| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Lübeck | S 19 KR 136/02 | 10.05.2004 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 87/04 | 31.03.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 15/05 R | 24.05.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | 8. August 2006 |
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 7 U 1412/02 | 27.01.2005 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 1 U 1813/05 | 06.02.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 86/06 B | 30.05.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | 8. August 2006 |
| Sozialgericht Mainz | S 6 KR 76/02 | 20.01.2004 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 1 KR 13/04 | 24.02.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 12/05 R | 04.04.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | 8. August 2006 |
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 1 U 103/04 | 28.09.2004 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 4 U 103/04 | 07.10.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 391/05 B | 29.05.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | 8. August 2006 |
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 5 KR 3875/04 | 12.09.2005 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 4373/05 | 14.02.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 7/06 B | 30.05.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | 8. August 2006 |
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 5 (16) KR 209/01 | 17.10.2003 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 227/03 | 20.01.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 5/05 R | 04.04.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | 8. August 2006 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 4 RA 1144/98 | 24.09.2003 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 17 RA 116/03 | 10.11.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 8/05 R | 14.03.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | 8. August 2006 |
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 9 U 04573/01 | 16.01.2003 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 1 U 1054/03 | 02.03.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 29/04 R | 13.12.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 8. August 2006 |
| Sozialgericht Aurich | S 6 RA 86/02 | 27.10.2004 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 59/04 R | 16.03.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | 8. August 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Oldenburg | S 5 RA 306/97 | 23.11.2000 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 1 RA 270/00 | 25.03.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 24/05 B | 16.03.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | 8. August 2006 |
| Sozialgericht Bremen | S 18 U 105/01 | 11.10.2001 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 16/12 U 7/02 | 12.08.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 25/04 R | 13.12.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 8. August 2006 |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 16 RJ 1168/01 | 14.04.2003 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 1 RJ 84/03 | 31.05.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 7. August 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 31 VS 4/03 | 29.03.2005 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 4 VS 1/05 | 20.06.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 7. August 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 16 RJ 206/01 | 13.01.2003 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 3 R 158/05 | 23.05.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 7. August 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 25 U 335/97 | 14.11.2002 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 3 U 13/03 | 14.03.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 7. August 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 25 U 255/01 | 09.02.2004 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 3 U 15/04 | 07.02.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 7. August 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 35 RA 452/99 | 29.04.2003 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 3 RA 31/03 | 23.05.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 7. August 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 31 SB 602/01 | 11.11.2003 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 4 SB 2/04 | 20.06.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 7. August 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | 24 U 273/97 | 07.07.1999 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 3 U 1/00 | 18.07.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 7. August 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 15 AS 284/06 ER | 23.02.2006 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 2 B 62/06 AS ER | 27.04.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 7. August 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 81 KR 4208/04 | 18.07.2006 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 7. August 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 81 KR 4207/04 | 18.07.2006 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 7. August 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 10 RJ 47/04 | 04.08.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 3 R 157/05 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 7. August 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 9 AS 7/05 ER | 24.02.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 12 B 7/05 AS ER | 09.06.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 7. August 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 14 KA 172/04 | 15.12.2004 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 7/05 R | 31.05.2006 | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 7. August 2006 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3111 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3111 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3111 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 77750, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83584 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-08-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-08-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 KR 15/05 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-kr-15-05-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:21:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:21:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-kr-15-05-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83551 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-08-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-08-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 86/06 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-86-06-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:20:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:20:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-86-06-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83549 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-08-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-08-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 12/05 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-12-05-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:20:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:20:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-12-05-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83544 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-08-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-08-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 391/05 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-391-05-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:20:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:20:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-391-05-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83538 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-08-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-08-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 KR 7/06 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-kr-7-06-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:19:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:19:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-kr-7-06-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83525 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-08-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-08-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 5/05 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-5-05-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:19:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:19:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-5-05-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83505 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-08-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-08-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 8/05 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-8-05-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:19:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:19:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-8-05-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83501 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-08-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-08-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 29/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-29-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:19:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:19:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-29-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83498 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-08-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-08-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 59/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-59-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:18:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:18:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-59-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83496 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-08-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-08-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 24/05 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-24-05-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:18:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:18:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-24-05-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83489 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-08-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-08-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 25/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-25-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:18:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:18:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-25-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 152510 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-08-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-08-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 RJ 84/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-rj-84-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:52:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:52:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-rj-84-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 152506 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-08-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-08-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 VS 1/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-vs-1-05-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:52:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:52:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-vs-1-05-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 152502 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-08-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-08-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 158/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-158-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:51:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:51:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-158-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 152498 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-08-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-08-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 13/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-13-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:51:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:51:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-13-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 152495 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-08-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-08-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 15/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-15-04-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:51:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:51:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-15-04-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 152491 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-08-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-08-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 RA 31/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-ra-31-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:51:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:51:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-ra-31-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 152487 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-08-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-08-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 SB 2/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-sb-2-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:51:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:51:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-sb-2-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 152483 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-08-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-08-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 1/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-1-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:51:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:51:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-1-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151186 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-08-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-08-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 B 62/06 AS ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-b-62-06-as-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:37:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:37:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-b-62-06-as-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145456 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-08-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-08-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 81 KR 4208/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-81-kr-4208-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:05:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:05:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-81-kr-4208-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145452 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-08-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-08-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 81 KR 4207/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-81-kr-4207-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:05:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:05:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-81-kr-4207-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141335 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-08-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-08-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 RJ 47/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-rj-47-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:26:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:26:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-rj-47-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140972 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-08-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-08-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 AS 7/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-as-7-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:23:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:23:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-as-7-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140804 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-08-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-08-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 KA 172/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-ka-172-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:22:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:22:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-ka-172-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83584 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-08-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-08-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 KR 15/05 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-kr-15-05-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:21:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:21:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-kr-15-05-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => f944284a215e70592b5f5c74f4ecf058 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:8f9eda253970a242a54391fea8f2563f:0.39756600 1757520188 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.