| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 21 KR 183/17 | 03.04.2019 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | 1. Februar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 8 BA 41/19 ER | 09.01.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 29. Januar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 12 SO 3577/18 | 12.01.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 SO 619/21 | 17.11.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | 29. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 4 BA 76/19 | 16.10.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Nürnberg | 29. Januar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 47 R 695/19 | 14.01.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 13 R 91/20 | 22.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 29. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 47 R 695/19 | 14.01.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 13 R 91/20 | 22.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 29. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 79 KA 378/13 | 22.06.2016 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 7 KA 45/16 | 22.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 29. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 87 KA 162/20 ER | 05.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 7 KA 38/20 B ER | 30.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 29. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 76 KR 173/16 | 14.02.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 93/17 | 13.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 39/20 B | 01.12.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 29. Januar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Bayreuth | S 17 AS 768/13 | 14.10.2015 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 11 AS 52/16 | 28.03.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 14 AS 34/19 R | 03.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 29. Januar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht für das Saarland | S 13 AL 357/16 | 19.02.2019 | Landessozialgericht für das Saarland | L 6 AL 5/19 | 11.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 2/20 R | 14.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 29. Januar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 27 KR 315/14 | 18.04.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 155/18 | 11.03.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 5/20 R | 29.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 29. Januar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 34 R 1834/13 | 17.06.2016 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 R 725/16 | 20.06.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 R 26/18 R | 08.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 29. Januar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 51 R 464/14 | 07.09.2018 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 3 R 80/19 | 29.10.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 21/19 R | 17.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 29. Januar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 198 KR 1982/16 | 29.05.2018 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KS 3/18 R | 07.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 29. Januar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 14 KA 266/17 | 27.06.2018 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 24/18 R | 13.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 29. Januar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mainz | S 3 KR 120/18 | 23.09.2020 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 5 KR 189/20 NZB | 07.01.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Mainz | 29. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 7 AS 1933/10 | 22.06.2010 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 4 AS 173/18 ZVW | 26.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 28. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 7 SF 305/18 E | 28.09.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 AS 508/20 B | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 28. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 8 AL 42/17 | 11.03.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 28. Januar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 14 KR 667/20 ER | 25.01.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 28. Januar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 14 KR 667/20 ER | 25.01.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 28. Januar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | S 12 KR 1696/04 | 12.08.2005 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 175/05 | 30.11.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 1/07 R | 15.11.2007 | Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | 28. Januar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 9 SB 261/13 | 15.06.2015 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 7 SB 83/15 | 18.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 SB 29/20 B | - | Sozialgericht Magdeburg | 28. Januar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 7 SF 306/18 E | 29.09.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 AS 507/20 B | 04.01.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 28. Januar 2021 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 308 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 308 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 308 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 7675, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131820 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 21 KR 183/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-21-kr-183-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:02:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:02:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-21-kr-183-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144927 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 BA 41/19 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-ba-41-19-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:59:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:59:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-ba-41-19-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140041 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 SO 3577/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-so-3577-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:14:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:14:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-so-3577-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134518 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 4 BA 76/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-4-ba-76-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:22:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:22:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-4-ba-76-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130394 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 R 91/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-r-91-20-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:01:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:01:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-r-91-20-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130393 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 R 91/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-r-91-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:01:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:01:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-r-91-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127148 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 KA 45/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ka-45-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:27:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:27:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ka-45-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127145 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 KA 38/20 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ka-38-20-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:27:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:27:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ka-38-20-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126522 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 93/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-93-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:21:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:21:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-93-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87550 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 14 AS 34/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-14-as-34-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:04:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:04:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-14-as-34-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87549 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 11 AL 2/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-11-al-2-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:04:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:04:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-11-al-2-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87548 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 KR 5/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-kr-5-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:03:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:03:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-kr-5-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87540 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 R 26/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-r-26-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:03:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:03:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-r-26-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87480 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 5 R 21/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-5-r-21-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:02:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:02:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-5-r-21-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87454 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 KS 3/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-ks-3-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:01:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:01:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-ks-3-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87444 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 24/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-24-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:01:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:01:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-24-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 71264 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 3 KR 120/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-3-kr-120-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 15:35:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 14:35:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-3-kr-120-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161602 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 173/18 ZVW [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-173-18-zvw [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:45:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:45:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-173-18-zvw/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136379 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 7 SF 305/18 E [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-7-sf-305-18-e [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:38:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:38:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-7-sf-305-18-e/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136368 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 AL 42/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-al-42-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:38:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:38:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-al-42-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136363 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 KR 667/20 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-kr-667-20-er-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:38:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:38:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-kr-667-20-er-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136362 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 KR 667/20 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-kr-667-20-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:38:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:38:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-kr-667-20-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134561 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 KR 1696/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-kr-1696-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:23:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:23:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-kr-1696-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133401 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 SB 261/13 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-sb-261-13 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:13:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:13:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-sb-261-13/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130218 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 507/20 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-507-20-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:59:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:59:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-507-20-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131820 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-02-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-02-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 21 KR 183/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-21-kr-183-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:02:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:02:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-21-kr-183-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 3f10feb610c5c350b42b9564625b67f2 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:4402b4e0a336226a230c79fcb023a350:0.69442500 1750965738 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.