 14 AS 114/19 BH | 01.12.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 11. Februar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 13 KR 559/19 | 09.02.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 11. Februar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 6 KR 1786/15 | 19.07.2019 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Hamburg | 11. Februar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 27 KA 81/15 | 27.03.2019 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Hamburg | 11. Februar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 14 KR 687/17 | 16.01.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 31/20 | 11.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 11. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 5 AY 137/20 | 19.10.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 19 AY 117/20 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Nürnberg | 11. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Fulda | S 4 SF 1/12 E | 06.06.2012 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 R 354/12 B | 10.05.2013 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Fulda | 11. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 20 AL 29/17 | 24.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 2 AL 29/19 | 20.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Magdeburg | 11. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 19 SO 33/10 | 09.11.2015 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 8 SO 12/16 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Magdeburg | 11. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 9 P 29/17 | 04.05.2018 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 P 38/18 | 30.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 11. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Fulda | S 4 EG 5/15 | 31.05.2016 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 EG 18/16 | 03.12.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 11. Februar 2021 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 300 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 300 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 300 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 7475, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87483 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 8 SO 2/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-8-so-2-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:02:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:02:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-8-so-2-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87475 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 8 SO 15/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-8-so-15-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:02:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:02:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-8-so-15-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87449 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 8 SO 18/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-8-so-18-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:01:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:01:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-8-so-18-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161609 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 427/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-427-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:45:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:45:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-427-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161608 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 365/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-365-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:45:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:45:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-365-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161607 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 195/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-195-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:45:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:45:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-195-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161598 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 465/20 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-465-20-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:45:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:45:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-465-20-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161597 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 139/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-139-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:45:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:45:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-139-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159427 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 324/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-324-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:07:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:07:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-324-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159423 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 106/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-106-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:07:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:07:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-106-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146692 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 15/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-15-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:16:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:16:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-15-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146687 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AL 185/20 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-al-185-20-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:16:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:16:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-al-185-20-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146682 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 69/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-69-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:16:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:16:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-69-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146677 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 R 906/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-r-906-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:16:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:16:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-r-906-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146672 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 1614/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-1614-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:16:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:16:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-1614-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144935 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 KR 559/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-kr-559-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:59:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:59:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-kr-559-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137596 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 6 KR 1786/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-6-kr-1786-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:47:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:47:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-6-kr-1786-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137595 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 27 KA 81/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-27-ka-81-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:47:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:47:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-27-ka-81-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136237 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 KR 687/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-kr-687-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:37:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:37:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-kr-687-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134535 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 5 AY 137/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-5-ay-137-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:22:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:22:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-5-ay-137-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134028 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 4 SF 1/12 E [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-4-sf-1-12-e [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:19:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:19:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-4-sf-1-12-e/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133421 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 AL 29/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-al-29-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:13:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:13:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-al-29-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133128 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 19 SO 33/10 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-19-so-33-10 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:11:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:11:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-19-so-33-10/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130411 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 P 38/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-p-38-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:02:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:02:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-p-38-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130243 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 EG 18/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-eg-18-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:59:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:59:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-eg-18-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87483 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 8 SO 2/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-8-so-2-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:02:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:02:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-8-so-2-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 53d3414bd29e81cc9c73b9ed3dc23ed0 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:e587adc40c7d54ebb512619b094270c0:0.19719000 1750858864 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.