| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 7 AY 66/15 | 22.05.2019 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Hamburg | 9. Februar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 28 KR 203/18 | 17.12.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 37/19 | 30.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 16/20 B | 14.12.2020 | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 9. Februar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 13 AS 1475/13 | 16.08.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 579/19 | 16.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 AS 62/20 R | 02.09.2020 | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 9. Februar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 45 KR 90106/10 | 26.11.2013 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 1 BA 20/18 | 10.04.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Magdeburg | 9. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 14 V 9/07 | 11.11.2010 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 7 VE 1/11 | 23.04.2014 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Magdeburg | 9. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 10 R 118/09 | 28.11.2013 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 1 BA 4/18 | 28.06.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Magdeburg | 9. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 28 KR 203/18 | 17.12.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 37/19 | 30.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 16/20 B | 14.12.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 9. Februar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 13 AS 1475/13 | 16.08.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 579/19 | 16.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 AS 62/20 R | 02.09.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 9. Februar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 27 AY 10/17 | 22.05.2018 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 AY 13/18 | 19.01.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 8. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 3 AY 62/20 ER | 22.10.2020 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 AY 10/20 B ER | 11.01.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 8. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 9 AS 2953/15 | 02.05.2018 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AS 505/18 | 10.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 8. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 36 AL 316/16 | 09.11.2017 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AL 196/17 | 10.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 8. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 26 AL 331/16 | 26.10.2017 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AL 176/17 | 07.01.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 8. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 26 AL 144/18 | 13.11.2018 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AL 5/19 | 07.01.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 8. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 47 KR 717/12 | 10.06.2016 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 KR 202/16 | 13.01.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 8. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 3 KR 346/15 | 06.02.2017 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 384/17 | 23.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 8. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 8 KR 54/17 | 07.05.2018 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 270/18 | 20.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 8. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 18 KR 96/13 | 12.04.2013 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 98/13 | 13.03.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 8. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 15 KR 305/14 | 11.01.2017 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 74/17 B PKH | 22.04.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 8. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 18 KR 351/12 | 30.01.2013 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 50/13 | 13.03.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 8. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 25 KR 160/13 | 14.01.2015 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 42/15 | 10.04.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 8. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 11 KA 88/20 ER | 02.06.2020 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KA 5/20 B ER | 04.01.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 8. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 25 KA 26/20 ER | 25.03.2020 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KA 4/20 B ER | 11.01.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 8. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 25 KA 18/20 ER | 23.01.2020 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KA 2/20 B ER | 20.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 8. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 6 SO 698/18 | 25.04.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 SO 1727/18 | 04.07.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 8. Februar 2021 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 302 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 302 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 302 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 7525, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137594 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 7 AY 66/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-7-ay-66-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:47:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:47:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-7-ay-66-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136501 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 28 KR 203/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-28-kr-203-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:39:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:39:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-28-kr-203-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136494 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 AS 1475/13 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-as-1475-13 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:39:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:39:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-as-1475-13/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133187 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 45 KR 90106/10 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-45-kr-90106-10 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:12:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:12:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-45-kr-90106-10/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133051 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 V 9/07 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-v-9-07 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:11:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:11:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-v-9-07/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132943 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 R 118/09 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-r-118-09 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:10:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:10:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-r-118-09/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130226 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 KR 37/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-kr-37-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:59:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:59:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-kr-37-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130224 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 579/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-579-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:59:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:59:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-579-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160583 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 AY 13/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ay-13-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:24:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:24:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ay-13-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160580 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 AY 10/20 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ay-10-20-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:24:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:24:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ay-10-20-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160577 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 505/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-505-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:24:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:24:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-505-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160574 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AL 196/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-al-196-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:24:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:24:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-al-196-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160571 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AL 176/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-al-176-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:24:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:24:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-al-176-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160568 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AL 5/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-al-5-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:24:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:24:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-al-5-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160565 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 KR 202/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-kr-202-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:24:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:24:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-kr-202-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160562 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 384/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-384-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:24:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:24:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-384-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160559 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 270/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-270-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:23:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:23:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-270-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160555 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 98/13 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-98-13 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:23:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:23:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-98-13/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160552 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 74/17 B PKH [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-74-17-b-pkh [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:23:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:23:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-74-17-b-pkh/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160549 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 50/13 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-50-13-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:23:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:23:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-50-13-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160545 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 42/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-42-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:23:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:23:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-42-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160543 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KA 5/20 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-ka-5-20-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:23:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:23:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-ka-5-20-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160540 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KA 4/20 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-ka-4-20-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:23:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:23:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-ka-4-20-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160537 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KA 2/20 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-ka-2-20-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:23:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:23:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-ka-2-20-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153648 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 SO 1727/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-so-1727-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:04:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:04:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-so-1727-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137594 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 7 AY 66/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-7-ay-66-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:47:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:47:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-7-ay-66-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => c7855de4ccc82681c59af8fafdf5a831 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:35b3bc1e2c0381185022b61de457e160:0.32379900 1750882903 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.