| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 44 AL 298/17 | 21.12.2018 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 2 AL 2/19 | 11.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 1. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 11 R 464/17 | 05.03.2020 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 3 BA 11/20 | 27.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 1. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 59 KR 1429/16 | 14.04.2020 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 1 KR 54/20 | 26.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 1. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Nordhausen | S 12 SF 105/19 E | 14.07.2020 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 SF 740/20 B | 06.01.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 1. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Nordhausen | S 12 SF 101/19 E | 14.07.2020 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 SF 737/20 B | 04.01.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 1. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Gotha | S 41 KR 1853/17 | 29.10.2018 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 6 KR 1479/18 | 10.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 1. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Meiningen | S 9 U 282/19 | 27.01.2020 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 U 155/20 | 10.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 1. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 46 KR 797/18 | 25.07.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 10 KR 665/19 | 10.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 74/20 B | 01.12.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 1. Februar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 39 R 1244/13 | 11.03.2015 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 4 R 674/15 | 05.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 216/20 B | 15.12.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 1. Februar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 1 KR 1/17 | 28.11.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 1. Februar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 13 KR 533/18 | 14.05.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 16 KR 479/19 | 16.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 1. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 11 R 311/15 | 19.04.2018 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 14 R 295/18 | 07.02.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 R 10/19 R | 23.09.2020 | Sozialgericht München | 1. Februar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht München | S 22 SF 436/20 AB | 09.11.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht München | 1. Februar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 15 KR 4484/18 | 19.11.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht München | 1. Februar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 18 P 206/20 ER | 23.12.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 1. Februar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 7 SO 113/18 ER | 30.04.2018 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Hamburg | 1. Februar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 21 AS 700/20 ER | 02.11.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AS 554/20 B ER | 15.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 1. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 19 AS 1233/10 | 08.09.2016 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AS 769/16 | 18.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 1. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 20 SO 144/17 | 14.12.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 1. Februar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 10 KR 621/02 | 17.11.2004 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 18/05 | 25.01.2007 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 16/07 R | 28.02.2008 | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 1. Februar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 8 KR 938/19 | 25.05.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 250/20 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 1. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 22 AL 207/20 | 29.01.2021 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Nürnberg | 1. Februar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 39 R 792/18 | 14.01.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | 1. Februar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Münster | S 15 KR 52/20 ER | 17.02.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 11 KR 181/20 B ER | 03.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Münster | 1. Februar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 15 KR 67/18 | 25.09.2020 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | 1. Februar 2021 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 307 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 307 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 307 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 7650, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159394 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AL 2/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-al-2-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:07:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:07:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-al-2-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159390 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 BA 11/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-ba-11-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:07:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:07:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-ba-11-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159386 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 54/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-54-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:07:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:07:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-54-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150991 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 SF 740/20 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-sf-740-20-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 13:00:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 12:00:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-sf-740-20-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150989 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 SF 737/20 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-sf-737-20-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 13:00:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 12:00:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-sf-737-20-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150987 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 KR 1479/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-kr-1479-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 13:00:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 12:00:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-kr-1479-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150985 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 155/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-155-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 13:00:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 12:00:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-155-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146578 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 KR 665/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-kr-665-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:15:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:15:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-kr-665-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146569 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 R 674/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-r-674-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:15:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:15:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-r-674-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144929 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 1 KR 1/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-1-kr-1-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:59:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:59:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-1-kr-1-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144776 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 KR 533/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-kr-533-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:57:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:57:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-kr-533-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143328 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 R 311/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-r-311-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:38:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:38:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-r-311-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143325 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 22 SF 436/20 AB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-22-sf-436-20-ab [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:38:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:38:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-22-sf-436-20-ab/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143321 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 15 KR 4484/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-15-kr-4484-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:38:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:38:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-15-kr-4484-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140267 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 P 206/20 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-p-206-20-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:17:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:17:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-p-206-20-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137590 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 7 SO 113/18 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-7-so-113-18-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:47:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:47:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-7-so-113-18-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136390 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 21 AS 700/20 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-21-as-700-20-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:38:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:38:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-21-as-700-20-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136385 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 19 AS 1233/10 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-19-as-1233-10 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:38:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:38:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-19-as-1233-10/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136381 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 SO 144/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-so-144-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:38:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:38:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-so-144-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136376 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 KR 621/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-kr-621-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:38:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:38:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-kr-621-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136372 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 KR 938/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-kr-938-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:38:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:38:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-kr-938-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134522 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 22 AL 207/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-22-al-207-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:22:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:22:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-22-al-207-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133767 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 39 R 792/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-39-r-792-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:17:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:17:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-39-r-792-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132772 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 15 KR 52/20 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-15-kr-52-20-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:09:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:09:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-15-kr-52-20-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131824 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 15 KR 67/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-15-kr-67-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:02:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:02:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-15-kr-67-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159394 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AL 2/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-al-2-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:07:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:07:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-al-2-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => a89d803a006ab15da52f9509caba9b6e [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:358e04c112559c180e3388c5f669436f:0.53019900 1750966575 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.