| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 3 U 1220/14 | 22.12.2016 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 U 1326/17 | 28.01.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 2. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 12 AS 3725/19 ER | 17.12.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 AS 254/20 ER-B | 19.03.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 2. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Meiningen | S 24 SB 991/20 | 28.08.2020 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 SV 969/20 B | 08.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 2. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Gotha | S 10 U 216/16 | 08.11.2018 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 U 138/19 | 10.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 2. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Meiningen | S 9 U 667/17 | 08.04.2019 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 U 627/19 | 10.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 2. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 28 VG 6/09 | 10.03.2015 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 13 VG 64/15 | 18.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 V 1/21 R | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 2. Februar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 28 VG 68/10 | 10.03.2015 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 13 VG 65/15 | 18.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 V 2/21 R | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 2. Februar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 1 U 475/15 | 17.01.2017 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 15 U 164/17 | 08.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 197/20 B | 12.01.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 2. Februar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 15 AL 569/18 | 26.03.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 20 AL 53/19 | 23.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 2/21 R | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 2. Februar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 50 AS 1368/18 | 06.11.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 7 AS 2052/18 | 29.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 2. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 28 R 679/16 | 22.03.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 BA 78/18 | 22.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 R 37/20 B | 15.01.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 2. Februar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 1 KR 148/17 | 30.05.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 2. Februar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 17 U 360/09 | 22.12.2012 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 2. Februar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 31 AS 4133/20 ER | 28.10.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 2. Februar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 58 KG 7/19 | 29.07.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 2. Februar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 83 KR 5351/19 | 15.10.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 2. Februar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 14 KR 16/12 | 27.01.2014 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 16/16 ZVW | 17.05.2016 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 2. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 17 SO 85/20 | 10.02.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 SO 157/20 | 12.01.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 2. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 32 AS 1355/17 | 11.09.2020 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 4 AS 595/20 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | 2. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 32 AS 674/17 | 11.09.2020 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 4 AS 609/20 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | 2. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 1 R 544/13 | 23.02.2018 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | 2. Februar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 17 SO 85/20 | 10.07.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 SO 157/20 | 12.01.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 2. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 116 AS 11041/12 | 22.01.2015 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 34 AS 724/15 | 15.03.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 14 AS 37/19 R | 03.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 2. Februar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 6 AS 840/18 ER | 30.04.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 12 AS 1968/18 ER-B | 14.08.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 2. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 14 AS 1379/17 ER | 25.04.2017 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 AS 2050/17 ER-B | 05.07.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 2. Februar 2021 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 306 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 306 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 306 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 7625, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 155544 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 U 1326/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-u-1326-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:24:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:24:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-u-1326-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154286 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 254/20 ER-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-254-20-er-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:11:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:11:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-254-20-er-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150997 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 SV 969/20 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-sv-969-20-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 13:00:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 12:00:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-sv-969-20-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150995 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 138/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-138-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 13:00:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 12:00:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-138-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150993 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 627/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-627-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 13:00:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 12:00:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-627-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146592 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 VG 64/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-vg-64-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:15:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:15:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-vg-64-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146587 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 VG 65/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-vg-65-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:15:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:15:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-vg-65-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146583 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 U 164/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-u-164-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:15:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:15:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-u-164-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146456 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 20 AL 53/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-20-al-53-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:14:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:14:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-20-al-53-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146326 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 2052/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-2052-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:13:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:13:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-2052-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146141 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 BA 78/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ba-78-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:11:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:11:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ba-78-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144931 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 1 KR 148/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-1-kr-148-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:59:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:59:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-1-kr-148-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137552 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 17 U 360/09 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-17-u-360-09 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:46:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:46:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-17-u-360-09/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137550 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 31 AS 4133/20 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-31-as-4133-20-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:46:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:46:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-31-as-4133-20-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137547 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 58 KG 7/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-58-kg-7-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:46:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:46:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-58-kg-7-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137544 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 83 KR 5351/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-83-kr-5351-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:46:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:46:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-83-kr-5351-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136484 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 KR 16/12 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-kr-16-12 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:39:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:39:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-kr-16-12/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136394 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 17 SO 85/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-17-so-85-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:38:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:38:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-17-so-85-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131847 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 32 AS 1355/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-32-as-1355-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:02:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:02:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-32-as-1355-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131843 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 32 AS 674/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-32-as-674-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:02:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:02:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-32-as-674-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131839 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 1 R 544/13 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-1-r-544-13 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:02:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:02:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-1-r-544-13/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130219 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 SO 157/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-so-157-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:59:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:59:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-so-157-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87551 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 14 AS 37/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-14-as-37-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:04:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:04:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-14-as-37-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81169 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 AS 1968/18 ER-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-as-1968-18-er-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 21:25:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 20:25:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-as-1968-18-er-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 80114 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AS 2050/17 ER-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-as-2050-17-er-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 20:48:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 19:48:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-as-2050-17-er-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 155544 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 U 1326/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-u-1326-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:24:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:24:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-u-1326-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => abfc93e5171852471e23c790dace663e [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:b29f9bd6c157b2b30ecc6fb62f767039:0.05695000 1750939223 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.