| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Kiel | S 2 KA 259/16 (SG K ) | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KA 26/18 | 24.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 8. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Kiel | S 13 KA 381/15 | 23.05.2018 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KA 53/18 | 10.03.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 8. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Lübeck | S 45 R 566/14 | 29.03.2017 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 R 69/17 | 06.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 8. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Itzehoe | S 30 U 109/14 | 16.01.2017 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 U 11/17 | 01.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 8. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Kiel | S 10 KR 345/13 | 06.12.2016 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 17/17 | 26.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 8. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Itzehoe | S 25 KR 214/12 | 31.03.2017 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 82/17 | 30.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 8. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Münster | S 8 AS 853/16 | 21.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 19 AS 1816/19 | 23.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 8. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 1 U 291/16 | 15.12.2016 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 17 U 91/17 | 17.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 161/20 B | 12.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 8. Februar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 17 U 467/15 | 28.04.2017 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 17 U 436/17 | 27.01.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 8. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Münster | S 3 SB 344/19 | 23.03.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 13 SB 120/20 | 19.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 SB 2/20 BH | 24.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 8. Februar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Münster | S 3 SB 295/19 | 23.03.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 13 SB 119/20 | 19.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 SB 1/20 BH | 24.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 8. Februar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 2 KR 19/18 | 20.02.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KR 108/19 | 21.01.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 8. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 8 AS 7007/14 | 17.05.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 14 AS 1933/17 | 13.01.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 8. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 9 AS 2309/14 | 10.01.2017 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 AS 479/17 | 17.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 5. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 9 AS 3318/14 | 12.01.2017 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 AS 495/17 | 17.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 5. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 20 AS 2921/19 | 22.01.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 AS 785/20 | 20.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 5. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 29 AS 3120/18 | 20.04.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 19 AS 871/20 | 20.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 14 AS 72/20 R | 08.12.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 5. Februar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 29 AS 1975/18 | 17.04.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 19 AS 869/20 | 20.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 14 AS 71/20 R | 08.12.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 5. Februar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 42 KR 1264/16 | 16.05.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 16 KR 458/18 | 22.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 5. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 5 AS 3858/20 ER | 10.12.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 12 AS 1836/20 B ER, L 12 AS 1837/20 B | 25.01.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 5. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 36 AS 1305/16 | 23.02.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 12 AS 536/18 | 12.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 14 AS 102/19 BH | 23.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 5. Februar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 8 AY 74/20 ER | 03.12.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 20 AY 1/21 B ER | 27.01.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 5. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 14 U 164/15 | 16.10.2017 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 17 U 811/20 | 23.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 5. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 1 U 296/18 | 14.05.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 17 U 315/19 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 5. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 17 KR 833/18 ER | 11.12.2018 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 6 KR 5/19 B ER | 26.03.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Magdeburg | 5. Februar 2021 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 303 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 303 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 303 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 7550, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150082 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KA 26/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ka-26-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:47:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:47:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ka-26-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150077 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KA 53/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ka-53-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:47:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:47:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ka-53-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150071 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 R 69/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-r-69-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:47:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:47:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-r-69-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150065 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 U 11/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-u-11-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:47:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:47:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-u-11-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150059 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 17/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-17-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:46:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:46:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-17-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150054 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 82/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-82-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:46:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:46:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-82-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146647 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 AS 1816/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-as-1816-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:16:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:16:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-as-1816-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146643 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 17 U 91/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-17-u-91-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:16:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:16:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-17-u-91-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146638 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 17 U 436/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-17-u-436-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:16:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:16:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-17-u-436-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146633 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 SB 120/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-sb-120-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:16:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:16:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-sb-120-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146627 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 SB 119/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-sb-119-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:16:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:16:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-sb-119-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140245 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 2 KR 19/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-2-kr-19-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:16:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:16:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-2-kr-19-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127171 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 AS 1933/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-as-1933-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:27:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:27:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-as-1933-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 155589 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AS 479/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-as-479-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:25:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:25:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-as-479-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 155586 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AS 495/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-as-495-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:25:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:25:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-as-495-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 155582 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AS 785/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-as-785-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:25:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:25:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-as-785-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146622 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 AS 871/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-as-871-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:16:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:16:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-as-871-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146617 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 AS 869/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-as-869-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:16:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:16:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-as-869-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146612 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 KR 458/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-kr-458-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:16:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:16:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-kr-458-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146607 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 AS 1836/20 B ER, L 12 AS 1837/20 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-as-1836-20-b-er-l-12-as-1837-20-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:15:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:15:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-as-1836-20-b-er-l-12-as-1837-20-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146602 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 AS 536/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-as-536-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:15:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:15:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-as-536-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146573 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 20 AY 1/21 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-20-ay-1-21-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:15:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:15:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-20-ay-1-21-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140273 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 U 164/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-u-164-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:17:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:17:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-u-164-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140271 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 1 U 296/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-1-u-296-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:17:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:17:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-1-u-296-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133417 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 17 KR 833/18 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-17-kr-833-18-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:13:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:13:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-17-kr-833-18-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150082 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KA 26/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ka-26-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:47:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:47:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ka-26-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => e6522aaa227f174c5fa51e5602616e6d [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:59fc4acce38d571924309c3618270db0:0.59898400 1750909533 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.