| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Fulda | S 4 SF 92/12 E | 01.07.2013 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 AS 578/13 B | 04.07.2014 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 11. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Fulda | S 4 SF 1/12 E | 06.06.2012 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 R 354/12 B | 10.05.2013 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 11. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Fulda | S 7 AY 5/11 ER | 05.10.2011 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 AY 10/11 B ER | 13.12.2011 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 11. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 14 KR 687/17 | 16.01.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 31/20 | 11.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 11. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 9 SB 261/13 | 15.06.2015 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 7 SB 83/15 | 18.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 SB 29/20 B | 27.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 10. Februar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 23 U 82/17 | 29.03.2019 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 6 U 23/19 | 13.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 198/20 B | 08.12.2020 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 10. Februar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 25 AS 1377/19 | 07.01.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 10. Februar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 8 AY 74/20 ER | 03.12.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 20 AY 1/21 B ER | 27.01.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 10. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 12 BL 2789/18 | 25.01.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | 10. Februar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 2 AL 4180/19 | 26.01.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | 10. Februar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Speyer | S 21 SO 69/17 | 14.02.2019 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 1 SO 71/19 | 28.01.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | 10. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 17 SO 191/19 ER | 30.03.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 SO 91/20 B ER | 29.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 10. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 32 AL 247/14 | 07.12.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AL 29/18 | 18.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 10. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 32 AS 1687/14 ER | 02.12.2014 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 59/15 B ER | 12.03.2015 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 10. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 32 AS 1815/14 ER | 05.12.2014 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 60/15 B ER | 19.02.2015 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 10. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 32 AS 1687/14 ER | 02.12.2014 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 59/15 B ER | 12.03.2015 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 10. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 32 AL 247/14 | 07.12.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AL 29/18 | 18.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 10. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 17 SO 191/19 ER | 30.03.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 SO 91/20 B ER | 29.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 10. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 40 U 67/15 | 20.11.2018 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 2 U 48/18 | 02.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 9. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 11 KR 470/10 | 17.06.2014 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 16 KR 537/14 | 28.01.2016 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 9. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 21 KR 3491/18 | 15.01.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 11 KR 143/20 | 30.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 9. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 39 KR 2379/20 ER | 07.12.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 11 KR 865/20 B ER | 29.01.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 9. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Münster | S 8 AS 745/15 | 13.09.2017 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 6 AS 2158/17 | 05.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 14 AS 116/19 BH | 25.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 9. Februar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 2 AS 1066/19 ER | 28.04.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 9. Februar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 9 KR 3526/19 | 28.12.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | 9. Februar 2021 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 301 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 301 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 301 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 7500, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130241 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 578/13 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-578-13-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:59:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:59:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-578-13-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130239 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 R 354/12 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-r-354-12-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:59:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:59:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-r-354-12-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130237 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AY 10/11 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ay-10-11-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:59:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:59:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ay-10-11-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130235 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 KR 31/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-kr-31-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:59:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:59:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-kr-31-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161605 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 SB 83/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-sb-83-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:45:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:45:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-sb-83-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161601 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 U 23/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-u-23-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:45:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:45:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-u-23-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144967 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 25 AS 1377/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-25-as-1377-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 03:00:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 02:00:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-25-as-1377-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140276 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 AY 74/20 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-ay-74-20-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:17:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:17:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-ay-74-20-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140050 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 BL 2789/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-bl-2789-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:14:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:14:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-bl-2789-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140047 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 2 AL 4180/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-2-al-4180-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:14:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:14:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-2-al-4180-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137518 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 SO 71/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-so-71-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:46:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:46:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-so-71-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136134 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 17 SO 191/19 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-17-so-191-19-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:37:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:37:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-17-so-191-19-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135755 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 32 AL 247/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-32-al-247-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:34:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:34:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-32-al-247-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135556 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 32 AS 1687/14 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-32-as-1687-14-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:33:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:33:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-32-as-1687-14-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130233 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 60/15 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-60-15-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:59:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:59:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-60-15-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130231 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 59/15 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-59-15-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:59:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:59:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-59-15-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130229 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AL 29/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-al-29-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:59:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:59:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-al-29-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130227 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 SO 91/20 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-so-91-20-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:59:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:59:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-so-91-20-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159419 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 48/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-48-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:07:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:07:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-48-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146667 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 KR 537/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-kr-537-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:16:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:16:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-kr-537-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146662 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 143/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-143-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:16:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:16:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-143-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146657 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 865/20 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-865-20-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:16:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:16:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-865-20-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146652 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 2158/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-2158-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:16:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:16:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-2158-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144933 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 2 AS 1066/19 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-2-as-1066-19-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:59:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:59:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-2-as-1066-19-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140044 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 KR 3526/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-kr-3526-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:14:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:14:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-kr-3526-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130241 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 578/13 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-578-13-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:59:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:59:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-578-13-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 22633ec04fc17f1528748b4eae25267a [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:5fe966093a5ff8a198536d7bae87f606:0.58240400 1750882775 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.