| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht München | S 42 AS 1614/20 ER | 17.11.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 700/20 B ER | 29.01.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 5. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Regensburg | S 10 R 210/18 | 08.06.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 13 R 321/20 | 29.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 5. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Regensburg | S 10 R 197/19 | 16.12.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 13 R 88/20 | 29.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 5. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 2 KR 19/18 | 20.02.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KR 108/19 | 26.01.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 5. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 45 AS 2070/16 | 13.03.2018 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 16 AS 327/18 | 07.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 5. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 13 AS 1724/20 ER | 02.11.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 16 AS 654/20 B ER | 18.01.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 5. Februar 2021 | |
| S 12 AS 1699/20 ER | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 2 AS 24/21 B ER | 27.01.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 4. Februar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 8 AS 2788/10 | 16.09.2010 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 4 AS 174/18 ZVW | 26.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 4. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 20 R 1238/15 | 21.02.2019 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 2 R 30/19 | 13.01.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 4. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 1 U 6099/16 | 20.07.2017 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 U 3290/17 | 15.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 4. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 9 R 3410/18 | 04.06.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 R 2160/19 | 15.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 4. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 4 R 1485/17 | 24.10.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 R 4190/18 | 17.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 4. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 2 R 2112/16 | 16.10.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 R 4318/18 | 17.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 4. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 3 U 1035/14 | 09.07.2015 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 U 3225/15 | 17.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 4. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 8 AS 1755/17 | 08.12.2017 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 AS 98/18 | 20.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 4. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 8 R 1129/20 ER | 19.05.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 R 1686/20 ER-B | 18.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 4. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 10 R 106/18 | 01.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 R 3817/19 | 17.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 4. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 5/27 KA 2031/04 | 30.05.2007 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KA 55/07 | 15.12.2010 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 4. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 19 AS 1009/16 | 29.01.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 4. Februar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 22 AS 1385/19 | 29.01.2021 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Nürnberg | 4. Februar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 22 AS 1385/19 | 29.01.2021 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Nürnberg | 4. Februar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 25 KR 105/14 | 19.12.2017 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 6 KR 10/18 | 21.02.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Magdeburg | 4. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 6 R 271/16 | 20.09.2017 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 3 R 378/17 | 17.01.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Magdeburg | 4. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 13 AS 3238/12 | 30.11.2016 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 5 AS 295/18 | 18.10.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Magdeburg | 4. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 13 AS 3238/12 | 30.11.2016 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 5 AS 295/18 | 18.10.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Magdeburg | 4. Februar 2021 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 304 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 304 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 304 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 7575, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130408 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 700/20 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-700-20-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:02:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:02:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-700-20-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130404 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 R 321/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-r-321-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:02:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:02:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-r-321-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130402 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 R 88/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-r-88-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:02:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:02:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-r-88-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130400 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 108/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-108-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:02:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:02:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-108-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130398 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 AS 327/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-as-327-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:02:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:02:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-as-327-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130396 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 AS 654/20 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-as-654-20-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:01:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:01:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-as-654-20-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161604 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 24/21 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-24-21-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:45:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:45:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-24-21-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161603 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 174/18 ZVW [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-174-18-zvw [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:45:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:45:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-174-18-zvw/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159414 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 R 30/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-r-30-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:07:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:07:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-r-30-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 155578 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 U 3290/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-u-3290-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:25:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:25:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-u-3290-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 155574 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 R 2160/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-r-2160-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:25:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:25:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-r-2160-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 155570 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 R 4190/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-r-4190-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:25:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:25:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-r-4190-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 155567 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 R 4318/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-r-4318-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:25:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:25:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-r-4318-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 155563 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 U 3225/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-u-3225-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:25:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:25:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-u-3225-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 155559 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AS 98/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-as-98-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:25:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:25:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-as-98-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 155555 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 R 1686/20 ER-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-r-1686-20-er-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:25:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:25:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-r-1686-20-er-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 155552 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 3817/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-3817-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:25:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:25:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-3817-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136489 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 5/27 KA 2031/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-5-27-ka-2031-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:39:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:39:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-5-27-ka-2031-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136398 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 19 AS 1009/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-19-as-1009-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:38:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:38:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-19-as-1009-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134527 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 22 AS 1385/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-22-as-1385-19-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:22:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:22:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-22-as-1385-19-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134526 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 22 AS 1385/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-22-as-1385-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:22:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:22:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-22-as-1385-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133413 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 25 KR 105/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-25-kr-105-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:13:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:13:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-25-kr-105-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133409 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 6 R 271/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-6-r-271-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:13:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:13:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-6-r-271-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133406 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 AS 3238/12 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-as-3238-12-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:13:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:13:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-as-3238-12-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133405 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 AS 3238/12 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-as-3238-12 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:13:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:13:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-as-3238-12/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130408 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 700/20 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-700-20-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:02:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:02:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-700-20-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 8fad36413f531c0f923789e51f31f53f [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:1ae1c8b9b7fe8d9b2bfd233e73f6b08c:0.98505800 1750909015 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.