| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 20 KR 483/18 | 14.01.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Neuruppin | 25. Januar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 26 AS 2111/15 | 16.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Neuruppin | 25. Januar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 26 AS 975/16 | 17.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Neuruppin | 25. Januar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 26 AS 2303/16 | 19.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Neuruppin | 25. Januar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 26 AS 933/19 | 08.12.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Neuruppin | 25. Januar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 26 AS 976/19 | 08.01.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Neuruppin | 25. Januar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 26 AS 240/18 | 11.01.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Neuruppin | 25. Januar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 26 AS 2293/15 | 12.01.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Neuruppin | 25. Januar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 26 AS 630/18 | 19.01.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Neuruppin | 25. Januar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 26 AS 1917/18 | 21.01.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Neuruppin | 25. Januar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 26 AS 77/20 | 21.01.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Neuruppin | 25. Januar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 15 AS 1684/12 | 05.12.2014 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 5 AS 20/15 | 23.06.2016 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Magdeburg | 25. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 15 KR 7/17 | 25.09.2020 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | 25. Januar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 14 KR 249/13 | 15.03.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 BA 4/20 | 27.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 25. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 14 AS 913/14 | 08.08.2018 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 4 AS 695/18 | 22.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 22. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 39 KR 348/16 | 03.11.2016 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht München | 22. Januar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 38 KA 435/19 | 12.01.2021 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht München | 22. Januar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 28 KA 169/18 | 23.11.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht München | 22. Januar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Regensburg | S 15 RF 2/19 | 20.02.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 12 SF 113/19 | 11.01.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 22. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Würzburg | S 6 KR 191/17 | 05.12.2017 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 20 KR 55/18 | 22.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 22. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 6 AS 5616/16 | 08.03.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 14 AS 563/18 | 17.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 22. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 43 BA 22/20 ER | 15.10.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 28 BA 68/20 B ER | 15.01.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 22. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 93 AS 8292/20 ER | 11.12.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 14 AS 1694/20 B ER | 12.01.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 22. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 42 KR 158/17 | 02.05.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 204/19 | 05.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 22. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 12 U 9/17 | 28.09.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 U 194/18 | 10.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 1/21 R | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 22. Januar 2021 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 311 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 311 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 311 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 7750, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133680 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 KR 483/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-kr-483-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:15:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:15:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-kr-483-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133675 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 26 AS 2111/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-26-as-2111-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:15:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:15:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-26-as-2111-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133672 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 26 AS 975/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-26-as-975-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:15:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:15:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-26-as-975-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133669 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 26 AS 2303/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-26-as-2303-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:15:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:15:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-26-as-2303-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133666 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 26 AS 933/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-26-as-933-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:15:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:15:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-26-as-933-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133663 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 26 AS 976/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-26-as-976-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:15:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:15:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-26-as-976-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133657 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 26 AS 240/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-26-as-240-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:15:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:15:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-26-as-240-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133655 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 26 AS 2293/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-26-as-2293-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:15:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:15:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-26-as-2293-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133652 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 26 AS 630/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-26-as-630-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:15:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:15:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-26-as-630-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133650 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 26 AS 1917/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-26-as-1917-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:15:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:15:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-26-as-1917-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133647 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 26 AS 77/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-26-as-77-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:15:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:15:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-26-as-77-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133374 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 15 AS 1684/12 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-15-as-1684-12 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:13:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:13:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-15-as-1684-12/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131828 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 15 KR 7/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-15-kr-7-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:02:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:02:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-15-kr-7-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130212 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 BA 4/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ba-4-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:59:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:59:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ba-4-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161600 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 695/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-695-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:45:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:45:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-695-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143311 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 39 KR 348/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-39-kr-348-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:38:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:38:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-39-kr-348-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143307 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 38 KA 435/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-38-ka-435-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:38:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:38:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-38-ka-435-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143303 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 28 KA 169/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-28-ka-169-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:38:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:38:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-28-ka-169-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130392 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 SF 113/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-sf-113-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:01:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:01:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-sf-113-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130389 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 20 KR 55/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-20-kr-55-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:01:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:01:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-20-kr-55-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127160 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 AS 563/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-as-563-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:27:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:27:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-as-563-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127157 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 28 BA 68/20 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-28-ba-68-20-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:27:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:27:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-28-ba-68-20-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127153 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 AS 1694/20 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-as-1694-20-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:27:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:27:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-as-1694-20-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127129 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 204/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-204-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:27:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:27:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-204-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127121 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 194/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-194-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:27:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:27:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-194-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133680 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 KR 483/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-kr-483-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:15:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:15:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-kr-483-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 1da93c5d9b2da593ef0a8ae8ec92ef48 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:8c13465cb56af44abd96e12966206492:0.81341800 1751015481 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.