| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | 14 AR 868/94 | 12.03.1996 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 5 AL 8/02 | 02.03.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 3. August 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 9 RJ 941/04 | 11.08.2005 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 1 R 160/05 KN | 05.07.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 3. August 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 8 AL 942/98 | 21.12.2000 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 5 AL 52/01 | 23.02.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 3. August 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 43 SB 315/00 | 16.08.2005 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 4 SB 3/06 | 20.06.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 3. August 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 22 AS 511/05 ER | 04.10.2005 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 2 B 64/05 AS ER | 23.12.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 3. August 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 14 RJ 627/02 | 28.02.2005 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 3. August 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 10 RA 5/03 | 29.07.2004 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 3. August 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 10 RA 19/03 | 23.11.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 R 35/06 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 3. August 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 10 RA 19/03 | 23.11.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 R 35/06 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 3. August 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 55 AS 1404/05 ER | 24.01.2006 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 5 B 71/06 ER AS | 17.07.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Hamburg | 3. August 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 55 AS 4821/05 | 12.01.2006 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 B 167/06 AS PKH | 27.03.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 3. August 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 9 RJ 193/04 | 08.02.2006 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 4 R 635/06 | 13.07.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 3. August 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 13 AS 23/06 ER | 25.01.2006 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 B 226/06 AS ER | 29.03.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 3. August 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 8 AS 734/05 | 27.01.2006 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 B 241/06 AS PKH | 03.04.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 3. August 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 9 RA 2189/03 | 10.08.2004 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 4 RA 120/04 | 14.07.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 3. August 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 24 R 2137/05 | 23.12.2005 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 17 B 240/06 R PKH | 15.05.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 3. August 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 10 RA 6010/02 | 06.10.2003 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 4 RA 103/03 | 14.07.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 3. August 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 16 RA 2974/99 | 29.08.2003 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 17 RA 82/03 | 17.05.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 3. August 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 3 RA 7143/01 | 06.10.2003 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 4 RA 94/03 | 17.07.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 3. August 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 5 R 2513/05 | 07.11.2005 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 17 R 2024/05 | 17.05.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 3. August 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 1 KA 92/00 | 10.04.2002 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 7 KA 76/06 | 14.06.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 3. August 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 65 AS 10612/05 | 08.02.2006 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 B 237/06 AS PKH | 03.04.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 3. August 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 100 AS 1360/06 ER | 01.03.2006 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 B 257/06 AS ER | 10.04.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 3. August 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 94 AS 12048/05 ER | 24.02.2006 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 B 276/06 AS ER | 11.04.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 3. August 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 93 AS 925/06 ER | 03.03.2006 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 B 313/06 AS ER | 28.04.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 3. August 2006 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3115 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3115 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3115 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 77850, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 152475 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-08-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-08-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 AL 8/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-al-8-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:51:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:51:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-al-8-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 152471 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-08-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-08-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 R 160/05 KN [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-r-160-05-kn [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:51:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:51:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-r-160-05-kn/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 152467 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-08-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-08-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 AL 52/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-al-52-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:51:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:51:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-al-52-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 152463 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-08-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-08-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 SB 3/06 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-sb-3-06 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:51:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:51:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-sb-3-06/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151182 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-08-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-08-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 B 64/05 AS ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-b-64-05-as-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:37:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:37:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-b-64-05-as-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141037 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-08-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-08-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 RJ 627/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-rj-627-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:24:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:24:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-rj-627-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140835 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-08-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-08-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 RA 5/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-ra-5-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:23:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:23:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-ra-5-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140825 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-08-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-08-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 RA 19/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-ra-19-03-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:23:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:23:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-ra-19-03-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140824 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-08-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-08-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 RA 19/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-ra-19-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:23:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:23:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-ra-19-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135658 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-08-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-08-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 55 AS 1404/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-55-as-1404-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:34:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:34:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-55-as-1404-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100807 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-08-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-08-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 B 167/06 AS PKH [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-b-167-06-as-pkh [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:21:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:21:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-b-167-06-as-pkh/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100806 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-08-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-08-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 R 635/06 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-r-635-06-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:21:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:21:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-r-635-06-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100805 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-08-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-08-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 B 226/06 AS ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-b-226-06-as-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:21:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:21:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-b-226-06-as-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100804 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-08-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-08-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 B 241/06 AS PKH [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-b-241-06-as-pkh [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:21:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:21:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-b-241-06-as-pkh/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100803 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-08-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-08-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 RA 120/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ra-120-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:21:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:21:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ra-120-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100802 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-08-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-08-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 17 B 240/06 R PKH [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-17-b-240-06-r-pkh [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:21:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:21:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-17-b-240-06-r-pkh/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100801 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-08-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-08-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 RA 103/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ra-103-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:21:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:21:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ra-103-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100800 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-08-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-08-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 17 RA 82/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-17-ra-82-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:21:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:21:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-17-ra-82-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100799 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-08-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-08-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 RA 94/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ra-94-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:21:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:21:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ra-94-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100798 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-08-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-08-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 17 R 2024/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-17-r-2024-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:20:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:20:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-17-r-2024-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100797 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-08-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-08-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 KA 76/06 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ka-76-06 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:20:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:20:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ka-76-06/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100796 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-08-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-08-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 B 237/06 AS PKH [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-b-237-06-as-pkh [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:20:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:20:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-b-237-06-as-pkh/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100793 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-08-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-08-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 B 257/06 AS ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-b-257-06-as-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:20:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:20:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-b-257-06-as-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100791 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-08-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-08-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 B 276/06 AS ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-b-276-06-as-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:20:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:20:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-b-276-06-as-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100790 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-08-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-08-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 B 313/06 AS ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-b-313-06-as-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:20:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:20:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-b-313-06-as-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 152475 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-08-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-08-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 AL 8/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-al-8-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:51:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:51:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-al-8-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 8d04ac829e5a18e6982a14bce1e9c98f [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:f57fd934a7369dfaae159754585fb713:0.35278900 1757499749 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.